“두시언해” 초간본과 중간본의 문법적 특징 비교
A Comparison of Grammatical Differeces between the First-edition and the Revised-edition of Dusi-Eonhae
4
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is designed to examine grammatical differences between the first-edition and the revised-edition of Dusi-Eonhae. Dusi-Eonhae that were printed in 1481 for the first time is one of the important references in the Middle Korean. Meanwhile, Dusi-Eonhae that were revised partially in 1632 is one of the important references in the Modern Korean. It has been considered so far that the linguistic differences between the first-edition and the revised-edition of Dusi-Eonhae were highly significant between the middle ages and modern ages in Korean. Therefore, this paper focused on changes of grammatical characteristics among significant linguistic differences that were showed in the first-edition and the revised-edition of Dusi-Eonhae. As a result, some of facts that were revealed in the revised-edition of Dusi-Eonhae is as in the following. Firstly, forms that several of postpositional particles had taken changed. Plus functions that several of postpositional particles had performed disappeared. Secondly, some of types of which verb had inflected were changed. Plus forms that several of inflectional pre-endings and connective endings had taken were changed or replaced with another forms. Thirdly, some of derivational suffixes and expressions integrated grammatically made change in form.
Abstract
This paper is designed to examine grammatical differences between the first-edition and the revised-edition of Dusi-Eonhae. Dusi-Eonhae that were printed in 1481 for the first time is one of the important references in the Middle Korean. Meanwhile, Dusi-Eonhae that were revised partially in 1632 is one of the important references in the Modern Korean. It has been considered so far that the linguistic differences between the first-edition and the revised-edition of Dusi-Eonhae were highly significant between the middle ages and modern ages in Korean. Therefore, this paper focused on changes of grammatical characteristics among significant linguistic differences that were showed in the first-edition and the revised-edition of Dusi-Eonhae. As a result, some of facts that were revealed in the revised-edition of Dusi-Eonhae is as in the following. Firstly, forms that several of postpositional particles had taken changed. Plus functions that several of postpositional particles had performed disappeared. Secondly, some of types of which verb had inflected were changed. Plus forms that several of inflectional pre-endings and connective endings had taken were changed or replaced with another forms. Thirdly, some of derivational suffixes and expressions integrated grammatically made change in form.
참고문헌 (17)
- 고영근, "표준 중세국어문법론(제3판)" (2010), 집문당
- 노걸대의 언해에 대한 비교 연구, "김완진", 한국연구원, ~ (1976)
- 박용찬, "“두시언해” 초간본과 중간본의 비교 -표기 변화를 중심으로-", 한말연구, (27), pp.93~126 (2010), 한말연구학회
- 백두현, "두시언해 초간본과 중간본의 통시음운론적 비교", 어문학, 50, pp.49~67 (1989), 한국어문학회
- 안병희, "중간 두시언해에 나타난 t구개음화에 대하여, In 일석 이희승 선생 송수기념논총" (1957), 일조각
- 안병희, "중세국어의 한글 자료에 대한 종합적인 고찰", 규장각, (3), pp.109~147 (1977)
- 안병희, "중세국어문법론" (1990), 학연사
- 윤석민, "쉽게 읽는 중각 두시언해" (2006), 박이정
- 윤용선, "두시언해, 국어사 자료와 국어학의 연구" (1993), 문화과 지성사
- 이기문, "신정판 국어사 개설" (1972), 태학사
- 이승희, "중세국어 감동법 연구", 석사, pp.1996
- 이현희, "두시와 두시언해 권 6" (1997), 신구문화사
- 이현희, "두시와 두시언해 권 7" (1997), 신구문화사
- 조남호, "중간두시언해에서의 ㆁ, ㅿ 표기의 변화 양상, 국어사와 차자 표기" (1995), 태학사
- 조남호, "두시언해 한자어 연구", pp.751~763 (2001), 태학사
- 한국정신문화연구원 인문연구실, "두시와 두시언해 연구" (1998), 태학사
- 홍윤표, "근대국어 연구(1)" (1994), 태학사
