본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

논어 화제구의 해석과 교육(2)- ‘원인-변화결과’ 사건의미 구의 예를 중심으로 -

Interpretation and Education of Topic Phrase shown on the Analects of Confucius (2) -Based on the Examples of the ‘CAUSE-BECOME’ Eventuality Meaning Phrase-

김종호
중국연구소 (INSTITUTE OF CHINESE STUDIES, Hankuk University of Foreign St)|2020.06|중국연구 (Journal of Sinology and China Studies)|제83권 |pp. 25-46|DOI 10.18077/chss.2020.83..002

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

해석논어Interpretation화제구Analects of Confucius사역 사건의미최소주의 방안TopPCausative eventuality meaningThe Minimalist Program
주제분류중국어와문학

초록

The Chinese language is a topic-prominent language and the ancient form of the language is not an exception. This literature examines the theta roles and cases of the arguments by setting sentence structures regarding ‘TopP’, which marks the eventuality meaning of causative ‘CAUSE-BECOME’, from the Analects of Confucius. Summary of the analysis is as follows: 1. The sentence structure of TopP from the Analects of Confucius that marks the eventuality meaning of causative ‘CAUSE-BECOME’ can be divided into four categories which are: ‘Ti+Si+V+JIANYU(o/s)+[Compl]’, ‘Tj+S+V+JIANYU(o/s)j+ [Compl]’, ‘Tj+S+使+JIANYU(o/s)j+V+[Compl]’, ‘Ti+Si+使+JIANYU(o/s)+V+[Co mpl]’. 2. The predicate(V-v1-v2) of TopP from the Analects of Confucius that marks the eventuality meaning of causative ‘CAUSE-BECOME’ has a meaning characteristics of [+ cause] and [+ become]. 3. The subject of TopP from the Analects of Confucius that marks the eventuality meaning of causative ‘CAUSE-BECOME’ is assigned a thematic role of an <causer>, and the object(JIANYU:兼語) is assigned a thematic role of a <theme>/<experien cer>. 4. The TopP from the Analects of Confucius that marks the eventuality meaning of causative ‘CAUSE-BECOME’ is two types : The one is composed of two covert light verb heads and its complements; The another one is composed of one overt light verb head ‘SHI/使’ and one covert light verb head and their complements. 5. Every argument, which is the subject, object(JIANYU:兼語), complement of TopP from the Analects of Confucius that marks the eventuality meaning of causative ‘CAUSE-BECOME’ can theoretically be moved in front of the subject and be topicalized. 6. The topic phrase from the Analects of Confucius that marks the eventuality meaning of causative ‘CAUSE-BECOME’ is derived in the order of predicate (V-v1 -v2) , [Compl], object(JIANYU:兼語), [adjunct], subject, and topic, but when interpr eting it in Korean it is in inverse order, which is in the order of topic, subject, [adjunct], object(JIANYU:兼語), [Compl] and predicate(V-v1-v2). ‘[ ]’ means option.

Abstract

The Chinese language is a topic-prominent language and the ancient form of the language is not an exception. This literature examines the theta roles and cases of the arguments by setting sentence structures regarding ‘TopP’, which marks the eventuality meaning of causative ‘CAUSE-BECOME’, from the Analects of Confucius. Summary of the analysis is as follows: 1. The sentence structure of TopP from the Analects of Confucius that marks the eventuality meaning of causative ‘CAUSE-BECOME’ can be divided into four categories which are: ‘Ti+Si+V+JIANYU(o/s)+[Compl]’, ‘Tj+S+V+JIANYU(o/s)j+ [Compl]’, ‘Tj+S+使+JIANYU(o/s)j+V+[Compl]’, ‘Ti+Si+使+JIANYU(o/s)+V+[Co mpl]’. 2. The predicate(V-v1-v2) of TopP from the Analects of Confucius that marks the eventuality meaning of causative ‘CAUSE-BECOME’ has a meaning characteristics of [+ cause] and [+ become]. 3. The subject of TopP from the Analects of Confucius that marks the eventuality meaning of causative ‘CAUSE-BECOME’ is assigned a thematic role of an <causer>, and the object(JIANYU:兼語) is assigned a thematic role of a <theme>/<experien cer>. 4. The TopP from the Analects of Confucius that marks the eventuality meaning of causative ‘CAUSE-BECOME’ is two types : The one is composed of two covert light verb heads and its complements; The another one is composed of one overt light verb head ‘SHI/使’ and one covert light verb head and their complements. 5. Every argument, which is the subject, object(JIANYU:兼語), complement of TopP from the Analects of Confucius that marks the eventuality meaning of causative ‘CAUSE-BECOME’ can theoretically be moved in front of the subject and be topicalized. 6. The topic phrase from the Analects of Confucius that marks the eventuality meaning of causative ‘CAUSE-BECOME’ is derived in the order of predicate (V-v1 -v2) , [Compl], object(JIANYU:兼語), [adjunct], subject, and topic, but when interpr eting it in Korean it is in inverse order, which is in the order of topic, subject, [adjunct], object(JIANYU:兼語), [Compl] and predicate(V-v1-v2). ‘[ ]’ means option.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. 김종호, "논어 화제구의 해석과 교육(1) - ‘활동(DO)’ 사건의미 표시구의 예를 중심으로", 중국연구, 79, pp.245~275 (2019), 중국연구소[DOI]
  2. 김종호, "『논어』명구 속 ‘원인-결과’ 사건구조의 이해와 한국어 번역", 중어중문학, (72), pp.1~27 (2018), 한국중어중문학회[DOI]
  3. 김종호, "현대중국어 화제화 이중명사구문 연구" (2011), 한국문화사
  4. 김종호, "현대중국어 화제의 두 위치 해석", 중국언어연구, (71), pp.191~213 (2017), 한국중국언어학회[DOI]
  5. 김종호, "중국어 최소주의 생성문법 13강" (2018), HUINE
  6. 김종호, "공식으로 읽는 논어명구" (2017), HUINE
  7. 김종호, "한문 해석 공식 : 촘스키가 논어를 읽는다면 : 생성문법으로 한문 해석하기" (2019), 한티미디어
  8. Li, "Mandarin Chinese A Functional Reference Grammar" (1981), University of California Press
  9. C.-T. James Huang, "The Syntax of Chinese" (2009), Cambridge University Press
  10. Chomsky, Noam, "lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris Puhlications
  11. Chomsky, Noam, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
  12. Huang, C.-T. James, "Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar", Doctor, pp.1982
  13. Huang, C.-T. James, "On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns", Linguistics Inquiry, 15 (1984)
  14. Huang, C.-T. James, "Remarks on empty categories in Chinese", Linguistic Inquiry, 18 (1987)
  15. Noam Chomsky, "최소주의 언어이론" (2001), 한국문화사
  16. Pan, Haihua, "Licensing dangling topics in Chinese", Paper Presented at the 2002 LSA Annual Meeting (2002)
  17. Radford, Andrew, "Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the structure of English" (2012), Cambridge University Press
  18. Rizzi, Luigi, "Structure and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structure 3" (2004), OUP
  19. Shi, Dingxu, "Topic and topic-comment constructions in Mandarin Chinese", Language, 76(2) (2000)
  20. So-Young Kim, "Topics and Null arguments in Korean: the syntax and discourse", ~ (2006)
  21. 김광섭, "최소주의와 최후의 수단" (2018), 한국문화사
  22. 김용하, "한국어 생성 통사론" (2018), 역락
  23. 陳俊光, "對比分析與敎學應用" (2007), 文鶴出版有限公司
  24. 寧春岩, "생성문법이란 무엇인가" (2015), 한국문화사
  25. 唐景杰, "《朝野僉載》話題句研究", 碩士, pp.2018
  26. 鄧思穎, "形式漢語句法學" (2010), 上海教育出版社
  27. 駱錘煉, "《詩經》代詞“其”和話題的關係—兼論“其”的語法化", 語文研究 (2007)
  28. 劉丹青, "先秦漢語的話題標記和主語-話題之别", 古漢語研究 (2016)
  29. 陸儉明, "現代漢語語法研究教程" (2003), 北京大學出版社
  30. 李强, "古今漢語話題句之比较研究", 碩士, pp.2012
  31. 李强, "上古漢語“主之謂”結構的話題性及相關問題", 古漢語研究 (2017)
  32. 满在江, "DP新假說-最簡方案框架下的子句論元-" (2015), 外語教學與研究出版社
  33. 梅廣, "上古漢語生語法綱要" (2015), 三民書局
  34. 武惠華, "白話論語" (1998), 北京大學出版社
  35. 謝氷瑩, "四書讀本" (1981), 三民書局
  36. 신준호, "Topic-Focus Structure and Quantification of Dou ‘all’", Taiwan Journal of Linguistics (2007), Crane Publishing
  37. 楊伯峻, "論語譯注" (2014), 中華書局
  38. 양세욱, "고대한어의 화제에 대한 연구", 박사, 중어중문학(어학), pp.2005
  39. 熊仲儒, "現代汉语中的致使句式" (2004), 安徽大學出版社
  40. 이강재, "《荀子》의 主題文 硏究", 석사, pp.1992
  41. 蔡維天, "論漢語內、外輕動詞的分布與詮釋", 語言科學, 15(4)통권 : 83 (2016)
  42. 彭吉軍, "《論語》話題結構研究", 博士, pp.2011
  43. 何元建, "現代漢語生成语法" (2011), 北京大學出版社
  44. 許世瑛, "論語二十篇句法硏究" (1973), 開明書店
  45. 黄正德, "漢語動詞的題元結構與其句法表現", 語言科學, 6(4) (2007)
  46. 黄正德, "漢語句法學" (2013), 世界圖書出版公司北京公司

관련 논문AI추천

논어 화제구의 해석과 교육(1) - ‘활동(DO)’ 사건의미 표시구의 예를 중심으로김종호중국연구소 · 중국연구2019 · 제79권 『맹자』 사동 사건의미 구의 생성과 도출 해석김종호중국학연구회 · 중국학연구2022 · 제100호≪左傳≫ 致使性 겸어구문의 분류 및 구문론적 해석박원기중국어문연구회 · 중국어문논총2018 · 제87호≪史記≫ 致使性 겸어구문의 구문론적 해석박원기중국어문연구회 · 중국어문논총2017 · 제83호현대 중국어 사동문과 타동성박은석언어정보연구소 · 언어와 정보 사회2014 · 제21권 『孟子』의 언어학적 연구 -제시주어를 중심으로-유영기중국인문학회 · 중국인문과학2018 · 제68호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)

2000년 이후 韓中 블록버스터에 관한 一考察김정은pp. 3-24戰國楚地文獻 의문대체사 ‘害’,‘曷’의 의미고찰 -『清華簡 · 一』의 두 자형을 중심으로-신세리pp. 47-65朱熹의 ‘自得說’과 문학해석학양충열pp. 67-87현대중국어 동사복사문의 양태 의미 연구윤비취pp. 89-107역외 상장된 중국 기업의 현황과 중국 증시 회귀 문제에 관한 연구구기보pp. 111-132
원문 보기