表致使義的“得”字句與相應的韓語使動句對比研究
A Comparative Study on Chinese "得" Causitive Constructions and Korean Causitive Constructions
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Chinese “de” sentence is a very complicated and diversified structure not only in form but also in its meaning. Among them, complement is a subject-predicate structure of the “de” sentence (“S+V+de+NP+AP/VP”) has some characteristics different from other “de” sentence, which is used to represent the causative events. For this reason, through the comparison of Chinese “S+V+de+NP+AP/VP” and Korean causative sentence (analytic causative construction), This research discusses their distinguishing features and its restricting factors in corresponding. For the same causative events, Chinese “S+V+de+NP+AP/VP” focuses on the consequences brought out by causee, i.e. the resultative causative, but Korean causative sentence focuses on the actions taken by causer, i.e. the directive causative with the meaning of purpose. It shows that these two causative sentences in Chinese and Korean are not exactly the same in the understanding of the causative. This difference is also reflected in the types of the subject. In the choice of subject, Chinese “S+V+de+NP+AP/VP” is unconfined, but Korean causative sentence is more restricted, tends to require that the subject is a high degree of animacy. It points out that “S+V+de+NP+AP/VP” corresponds to Korean causative sentence is mainly affected by the animacy hierarchy of the subject “S”.
Abstract
Chinese “de” sentence is a very complicated and diversified structure not only in form but also in its meaning. Among them, complement is a subject-predicate structure of the “de” sentence (“S+V+de+NP+AP/VP”) has some characteristics different from other “de” sentence, which is used to represent the causative events. For this reason, through the comparison of Chinese “S+V+de+NP+AP/VP” and Korean causative sentence (analytic causative construction), This research discusses their distinguishing features and its restricting factors in corresponding. For the same causative events, Chinese “S+V+de+NP+AP/VP” focuses on the consequences brought out by causee, i.e. the resultative causative, but Korean causative sentence focuses on the actions taken by causer, i.e. the directive causative with the meaning of purpose. It shows that these two causative sentences in Chinese and Korean are not exactly the same in the understanding of the causative. This difference is also reflected in the types of the subject. In the choice of subject, Chinese “S+V+de+NP+AP/VP” is unconfined, but Korean causative sentence is more restricted, tends to require that the subject is a high degree of animacy. It points out that “S+V+de+NP+AP/VP” corresponds to Korean causative sentence is mainly affected by the animacy hierarchy of the subject “S”.
참고문헌 (50)
- Croft，W., "語言類型學與語言共性" (2009), 複旦大學出版社
- Comrie，B., "語言共性和語言類型" (1989), 華夏出版社
- Fillmore，C. J., "“格”辨" (2002), 商務印書館
- Some Problems for Case Grammar, "Fillmore，C. J.", ~, pp.working papers of linguistics 10 (1971)
- Shibatani，M., "Syntax and Semantics 6" (1976), New York Academic Press
- Song J. J., "Causatives and Causation" (1996), Longman
- Song J. J., "Linguistic typology: morphology and syntax" (2008), 北京大學出版社
- Tomly，L., "Toward a Cognitive Semantic 1" (2000), The MIT Press
- 笵 曉, "語法研究和探索（10）" (2000), 商務印書館
- 顧陽, "生成語法理論與現代漢語語法研究" (2001), 黑龍江教育出版社
- 郭姝慧, "現代漢語致使句式研究", 博士, pp.2004
- 郭銳, "致使的類型學和漢語的致使表達", 第一屆肯特崗國際漢語語言學圓桌會議論文 (2001)
- 蔣 靜, "小句補語句概念整合研究", 博士, pp.2009
- 金海月, "朝漢致使笵疇對比研究", 博士, pp.2007
- 金海月, "從朝鮮語反觀漢語的“V得”致使結構", 漢語學習, (2) (2008)
- 金賢姬, "漢韓語言認知時點的對比研究-從主語級話題生命度的角度", 博士, pp.2015
- 李大忠, "“使”字兼语句偏误分析", 世界汉语教学, (1) (1996)
- 李雷實, "現代漢語可逆性致使句研究", 碩士, pp.2010
- 李臨定, "帶“得”字的補語句", 中國語文, (5) (1963)
- 李臨定, "動補格句式", 中國語文, (2) (1980)
- 李臨定, "現代漢語句型" (2011), 商務印書館
- 繆錦安, "漢語的語義結構和補語形式" (1990), 上海外國語出版社
- 牛順心, "漢語中致使笵疇的結構類型研究", 博士, pp.2004
- 朴恩石, "漢韓分析型致使結構比較研究", 博士, pp.2010
- 孙银新, "“得”字兼语句新论", 汉语学习, (1) (1998)
- 王力, "漢語史稿" (1985), 商務印書館
- 王力, "漢語語法史" (2000), 商務印書館
- 王力, "中國現代語法" (2011), 商務印書館
- 熊仲儒, "現代漢語中的致使句式" (2004), 安徽大學出版社
- 楊 平, "帶“得”的述補結構的產生和發展", 古漢語研究, (1) (1990)
- 楊子, "“我等得你心急”類“V得”句的識解", 漢語學習, (4) (2008)
- 嶽俊發, "“得”字句的產生與演變", 語言研究, (2) (1984)
- 張 璐, "現代漢語“得”字補語句研究", 博士, pp.2003
- 張伯江, "從施受關係到句式語義" (2009), 商務印書館
- 張豫峰, "現代漢語句子研究" (2006), 學林出版社
- 朱其智, "“VA得OC”結構中“得”具有致使義", 漢語學習, (3) (2009)
- 趙長才, "結構助詞“得”的來源與“V得C”述補結構的形成", 中國語文, (2) (2002)
- 김석득, "자리만듦성과 시킴월 되기 제약", 외국어로서의 한국어교육, 5 (1980)
- 김성주, "국어 사동문 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1997
- 김윤정, "한국어와 중국어의 사건 해석 패턴 대조 분석 - 중국어 사동구문의 한국어 번역 양상에 보이는 태의 불일치 현상을 중심으로 -", 언어와언어학, (55), pp.67~104 (2012), 언어연구소[DOI]
- 김은일, "유생성의 문법", 현대문법연구, 20 (2000)
- 김은일, "유생성 부호화의 유형론 -한국어일어영어를 중심으로-", 동북아 문화연구, 1(1), pp.37~57 (2001), 동북아시아문화학회
- 남기심, "표준국어문법론" (1985), 탑출판사
- 서정수, "연결어미‘-고’와‘-어(서)’", 언어와 언어학, (8) (1982)
- 양인석, "한국어의 접속화", 어학연구, 8(2) (1972)
- 윤평현, "‘-도록’의 의미(意味)와 문법(文法)", 한국언어문학, 20 (1981)
- 윤평현, "‘-게，-도록’의 의미에 대하여", 국어국문학제, 100 (1988)
- 이익섭, "국어문법론강의" (1999), 학연사
- 최규발, "코퍼스에 기반한 현대중국어 ‘氣得’구문의 사역성과 비사역성 試探", 중국어문학논집, 66(66), pp.49~69 (2011), 중국어문학연구회
- 최재희, "한국어문법론" (2004), 태학사