본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

正祖 즉위 초기 對淸 외교 정책과 조정의 對淸 인식

King Chŏngjo’s Diplomatic Policy toward the Qing during the Early Years of His Reign and the Court Officials’ View of the Qing

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

This article examines Chosŏn court’s diplomatic policy toward the Qing during the first few years of King Chŏngjo's reign up until Qianlong Emperor’s seventieth birthday in 1780. Existing studies have stressed the significance of this imperial birthday as a pivotal moment in the relationship between Chosŏn and the Qing. Seldom, however, did they venture to explore the role and importance of Chŏngjo’s early policy toward the Qing prior to 1780. This article argues that, during these early years of his reign, Chŏngjo actively pushed forward various measures to show the sincerity of the Chosŏn in “serving the great.” The king sent a special diplomatic mission to the Qing to apologize for inappropriate words in a previous memorial. The king also dispatched envoys to Shengjing in Manchuria to greet Qianlong despite the emperor’s prior order to exempt Chosŏn from this obligation. These were all received very favorably by Qianlong. Furthermore, Chŏngjo even insisted the court send a special envoy to celebrate the imperial visit to Shengjing, even if his suggestion did not materialize mainly due to the absence of a proper precedent. All of these active royal efforts aimed at exemplifying to the Qing the “sincerity” of Chosŏn and at bolstering amicable relations between the two states. The court’s decision to celebrate in advance the seventieth birthday of the emperor should be understood in this context. It did not mark the beginning of Chŏngjo’s active policy toward the Qing but was a continuation of a series of such efforts taken earlier in his reign. Chosŏn, however, had no precedent that could justify sending a mission to celebrate the seventieth birthday of a Qing emperor. Shortly before the demise of Kangxi Emperor in 1722, the Qing court delivered an order to Chosŏn that an envoy should be sent carrying a special memorial congratulating the seventieth imperial birthday that would fall in the third month of 1723. The memorial, however, was never submitted because of the emperor’s death. While assigning to the regular mission arriving in Beijing at the end of 1779 the task of carrying a memorial celebrating Qianlong’s seventieth birthday, Chief State Councilor Kim Sangch’ŏl surprisingly claimed that Chosŏn had sent an envoy to celebrate Kangxi’s seventieth birthday, fabricating a precedent by distorting diplomatic documents exchanged earlier. Kim’s fabrication of a precedent undoubtedly grew out of his concern to justify the king’s unprecedented action to send such a mission. Kim soon fabricated another precedent regarding the timing of Chosŏn's celebration of Kangxi's birthdays, this time to support his suggestion that the court sends another mission in 1780 to celebrate the imperial seventieth birthday on the birthday itself. Why was Kim’s fabrication necessary? This article argues that solid Sino-barbarian dichotomy pervasive among envoys and other court officials at that time lay behind Kim's fabrication. With the flourishing of the Qing and the stabilization of Chosŏn-Qing relations during the eighteenth century, there were officials in Chosŏn who acknowledged the prosperity of the Qing. The view that the Qing was treating Chosŏn very favorably was also widely shared among the monarchs and court officials. However, underneath this level of perception toward the Qing lay a firmly-rooted view that considered the Manchus as barbarians. Celebrating the seventieth birthday of a Qing emperor was, in fact, unprecedented, and the Qianlong’s court, at least officially, had never mandated Chosŏn to dispatch a mission for that purpose. The dispatch was primarily a voluntary move by Chŏngjo. In light of the still-solid Sino-barbarian dichotomy, the lack of a precedent, and the absence of a Qing order to mandate the dispatch of a mission, it was difficult for Chŏngjo to put his scheme into action. Kim Sangch’ŏl, therefore, found a way to relieve the burden for the king by fabricating precedents justifying Chŏngjo’s actions.

Abstract

This article examines Chosŏn court’s diplomatic policy toward the Qing during the first few years of King Chŏngjo's reign up until Qianlong Emperor’s seventieth birthday in 1780. Existing studies have stressed the significance of this imperial birthday as a pivotal moment in the relationship between Chosŏn and the Qing. Seldom, however, did they venture to explore the role and importance of Chŏngjo’s early policy toward the Qing prior to 1780. This article argues that, during these early years of his reign, Chŏngjo actively pushed forward various measures to show the sincerity of the Chosŏn in “serving the great.” The king sent a special diplomatic mission to the Qing to apologize for inappropriate words in a previous memorial. The king also dispatched envoys to Shengjing in Manchuria to greet Qianlong despite the emperor’s prior order to exempt Chosŏn from this obligation. These were all received very favorably by Qianlong. Furthermore, Chŏngjo even insisted the court send a special envoy to celebrate the imperial visit to Shengjing, even if his suggestion did not materialize mainly due to the absence of a proper precedent. All of these active royal efforts aimed at exemplifying to the Qing the “sincerity” of Chosŏn and at bolstering amicable relations between the two states. The court’s decision to celebrate in advance the seventieth birthday of the emperor should be understood in this context. It did not mark the beginning of Chŏngjo’s active policy toward the Qing but was a continuation of a series of such efforts taken earlier in his reign. Chosŏn, however, had no precedent that could justify sending a mission to celebrate the seventieth birthday of a Qing emperor. Shortly before the demise of Kangxi Emperor in 1722, the Qing court delivered an order to Chosŏn that an envoy should be sent carrying a special memorial congratulating the seventieth imperial birthday that would fall in the third month of 1723. The memorial, however, was never submitted because of the emperor’s death. While assigning to the regular mission arriving in Beijing at the end of 1779 the task of carrying a memorial celebrating Qianlong’s seventieth birthday, Chief State Councilor Kim Sangch’ŏl surprisingly claimed that Chosŏn had sent an envoy to celebrate Kangxi’s seventieth birthday, fabricating a precedent by distorting diplomatic documents exchanged earlier. Kim’s fabrication of a precedent undoubtedly grew out of his concern to justify the king’s unprecedented action to send such a mission. Kim soon fabricated another precedent regarding the timing of Chosŏn's celebration of Kangxi's birthdays, this time to support his suggestion that the court sends another mission in 1780 to celebrate the imperial seventieth birthday on the birthday itself. Why was Kim’s fabrication necessary? This article argues that solid Sino-barbarian dichotomy pervasive among envoys and other court officials at that time lay behind Kim's fabrication. With the flourishing of the Qing and the stabilization of Chosŏn-Qing relations during the eighteenth century, there were officials in Chosŏn who acknowledged the prosperity of the Qing. The view that the Qing was treating Chosŏn very favorably was also widely shared among the monarchs and court officials. However, underneath this level of perception toward the Qing lay a firmly-rooted view that considered the Manchus as barbarians. Celebrating the seventieth birthday of a Qing emperor was, in fact, unprecedented, and the Qianlong’s court, at least officially, had never mandated Chosŏn to dispatch a mission for that purpose. The dispatch was primarily a voluntary move by Chŏngjo. In light of the still-solid Sino-barbarian dichotomy, the lack of a precedent, and the absence of a Qing order to mandate the dispatch of a mission, it was difficult for Chŏngjo to put his scheme into action. Kim Sangch’ŏl, therefore, found a way to relieve the burden for the king by fabricating precedents justifying Chŏngjo’s actions.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. 구범진, "1780년 열하의 칠순 만수절과 건륭의 ‘제국’", 명청사연구, (40), pp.177~217 (2013), 명청사학회[DOI]
  2. 구범진, "조선의 청 황제 성절 축하와 건륭 칠순 ‘진하 외교’", 한국문화, (68), pp.215~248 (2014), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
  3. 구범진, "1780년대 淸朝의 朝鮮 使臣에 대한 接待의 變化", 명청사연구, (48), pp.535~564 (2017), 명청사학회[DOI]
  4. 구범진, "淸 乾隆 연간 外藩 宴禮의 변화와 乾隆의‘盛世’", 역사문화연구, (68), pp.147~196 (2018), 역사문화연구소[DOI]
  5. 김창수, "19세기 朝鮮·淸 관계와 使臣外交", 박사, 국사학과, pp.2016
  6. 김창수, "건륭연간 외교 공간의 확장과 조선 사신의 교류 -조선·청 지식 교류의 기반에 관하여-", 한국학논총, 51, pp.219~252 (2019), 한국학연구소[DOI]
  7. 손성욱, "淸 朝貢國 使臣 儀禮의 形成과 變化", 동양사학연구, (143), pp.273~315 (2018), 동양사학회[DOI]
  8. 허태구, "정조대 대청 외교와 대명의리의 공존,그 맥락과 의미", 지역과 역사, (47), pp.141~178 (2020), 부경역사연구소[DOI]
  9. 연갑수, "영조대 對淸使行의 운영과 對淸關係에 대한 인식", 한국문화, (51), pp.29~63 (2010), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
  10. "日省錄"[URL]
  11. "『淸實錄』 高宗實錄 권1065", pp.244~ (1986), 中華書局
  12. "光緖 『淸會典事例』 권507" (1991), 中華書局
  13. 김우진, "1703년 康熙帝의 御筆을 둘러싼 조선의 정치적 파장과 숙종의 대응", 한국실학연구, (40), pp.513~542 (2020), 한국실학학회
  14. 孫衛國, "從「尊明」到「奉淸」: 朝鮮王朝對淸意識的嬗變(1627-1910)", pp.193~ (2018), 國立臺灣大學出版中心
  15. "光緖 『淸會典事例』 권506, 禮部 217 朝貢", 859~863
  16. 趙顯命, "燕行錄全集 日本所藏編 1", pp.175~ (2001), 동국대 한국문학연구소
  17. 俞拓基, "燕行錄全集 38", pp.147~148 (2001), 동국대학교출판부
  18. 김일환, "심양문안사 조현명(趙顯命)의 사행 일기 연구", 동악어문학, (79), pp.205~236 (2019), 동악어문학회
  19. Wang Yuanchong, "Remaking the Chinese Empire: Manchu-Korean Relations, 1616-1911", pp.75~85 (2018), Cornell University Press
  20. 國史編纂委員會, "同文彙考", 한진인쇄공사
  21. "同文彙考 原編", ~
  22. "通文館志 卷10, 紀年續編", ~
  23. "『淸實錄』 世宗實錄 卷6", pp.136~ (1986), 中華書局
  24. "孝宗實錄 권9", ~
  25. "顯宗改修實錄 권2", ~
  26. 구범진, "1780년, 열하로 간 정조의 사신들: 대청 외교와 ‘열하일기’에 얽힌 숨겨진 이야기", pp.45~60 (2021), 21세기북스
  27. 우경섭, "조선중화주의의 성립과 동아시아", pp.156~186 (2013), 유니스토리
  28. 김대중, "洪羲俊의 對淸認識", 고전문학연구, (47), pp.65~102 (2015), 한국고전문학회[DOI]
  29. 김창수, "耳溪 洪良浩의 華夷觀과 청 인식의 두 층위", 사림, (69), pp.131~157 (2019), 수선사학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)