The Significance of the Concept of Minjung and Changes Thereto: With a Focus on the 1920s
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The term minjung (people) as it started to be used during the 1920s in Korea was defined as the “indefinite majority or all members of the nation” or the “subjugated class.” However, the emergence of the socialist movement resulted in the meaning of minjung becoming one rooted in two stages. Minjung came to include varied meanings such as the “majority of the nation,” “political actors,” and the “illiterates and proletarians” in 1920-1921, and started to contain socialist notions of class by 1922-1923. Accordingly, cultural movement activists, who had interpreted minjung on both idealist and realist levels, began to discuss the term based on the social development theory, focusing on how to actualize socialist idealism under a colonial reality. To this end, socialists started to prefer the vanguard-based notion of daejung (public) from 1925 onwards. The use of the term daejung was further expanded in the 1930s.
Abstract
The term minjung (people) as it started to be used during the 1920s in Korea was defined as the “indefinite majority or all members of the nation” or the “subjugated class.” However, the emergence of the socialist movement resulted in the meaning of minjung becoming one rooted in two stages. Minjung came to include varied meanings such as the “majority of the nation,” “political actors,” and the “illiterates and proletarians” in 1920-1921, and started to contain socialist notions of class by 1922-1923. Accordingly, cultural movement activists, who had interpreted minjung on both idealist and realist levels, began to discuss the term based on the social development theory, focusing on how to actualize socialist idealism under a colonial reality. To this end, socialists started to prefer the vanguard-based notion of daejung (public) from 1925 onwards. The use of the term daejung was further expanded in the 1930s.
참고문헌 (35)
- "Gojong sillok 高宗實錄(Annals of King Gojong)", ~
- "Jeongjo Sillok 正祖實錄 (Annals of King Jeongjo)", ~
- "Seonjo sillok 宣祖實錄 (Annals of King Seonjo)", ~
- "Sunjong Sillok 純宗實錄 (Annals of King Sunjong)", ~
- Bae, Seong-ryong, "Historical Analysis of Social Movements in Joseon", Genesis, 66, pp.22~33 (1926)
- Bak, Dal-seong, "Worshipping at the Grave of Son Uiam", Genesis, 25, pp.97~103 (1922)
- Bujiam, "Intelligentsia: The Social Movement and Intelligent Class", Genesis, 59, pp.8~18 (1925)
- Gangnam Maehwarang, "From Shanghai to Jinling", Genesis, 6, pp.117~126 (1920)
- Haga, Noboru, "Historical Changes in the Concept of People" (1984), Yuzankaku
- Hur, Soo, "Colonial Joseon, the Old Future" (2011), Pureun Yeoksa
- Hur, Soo, "Yi Don-hwa: The Border between Religion and Society" (2011), Yeoksa Bipyeongsa
- Hyeon, Cheol, "Promoting Minjung Theater: An Urgent Task of Cultural Programs", Genesis, 10, pp.107~114 (1921)
- Hyeon, Cheol, "“Hamlet,” by Shakespeare", Genesis, 21, pp.41~42 (1922)
- Jeong, Baek, "An Analysis of the Minjung Spirit", New Life, 1, pp.29~33 (1922)
- Jeong, Gi-won, "Discourses on Hope, Selection of Contest Works", Genesis, 13, pp.9~17 (1921)
- Jeong, In-gyu, "The Principles of Politics in the 20th Century", Genesis, 4, pp.51~54 (1920)
- Jitsugyo no Nihonsha, "A Dictionary Index of New Era Words" (1928), Jitsugyo noNihonsha
- Ju, Jong-geon, "Modern Education and the Minjung", Genesis, 58 (1925)
- Kang, In-taek, "Lecture Critiques", Genesis, 17, pp.55~69 (1921)
- Kim, Gi-jeon, "From Blind Obedience to Negotiation, from Negotiation to Independence", Genesis, 12, pp.2~12 (1921)
- Kim, Gi-jeon, "The First and Second Liberations: The Two Proclamations of Liberation in Human History", Genesis, 32, pp.25~32 (1923)
- Kim, Hak-i., "Rolf Reichardt’s Conceptual History, In (The Horizon and Perspectives of Conceptual History", pp.93~138 (2009), Sohwa
- 김윤희, "근대 국가구성원으로서의 인민 개념 형성(1876~1894) - 民=赤子와 『西遊見聞』의 인민", 역사문제연구, 13(1), pp.295~331 (2009), 역사문제연구소
- Kyoseikaku, "Revised Proletarian Dictionary" (1930), Kyoseikaku
- Lim, Kyongsok, "Disputes between Social Organizations in Seoul during the First Half of 1922 and the Characteristics of These Disputes", Literati, 25, pp.211~240 (2005)
- Matsui, Eiichi, "Dictionary of Modern Terminology" (1995), Ozorasha
- Park, Jongrin, "The Acceptance of Socialist Thought under Japanese Imperialism", 박사, pp.2006
- Park, Myoungkyu, "Gungmin, Inmin, Simin: The Main Actors in Korean Politics as Viewed from the Standpoint of Conceptual History" (2009), Sohwa
- Shin, Baek-u, "Plea for the Emergence of a Trailblazer for the Social Movement", New Life, 2, pp.15~20 (1922)
- TY 生, "The Current State of Social Movement Groups: Organization, Principles, Activities, and Figures", Genesis, 66, pp.44~56 (1926)
- Yi, Cheol, "Being Religious Only after Being Non-Religious", Genesis, 37, pp.30~35 (1923)
- Yi, Don-hwa, "From Chaos to Unification", Genesis, 13, pp.2~12 (1921)
- Yi, Don-hwa, "New Self-Cultivation of the Modern Youth", Genesis, 51, pp.2~7 (1924)
- Yi, Gwang-su, "The Nucleus Class and Society", Genesis, 13, pp.24~31 (1921)
- Yi, Gwang-su, "Theory on the Leader", Eastern Light, 23, pp.8~9 (1931)