日韓両言語の補助動詞「てある」「ておく」と「아/어 놓다」 「아/어 두다」の対照研究 ─構文的な特徴を中心に─
A comparative study of auxiliary verbs 「te aru」 「te oku」 and 「a/e nohda · duda」 in Japanese and Korean languages ─ Focusing on syntactic features ─
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, the syntactic characteristics of what kind of similarities and differences exist in the sentences of the auxiliary verbs 「te-aru」「te-oku」and 「a/e nohda · duda」of the Japanese and Korean languages analyzed. As a result, In order to use the 2.3 person in the sentence 「te-aru」and「te-oku」, it is necessary to have specific grammatical means and contextual conditions, but Korean 「a/e nohda · duda」is not restricted by the person. Also Korean 「a/e nohda」can be an inanimate subject of the sentence. A transitive verb will come before the Japanese 「te-aru」「te-oku」and the Korean 「a/e nohda · duda」. However, if it means 「preparation」「accumulation of actions」, it is possible to preface intransitive verbs 「te-aru」「te-oku」and 「a/e nohda · duda」. Among transitive verbs, 「kill」, 「know」and 「have」can be attached to 「te-oku」, but can not come before 「te-aru」. Also, among them, 「hav e」can be connected only before 「te-oku」in Japanese, and the nonverbal verb only precedes the Korean 「a/e nohda. In co-occurrence with adverbial components, when co-occurring with 「already」「yesterday」「toda y」, 「te-aru」appears in the form of a non-past and 「te-oku」is in the form of past appear. And because of the difference in tense, 「tomorrow」can not co-occur with 「te-aru」.
Abstract
In this paper, the syntactic characteristics of what kind of similarities and differences exist in the sentences of the auxiliary verbs 「te-aru」「te-oku」and 「a/e nohda · duda」of the Japanese and Korean languages analyzed. As a result, In order to use the 2.3 person in the sentence 「te-aru」and「te-oku」, it is necessary to have specific grammatical means and contextual conditions, but Korean 「a/e nohda · duda」is not restricted by the person. Also Korean 「a/e nohda」can be an inanimate subject of the sentence. A transitive verb will come before the Japanese 「te-aru」「te-oku」and the Korean 「a/e nohda · duda」. However, if it means 「preparation」「accumulation of actions」, it is possible to preface intransitive verbs 「te-aru」「te-oku」and 「a/e nohda · duda」. Among transitive verbs, 「kill」, 「know」and 「have」can be attached to 「te-oku」, but can not come before 「te-aru」. Also, among them, 「hav e」can be connected only before 「te-oku」in Japanese, and the nonverbal verb only precedes the Korean 「a/e nohda. In co-occurrence with adverbial components, when co-occurring with 「already」「yesterday」「toda y」, 「te-aru」appears in the form of a non-past and 「te-oku」is in the form of past appear. And because of the difference in tense, 「tomorrow」can not co-occur with 「te-aru」.
참고문헌 (16)
- 김성화, "국어의 상 연구", pp.230~248 (2003), 한신문화사
- 이기동, "조동사 ‘놓다’ 의 연구", 한글, 163, pp.488~494 (1979), 한글학회
- 장미라, "한국어 보조 용언의 상적양태적 의미 기능과 통사적 특징", 배달말, (38), pp.33~60 (2006), 배달말학회
- 종소로, "보조용언 '버리다, 놓다, 두다'에 대한 연구", 석사, 국어국문학과, pp.2013
- 菊地康人, "ておく」の分析", 東京大学留学生センター教育研究論集, (15), pp.1~20 (2009)
- 김수영, "日韓両言語の補助動詞「ておく」と「아", 어 놓다·두다」の対照 研究 ─ 構文的な特徴を中心に─, 2018, pp.(77), 5~20[DOI]
- 金英兒, "副詞「あらかじめ」と「前もって」の意味·用法", 日本文化学報, 54, pp.5~17 (2012), 韓国日本学会
- 金水敏, "時·否定と取り立て", pp.44~51 (2000), 岩波書店
- 杉村泰, "テオク構文とテアル構文の非対称について", 語文化論集, 24(2), pp.95~110 (2003), 名古屋大学言語文化部·国際言語文化研究科
- 張賢善, "「∼てある」文と「ておく」文の違いについて─文法構造の観点から─", 言語·地域文化研究, 16, pp.203~213 (2010), 東京外国語大学大学院
- 日本語記述文法研究会, "現代日本語文法③", pp.49~ (2012), くろしお出版
- 허재석, "日本語の「してある」と「しておく」について ― 韓国語の「해 놓다」「해 두다」との対照の観点から ―", 일본학보, (81), pp.87~99 (2009), 한국일본학회
- 益岡隆志, "文化言語学─その提言と建設─", pp.532~546 (1992), 三省堂
- 森田良行, "基礎日本語辞典", pp.94~97 (2007), 角川書店
- 山崎恵, "「ておく」と「てある」の関連性について", 日本語教育, (88号), pp.13~24 (1996), 日本語教育学会
- 吉川武時, "日本語動詞のアスペクト", pp.254~293 (1976), むぎ書房