補助動詞[てしまう]と[아/어 버리다] －コーパス基盤対照言語学による考察－
te shimau and a/eobeorida: Corpus‐based contrastive analysis on Japanese and Korean auxiliary verbs
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study analyzes differences between te shimau, a Japanese auxiliary verb, and its seeming Korean counterpart, a/eo beorida, based on a corpus‐based contrastive approach. Consideration of the modality aspect of the two auxiliary verbs leads to an assumption that the frequency of their occurrence will differ across text genres. The classification of verbs with the application of Lexical Conceptual Structure helps to form another assumption that the distribution of verbs associated with the auxiliary verbs will reflect their aspectual and modal properties. Log‐likelihood tests on the frequency of occurrence of those auxiliary verbs reveal that te shimau is in significantly disproportionate usage across text genres, which is not always the case with a/eo beorida. Furthermore, the features of co‐occurrence strength between the auxiliary verbs and verbs, in conjunction with Principal Component Analysis based on those features, demonstrate a considerable difference between the two auxiliary verbs in terms of what types of verbs they prefer: te shimau seems to have no restriction on the verb type for connection, while a/eo beorida shows a strong tendency to co‐occur with verbs requiring strong agency. Showing distinctive differences between the two auxiliary verbs that would not otherwise emerge, this study confirms the efficacy of corpus‐based contrastive analyses.
Abstract
This study analyzes differences between te shimau, a Japanese auxiliary verb, and its seeming Korean counterpart, a/eo beorida, based on a corpus‐based contrastive approach. Consideration of the modality aspect of the two auxiliary verbs leads to an assumption that the frequency of their occurrence will differ across text genres. The classification of verbs with the application of Lexical Conceptual Structure helps to form another assumption that the distribution of verbs associated with the auxiliary verbs will reflect their aspectual and modal properties. Log‐likelihood tests on the frequency of occurrence of those auxiliary verbs reveal that te shimau is in significantly disproportionate usage across text genres, which is not always the case with a/eo beorida. Furthermore, the features of co‐occurrence strength between the auxiliary verbs and verbs, in conjunction with Principal Component Analysis based on those features, demonstrate a considerable difference between the two auxiliary verbs in terms of what types of verbs they prefer: te shimau seems to have no restriction on the verb type for connection, while a/eo beorida shows a strong tendency to co‐occur with verbs requiring strong agency. Showing distinctive differences between the two auxiliary verbs that would not otherwise emerge, this study confirms the efficacy of corpus‐based contrastive analyses.
참고문헌 (40)
- 安田吉実, "엣센스日韓辞典" (1996), ソウル民衆書林
- 운평어문연구소, "Kumsung NEW ACE한일사전" (1994), 금성출판사
- 이희경, "「-てしまう」と 「-아", 어 버리다」の構文論的特徵の考察, 2007, pp.60(1), 153~170[DOI]
- 이미숙, "韓·日兩語對照硏究の方法論再考 － 遺憾を表す表現を例にして －", 일본언어문화, 10(10), pp.157~175 (2007), 한국일본언어문화학회
- 石川慎一郎, "コロケーションの強度をどう測るか―ダイス係数、tスコア、相互情報量を中心として―", 言語処理学会, (14), pp.40~50 (2008), 大会チュートリアル資料
- 一色舞子, "日本語の補助動詞｢－てしまう｣の文法化：主観化、間主観化を中心に", 日本研究, 15, pp.201~221 (2011), 北海道大学
- 北研二, "情報検索アルゴリズム" (2002), 共立出版
- 影山太郎, "動詞意味論" (1996), くろしお出版
- 杉本武, "｢てしまう｣におけるアスペクトとモダリティ", 九州工業大学情報工学部紀要 人文, (4), pp.109~126 (1991)
- 杉本武, "｢てしまう｣におけるアスペクトとモダリティ(2)", 九州工業大学情報工学部紀要 人文, (5), pp.61~73 (1992)
- 筒井昭博, "読点の現われを捉えるモデル－主観性・客観性ベクトルの競合という観点から－", 日本研究, (43), pp.387~411 (2010), 한국외국어대학교일본어연구소
- 鄭世桓, "日韓補助動詞の対照研究－日本語の補助動詞テシマウ形式の意味・用法とそれに対応する韓国語の補助動詞をめぐって－", 박사, pp.2007
- 仁田義雄, "現代日本語文のモダリティの体系と構造, In 日本語のモダリティ", pp.1~56 (1989), くろしお出版
- Barnbrook, Geoff, "Language and Computers: A practical introduction to the computer analysis o flanguage" (1996), University Press
- Dowty, David, "Word meaning and montague grammar" (1979), Reidel
- Granger, Sylviane, "The Corpus Approach: a Common Way for CL and TS, In Corpus‐based Approaches to Contrastive Linguistics and Translation Studies", pp.17~29 (2003), Rodopi
- Some transitivity alternations in English, "Hale, Kenneth", Center for Cognitive Science MIT, 1~41, pp.Lexicon Project working papers 7 (1986)
- Hale, Kenneth, "On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations, In The view from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger", pp.53~109 (1993), MIT Press
- Hunston, Susan, "Corpora in Applied linguistics" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Jackendoff, Ray, "Semantic structure" (1990), MIT Press
- Jacobsen, Wesley M, "The transitive structure of events in Japanese" (1992), Kuroshio Publishers
- Johansson, Stig, "Contrastive Linguistics and Corpora, In Corpus‐based Approaches to Contrastive Linguistics and Translation Studies", pp.31~44 (2003), Rodopi
- Jolliffe, I.T, "Principal Component Analysis 2nd Edition" (2002), Springer
- Leech, G, "Word frequencies in written and spoken English: Based on the British National Corpus" (2001), Pearson Education Limited
- Levin, Beth, "Unaccusativity At the Syntax‐Lexical Semantics Interface" (1995), The MIT Press
- McEnery, Tony, "Corpus‐Based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book" (2006), Routledge
- Oakes, Michael P, "Statistics for corpus linguistics" (1998), Edinburgh University Press
- Partington, Alan, "Patterns and Meanings: Using Corpora for English Language Research and Teaching" (1998), John Benjamins
- Perlmutter, David, "Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis", Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.157~189 (1978)
- Pustejovsky, James, "The syntax of event structure", Cognition, 41, pp.47~81 (1991)
- Rayson. Paul, "Extending the Cochran Rule for the Comparison of Word Frequencies between Corpora", Le poids des mots: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Statistical Analysis of Textual Data JADT 2004, pp.926~936 (2004)
- Shibatani, Masayoshi, "Causativization, In Syntax and semantics 5: Japanese Generative Grammar", pp.239~294 (1976), Academic Press
- Sinclair, John, "Corpus, concordance, collocation" (1991), Oxford University Press
- Stubbs, Michael, "Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer‐assisted Studies of Language and Culture" (1996), Blackwell
- Stubbs, Michael, "南出康世・石川慎一郎監訳 『コーパス語彙意味論語から句へ』" (2006), 研究社
- Stubbs, Michael, "The Search for Units of Meaning: Sinclair on Empirical Semantics", Applied Linguistics, 30(1), pp.115~137 (2009), Oxford University
- Svensen, Bo, "A Handbook of Lexicography: The Theory and Practice of Dictionary‐Making" (2009), Cambridge University Press
- Tsutsui, Akihiro, "Japanese Causative Constructions and the Double‐O Constraint" (2000), University of Massachusetts
- Van Valin, Jr., Robert, "Semantic parameters of split in transitivity", Language, 66, pp.221~260 (1990)
- Wengo, Pan, "Contrastive Linguistics: History, Philosophy and Methodology" (2007), Continuum