본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

“두시언해” 초간본과 중간본의 비교 -표기 변화를 중심으로-

Notational system comparison between the first-edition and the revised-edition of Dusi-Eonhae

1

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper is designed to examine significant differences between the first-edition and the revised-edition of Dusi-Eonhae. Dusi-Eonhae that were printed in 1481 for the first time is one of the important references in the Middle Korean. Meanwhile, Dusi-Eonhae that were revised partially in 1632 is one of the important references in the Modern Korean. It has been considered so far that the linguistic differences between the first-edition and the revised-edition of Dusi-Eonhae were highly significant between the middle ages and modern ages in Korean. Therefore, this paper focused on changes of notational system among significant linguistic differences that were showed in the first-edition and the revised-edition of Dusi-Eonhae. As a result, some facts that were revealed in the revised-edition of Dusi-Eonhae is as in the following. Firstly, Side dot, with which mark syllable intonation, ‘ㅿ’ and ‘ㆁ’ were disappeared completely. Secondly, consonant ‘ㅅ’ and ‘ㄷ’ placed under a vowel in syllable were used with disorder. Thirdly, syllabication that divide noun from postpositional particle and verb from inflectional ending appeared. Beside those, Case postpositional particles and fortis notation system, etc. were used with disorder.

Abstract

This paper is designed to examine significant differences between the first-edition and the revised-edition of Dusi-Eonhae. Dusi-Eonhae that were printed in 1481 for the first time is one of the important references in the Middle Korean. Meanwhile, Dusi-Eonhae that were revised partially in 1632 is one of the important references in the Modern Korean. It has been considered so far that the linguistic differences between the first-edition and the revised-edition of Dusi-Eonhae were highly significant between the middle ages and modern ages in Korean. Therefore, this paper focused on changes of notational system among significant linguistic differences that were showed in the first-edition and the revised-edition of Dusi-Eonhae. As a result, some facts that were revealed in the revised-edition of Dusi-Eonhae is as in the following. Firstly, Side dot, with which mark syllable intonation, ‘ㅿ’ and ‘ㆁ’ were disappeared completely. Secondly, consonant ‘ㅅ’ and ‘ㄷ’ placed under a vowel in syllable were used with disorder. Thirdly, syllabication that divide noun from postpositional particle and verb from inflectional ending appeared. Beside those, Case postpositional particles and fortis notation system, etc. were used with disorder.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. 김성규, "표기자의 의도를 통해서 본 중간본 두시언해의 음운론적 특징 in: 두시와 두시언해 연구", pp.267~290 (1998), 태학사
  2. 백두현, "두시언해 초간본과 중간본의 통시음운론적 비교", 어문학, 50, pp.49~67 (1989), 한국어문학회
  3. 안병희, "중세국어의 한글 자료에 대한 종합적인 고찰", 규장각, (3), pp.109~147 (1977)
  4. 윤석민, "쉽게 읽는 중각 두시언해" (2006), 박이정
  5. 윤용선, "두시언해 in 국어사 자료와 국어학의 연구", pp.173~186 (1993), 문화과 지성사
  6. 이현희, "두시와 두시언해 권 6" (1997), 신구문화사
  7. 이현희, "두시와 두시언해 권 7" (1997), 신구문화사
  8. 조남호, "중간두시언해에서의 ㆁ, ㅿ 표기의 변화 양상 in: 국어사와 차자 표기", pp.751~763 (1995), 태학사
  9. 조남호, "두시언해 한자어 연구" (2001), 태학사
  10. 한국정신문화연구원 인문연구실, "두시와 두시언해 연구" (1998), 태학사
  11. 홍윤표, "근대국어 연구(1)" (1994), 태학사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)