1920년대 초 사회주의사상의 수용과 『新生活』
The Introduction of Socialism in the Early 1920s and New Life
2
조회
0
다운로드
23
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
‘New Life Group’(NLG, hereafter) argued that there needed to be ‘new movement’ of ‘new life’ for a reorganization of life in order to reconstruct Korea under Japanese rule. The slogans for the ‘new movement’ were the ‘establishment of the culture of the common people’ and the ‘inspiration of liberal ideas’. ‘The culture of the common people’ refers to ‘the culture of labor’, which is grounded in anti-capitalism. Another movement in Japan-occupied Korea was the ‘inspiration of liberal ideas’ by introduction of new ideas. Especially, Marxism was emphasized. Among the thinkers of the ‘new ideas’ introduced were Kropotkin, Max Stirner, Paul Lafargue, and William Morris as well as Marx. They were regarded as the thinkers that criticized existing capitalism. NLG focused on the introduction of Marxism, and proclaimed in the journal, New Life, that Marxism was an orthodox perspective. This implied that various socialist ideas in the colonial Korea concentrated on Marxism. Among the subjects of Marxism introduced by NLG, ‘class struggle’ was the most emphasized one. It was stressed by NLG that labor fighting against capitalism and for socialism could play an important role in class struggle. That is, it was argued that, given an inevitable social evolution, the revolutionary working class could provide the power for social evolution, and historical development could take place through class struggle based on the activeness of working class. It is noteworthy that NLG emphasized the concept of the ‘historical development through class struggle’ as well as the ‘power’ of the transition in addition to the ‘inevitable socialism.’ This view provided the foundation for the topic of how the ‘power’ is organized. NLG described itself as a Marxist group. This indicates the Marxism not as embodied in the group but as the orthodox tendency, which is a characteristic of Marxism and Marxists in Japan-occupied Korea. The Marxism as the ‘orthodox tendency’ became embodied in the group as the socialist movement developed.
Abstract
‘New Life Group’(NLG, hereafter) argued that there needed to be ‘new movement’ of ‘new life’ for a reorganization of life in order to reconstruct Korea under Japanese rule. The slogans for the ‘new movement’ were the ‘establishment of the culture of the common people’ and the ‘inspiration of liberal ideas’. ‘The culture of the common people’ refers to ‘the culture of labor’, which is grounded in anti-capitalism. Another movement in Japan-occupied Korea was the ‘inspiration of liberal ideas’ by introduction of new ideas. Especially, Marxism was emphasized. Among the thinkers of the ‘new ideas’ introduced were Kropotkin, Max Stirner, Paul Lafargue, and William Morris as well as Marx. They were regarded as the thinkers that criticized existing capitalism. NLG focused on the introduction of Marxism, and proclaimed in the journal, New Life, that Marxism was an orthodox perspective. This implied that various socialist ideas in the colonial Korea concentrated on Marxism. Among the subjects of Marxism introduced by NLG, ‘class struggle’ was the most emphasized one. It was stressed by NLG that labor fighting against capitalism and for socialism could play an important role in class struggle. That is, it was argued that, given an inevitable social evolution, the revolutionary working class could provide the power for social evolution, and historical development could take place through class struggle based on the activeness of working class. It is noteworthy that NLG emphasized the concept of the ‘historical development through class struggle’ as well as the ‘power’ of the transition in addition to the ‘inevitable socialism.’ This view provided the foundation for the topic of how the ‘power’ is organized. NLG described itself as a Marxist group. This indicates the Marxism not as embodied in the group but as the orthodox tendency, which is a characteristic of Marxism and Marxists in Japan-occupied Korea. The Marxism as the ‘orthodox tendency’ became embodied in the group as the socialist movement developed.
참고문헌 (42)
- "新生活", ~
- "共濟", ~
- "我聲", ~
- "開闢", ~
- "三千里", ~
- "新小說", ~
- "東亞日報", ~
- "朝鮮日報", ~
- "每日申報", ~
- 三千里社, "朝鮮思想家總攬" (1933), 三千里社
- 李光洙, "李光洙全集 9" (1971), 三中堂
- 윌리엄 모리스, "에코토피아뉴스" (2004), 필맥
- 山川均 述, "動物界の道徳" (1908), 有樂社
- ピイタア クロポトキン, "相互扶助論: 進化の一要素" (1917), 春陽堂
- 大杉栄, "クロポトキン研究" (1920), アルス
- シドニー, "労働組合運動史" (1920), 叢文閣
- 生田弘治, "社会改造の八大思想家" (1920), 東京堂書店
- クロポトキン, "動物界の道徳" (1921), 三德社
- 小泉信三, "社会組織の経済理論的批評" (1921), 下出書店
- 山川均, "歷史を創造する力" (1922), 三德社
- 林癸未夫, "国際労働運動史" (1923), 早稲田大学出版部
- William Morris, "News from Nowhere or An Epoch of Rest, Being Some Chapters from a Utopian Romance" (1891), Reeves & Turner
- Sidney Webb, "The history of Trade Unionism" (1894), Longmans, Green and Co.
- Pyotr Alexeyevich Kropotkin, "Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution" (1902), William Heinemann
- 김윤식, "개정ㆍ증보 이광수와 그의 시대 2" (1999), 솔출판사
- 박홍규, "윌리엄 모리스 평전" (2007), 개마고원
- 에드워드 파머 톰슨, "윌리엄 모리스: 낭만주의자에서 혁명가로 1ㆍ2" (2012), 한길사
- 유재천, "한국 언론과 이데올로기" (1990), 文學과 知性社
- 鄭文吉, "마르크스의 사상 형성과 초기 저작: 독일이데올로기와 마르크스ㆍ엥겔스 전집 연구" (1984), 문학과지성사
- 鄭文吉, "에피고넨의 시대: 靑年헤겔派와 칼 마르크스" (1987), 文學과知性社
- 정문길, "독일 이데올로기의 문헌학적 연구 - 초고의 해석과 편찬" (2011), 문학과지성사
- 박종린, "꺼지지 않은 불꽃, 송산 김명식", 진보평론, 2 (1999)
- 박종린, "‘김윤식사회장’ 찬반논의와 사회주의세력의 재편", 역사와 현실, 38 (2000)
- 박종린, "1920년대 전반기 사회주의사상의 수용과 물산장려논쟁", 역사와 현실, (47), pp.67~88 (2003), 한국역사연구회
- 박종린, "1920년대 초 공산주의 그룹의 맑스주의 수용과 ‘유물사관요령기’", 역사와 현실, (67), pp.77~100 (2008), 한국역사연구회
- 박종린, "바쿠닌과 슈티르너의 아나키즘과 식민지 조선", 한국동양정치사상사연구, 7(1), pp.27~45 (2008), 한국동양정치사상사학회
- 박종린, "1920년대 전반 사회주의사상의 수용과 맑스주의 원전 번역 ― 『임금 노동과 자본』을 중심으로―", 한국근현대사연구, (51), pp.301~320 (2009), 한국근현대사학회
- 박종린, "1920년대 사회주의사상의 수용과 사회과학연구사", 역사문제연구, 15(2), pp.209~233 (2011), 역사문제연구소
- 박종린, "1920년대 사회주의사상의 수용과 맑스주의 원전 번역: 『임금・가격・이윤』을 중심으로", 한국사상사학, (42), pp.267~293 (2012), 한국사상사학회
- 박종린, "1920년대 사회주의사상의 수용과 『社會主義學說大要』", 역사문화연구, (50), pp.3~38 (2014), 역사문화연구소
- 박종린, "1920년대 사회주의사상의 수용과 맑스주의 원전 번역―≪유토피아에서 과학으로의 사회주의의 발전≫을 중심으로 ―", 한국근현대사연구, (69), pp.37~67 (2014), 한국근현대사학회
- 박종린, "Irw olhoe and the Introduction of Marxism into Korea in the 1920s", Korea Journal, 49(1), pp.33~60 (2009), 유네스코한국위원회
