본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『사서언해』, 『사서율곡언해』 비교 연구

A comparative study between Saseo-eonhae and Saseoyulgok-eonhae

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This research aimed at describing the characteristic difference by comparing Saseo-eonhae, published in the 16th century and Saseoyulgok-eonhae, published in the 18th century. This research grasped the regular pattern of conflicting aspect between the above two documents. This research investigated and described the characteristic trends between such expressions by comparing them with each other. The aspects can be classified as follows. Phrases involved with ‘di’, phrases involved with ‘-O-’, phrases realized with ‘-gi’, phrases involved with ‘ᄒᆞ다’, characteristic in the adnominal composition, replacement of ending. Among them, ‘di’ phrases, ‘-O-’ phrases can be said to be most characteristic. In 『Saseo-eonhae』, phrases realized with end ending and coupling ending appeared, while in Saseoyulgok-eonhae, phrases involved with ‘di’ appeared. That’s similar to ‘-ㄹ+디+-니라’, which can be determined with a structure of one meaning according to the opinion, or can be diachronically analyzed that bound noun ‘di’ was used along with the adnominal ending. In modern Korean language, also, ‘-ㄴ 것’, ‘-ㄹ 것’ structures display the aspects of manner, since the medium words are considered as the same context with the structural cognition of syntax. On the other hand, a difference in the interposition of ‘-O-’ was confirmed. In Saseoyulgok-eonhae, more ‘-O-’ appeared. However, ‘-O-’ was less used in the adnominal composition. On the contrary, there were phrases were only ‘-O-’ disappeared, while others were substituted with other composition as ‘-O-’ disappeared.

Abstract

This research aimed at describing the characteristic difference by comparing Saseo-eonhae, published in the 16th century and Saseoyulgok-eonhae, published in the 18th century. This research grasped the regular pattern of conflicting aspect between the above two documents. This research investigated and described the characteristic trends between such expressions by comparing them with each other. The aspects can be classified as follows. Phrases involved with ‘di’, phrases involved with ‘-O-’, phrases realized with ‘-gi’, phrases involved with ‘ᄒᆞ다’, characteristic in the adnominal composition, replacement of ending. Among them, ‘di’ phrases, ‘-O-’ phrases can be said to be most characteristic. In 『Saseo-eonhae』, phrases realized with end ending and coupling ending appeared, while in Saseoyulgok-eonhae, phrases involved with ‘di’ appeared. That’s similar to ‘-ㄹ+디+-니라’, which can be determined with a structure of one meaning according to the opinion, or can be diachronically analyzed that bound noun ‘di’ was used along with the adnominal ending. In modern Korean language, also, ‘-ㄴ 것’, ‘-ㄹ 것’ structures display the aspects of manner, since the medium words are considered as the same context with the structural cognition of syntax. On the other hand, a difference in the interposition of ‘-O-’ was confirmed. In Saseoyulgok-eonhae, more ‘-O-’ appeared. However, ‘-O-’ was less used in the adnominal composition. On the contrary, there were phrases were only ‘-O-’ disappeared, while others were substituted with other composition as ‘-O-’ disappeared.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. 고영근, "표준 중세국어문법론" (1987), 탑출판사
  2. 남경란, "사서언해의 국어학적 고찰―논어언해의 어휘를 중심으로―", 민족문화논총, (34), pp.159~193 (2006), 민족문화연구소
  3. 안병희, "중세국어문법론" (1990), 학연사
  4. 이광정, "한문언해문장의 문체적 특성 : 사서언해 등의 서술어 및 활용어미의분포적 특성 등을 중심으로", 한국어학, 2, pp.317~346 (1995)
  5. 여찬영, "「中庸諺解」의 번역언어학적 분석", 언어과학연구, (38), pp.1~22 (2006), 언어과학회
  6. 여찬영, "사서율곡선생언해의 번역학적 연구", 인문과학연구, (20), pp.223~244 (2013), 인문과학연구소
  7. 이종철, "교정청본 소학언해와 사서언해의 표기에 대하여", 국어교육, 33, pp.63~76 (1978), 한국어교육학회
  8. 정수현, "선어말어미 '-오-'의 기능과 변천 : 명사성의 약화와 그 기능 변화를 중심으로", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2011
  9. 정수현, "15세기 관형화 구성에 나타난 선어말어미 ‘-오-’ 연구", 겨레어문학, (48), pp.351~370 (2012), 겨레어문학회[DOI]
  10. 최대희, "국어 매인이름씨 ‘줄, 바’의 변천 연구", 한말연구, (36), pp.221~248 (2015), 한말연구학회[DOI]
  11. 허웅, "우리 옛말본" (1975), 샘문화사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)