본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

≪左傳≫ 致使性 겸어구문의 분류 및 구문론적 해석

A Classification & Constructional Analysis of Causative Pivotal Constructions in Zuozhuan

박원기
중국어문연구회 (Chinese Literary Society)|2018.06|중국어문논총 (Journal of Chinese Language and Literature)|제87호|pp. 1-31|DOI 10.26586/chls.2018..87.001

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

classificationZuozhuanconstructionLunyuthematic rolecoercionconstructionalizationcausative pivotal cxnovert causative verbsimplicit causative verbscausative verb typeimplicit causative verb typeconstructional point of viewconstructional changegoal typeresult typegoal-result type
주제분류중국어와문학

초록

The causative pivotal cxn of Chinese has existed since the age of inscriptions on bones and tortoise carapaces. It has come to the period of Zuozhuan and has continued to change and expand. At first, it was formed through constructionalization, and through constructional changes, it became the current figure. At first it was formed in ‘command/dispatch/summons’ type, where it expanded to other forms such as ‘causative’ type, ‘title’ type and ‘appointment’ type. ‘Causative’ type was formed through metaphorical expansion. In this course, the causative pivotal cxn was established in a definite construction, since then, more verbs have joined it. At first, the overt causative verbs are mainstream, later, the implicit causative verbs became involved in this too. But within the causative pivotal cxn of Zouzhuan, there is not implicit causative verbs, and only four types of causative verb type, goal type, result type, goal-result type exist. They became a sort of sub-schema within a larger schema – the causative pivotal cxn of Chinese. Lunyu is contemporary with Zouzhuan, so we compared it to Zouzhuan and concluded the following conclusions. Fist of all, the participating verbs of two literatures were nearly alike. ‘Shi1’, ‘Shi2’, ‘Qing’ have high token frequency rates in these two literatures, and neither were implicit causative verb type. Its existence implies the maturity of the causative pivotal cxn. Through the construction coercion, the thematic role of a atypical verbs change, eventually they became members of this construction. The implicit causative verb type of Chinese has been born for centuries since Zuozhuan. We can discover the development process of an implicit causative verb type by studying the literatures of the Age of the Warring states.

Abstract

The causative pivotal cxn of Chinese has existed since the age of inscriptions on bones and tortoise carapaces. It has come to the period of Zuozhuan and has continued to change and expand. At first, it was formed through constructionalization, and through constructional changes, it became the current figure. At first it was formed in ‘command/dispatch/summons’ type, where it expanded to other forms such as ‘causative’ type, ‘title’ type and ‘appointment’ type. ‘Causative’ type was formed through metaphorical expansion. In this course, the causative pivotal cxn was established in a definite construction, since then, more verbs have joined it. At first, the overt causative verbs are mainstream, later, the implicit causative verbs became involved in this too. But within the causative pivotal cxn of Zouzhuan, there is not implicit causative verbs, and only four types of causative verb type, goal type, result type, goal-result type exist. They became a sort of sub-schema within a larger schema – the causative pivotal cxn of Chinese. Lunyu is contemporary with Zouzhuan, so we compared it to Zouzhuan and concluded the following conclusions. Fist of all, the participating verbs of two literatures were nearly alike. ‘Shi1’, ‘Shi2’, ‘Qing’ have high token frequency rates in these two literatures, and neither were implicit causative verb type. Its existence implies the maturity of the causative pivotal cxn. Through the construction coercion, the thematic role of a atypical verbs change, eventually they became members of this construction. The implicit causative verb type of Chinese has been born for centuries since Zuozhuan. We can discover the development process of an implicit causative verb type by studying the literatures of the Age of the Warring states.

참고문헌 (52)

  1. 김종도, "인지문법의 디딤돌" (2002), 박이정
  2. 박원기, "‘落得’의 구문화와 구문변화", 중국어문논총, (75), pp.1~38 (2016), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
  3. 박원기, "근대 중국어 금지성 부사 ‘省’ 및 ‘省可(裏)’의 구문화", 중국어문논총, (77), pp.31~65 (2016), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
  4. 박원기, "≪史記≫ 致使性 겸어구문의 확정 및 분류 문제 고찰", 중국어문논총, (81), pp.1~42 (2017), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
  5. 박원기, "≪史記≫ 致使性 겸어구문의 구문론적 해석", 중국어문논총, (83), pp.1~36 (2017), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
  6. 辻幸夫, "인지언어학 키워드 사전" (2004), 한국문화사
  7. 程亞恒, "＜左傳＞兼語句硏究", 碩士, pp.2006
  8. 程亞恒, "古漢語兼語句中的若干問題", 語文學刊, (9), pp.102~104 (2007)
  9. 杜煥君, "＜戰國策＞兼語句硏究", 碩士, pp.2003
  10. 范 曉, "语法研究與探索(十)" (2000), 中国语文杂志社
  11. 何樂士, "史記語法特點硏究" (2005), 商務印書館
  12. 解惠全, "古書虛詞通解" (2008), 中華書局
  13. 李佐豊, "上古漢語語法硏究" (2003), 北京廣播學院出版社
  14. 林 琳, "上古使令类兼语动词的演进和发展", 碩士, pp.2010
  15. 劉世英, "漢語兼語結構的象似性探討", 渝西學院學報, (4), pp.59~62 (2002)
  16. 劉鑫鑫, "上古漢語中的兼語句", 碩士, pp.2008
  17. 劉永耕, "使令度和使令類動詞的再分類", 語言硏究, (2), pp.8~13 (2000)
  18. 劉永耕, "使令動詞和致使詞", 新彊大學學報, (1), pp.93~96 (2013)
  19. 劉月華, "實用現代漢語語法" (2003), 商務印書館
  20. 劉振平, "也談“使”的語義演變和語法化", 信陽師範學院學報, (3), pp.112~116 (2016)
  21. 毆陽小英, "≪論語≫, ≪孟子≫兼語句考察", 牡丹江大学学报, (7), pp.29~34 (2009)
  22. 申惠仁, "浅析现代汉语致使结構", 現代語文, (11), pp.75~77 (2012)
  23. 司馬遷, "史記" (2006), 中華書局
  24. 孫書杰, "先秦兩漢新兼語式的發展及其影響", 河北大學學報, (3), pp.56~61 (2015)
  25. 宛新政, "現代漢語致使句硏究" (2005), 浙江大學出版社
  26. 王 演, "構式語法硏究(上卷): 理論思索" (2011), 上海外語敎育出版社
  27. 王志敬, "藏漢語古今兼語結構格局比較", 西藏大學學報, (2), pp.109~111 (2006)
  28. 熊仲儒, "現代漢語中的致使句式" (2004), 安徽大學出版社
  29. 徐 丹, "語法化與語法硏究(一)", pp.224~238 (2003), 商務印書館
  30. 許嘉璐, "二十四史全譯" (2004), 漢語大詞典出版社
  31. 許 萌, "從題元理論看現代漢語兼語句", 語言應用硏究, pp.50~51 (2011)
  32. 楊伯峻, "古漢語語法及其發展" (2001), 語文出版社
  33. 楊大然, "兼語句的語義分類及其空語類的句法分布", 解放軍外國語學院學報, (1), pp.23~28 (2006)
  34. 楊 哲, "兼語構式淺析", 文敎資料, pp.23~24 (2010)
  35. 游汝杰, "現代漢語兼語句的句法和語義特徵", 漢語學習, (6), pp.1~6 (2002)
  36. 于 濤, "論古代漢語“請”字句", 社會科學家, (3), pp.200~202 (2007)
  37. 張虹倩, "淺議“敎”的語法化", 伊犁師範學院學報, (2), pp.91~95 (2010)
  38. 張建中, "≪史記≫的使動用法和“使” “令”兼語式", 廣西師範大學學報, (4), pp.33~41 (1990)
  39. 張玉金, "甲骨文語法學" (2001), 學林出版社
  40. 張玉金, "論殷墟甲骨文中的兼語句", 古籍整理硏究學刊, (1), pp.51~59 (2003)
  41. 張玉金, "西周漢語語法硏究" (2004), 商務印書館
  42. 鄭繼娥, "甲骨文中的連動句和兼語句", 古漢語硏究, (2), pp.29~31 (1996)
  43. 周正潁, "今文≪尙書≫兼語句硏究", 古漢語硏究, (1), pp.41~48 (2005)
  44. 漢語大詞典編纂委員會, "漢語大詞典" (1995), 漢語大詞典出版社
  45. 中國社會科學院語言硏究所詞典編輯室, "現代漢語詞典" (2005), 商務印書館
  46. Adele E. Goldberg, "Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure" (1995), The University of Chicago Press
  47. Adele E. Goldberg, "Constructions at Work" (2006), Oxford University Press
  48. Elizabeth C. Traugott, "Regularity in Semantic Change" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  49. Elizabeth C. Traugott, "Constructionalization and Constructional Changes" (2013), Oxford University Press
  50. G, Lakoff, "인지 의미론" (1995), 한국문화사
  51. Vyvyan Evans, "인지언어학의 기초" (2008), 한국문화사
  52. William Croft, "Radical Construction Grammar" (2001), Oxford University Press

관련 논문AI추천

≪史記≫ 致使性 겸어구문의 구문론적 해석박원기중국어문연구회 · 중국어문논총2017 · 제83호≪後漢書≫ 致使性 겸어구문의 분류박원기중국어문연구회 · 중국어문논총2019 · 제93호중고중국어 致使性 겸어구문의 구문론적 해석박원기중국어문연구회 · 중국어문논총2021 · 제105호≪史記≫ 致使性 겸어구문의 확정 및 분류 문제 고찰박원기중국어문연구회 · 중국어문논총2017 · 제81호중고중국어 ‘V+(O)+令/使+(O)+XP’구문의 구문론적 해석박원기중국어문연구회 · 중국어문논총2020 · 제99호고대중국어 동사화의 내포동사 분석이소동중국어문연구회 · 중국어문논총2019 · 제91호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

현대중국어 사건 명사 小考 ― 사건 명사의 범주와 의미 전이를 중심으로김영민pp. 33-51변화와 지속: ≪聊齋志異≫에 대한 ≪醒夢駢言≫의 改編 연구 ― 서사내용의 ‘첨가’와 ‘삭제’를 중심으로김명구pp. 53-97五言과 七言의 변주곡김상호pp. 99-124‘物’의 세계: 南宋 지리서가 구성한 ‘海外’와 그 의미최수경pp. 125-168明代 여성의 일상과 질병, 의료행위에 대한 고찰 ― 談允賢의 ≪女醫雜言≫을 중심으로김지선pp. 169-195
원문 보기