남중국해 분쟁과 미중의 전략적 경쟁
The Strategic Competition of U.S. and China in the South China Sea
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this article is to analyze the Strategic Competition of U.S. and China in the South China Sea. For this purpose this article is to examine the implications of power politics in the South China Sea disputes, which basically involve the United States, and other claimant countries, such as Vietnam and the Philippines on one side, and China on the other. The two main actors, namely China and the United States, appear to be re-assertive. The fall-out is the polarization of the stakeholders and greater military build-up. Overt military confrontation is a remote possibility at the moment, mainly because of overriding considerations, such as interdependence in economy and a trend towards regionalism. Nevertheless, the array of sophisticated military forces and the vital national interests of the stakeholders in the Sea tend to portend a problematic frontier. This article indicates certain policy implications and attempts to develop the framework of a scenario that is likely to emerge premised on power politics.
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to analyze the Strategic Competition of U.S. and China in the South China Sea. For this purpose this article is to examine the implications of power politics in the South China Sea disputes, which basically involve the United States, and other claimant countries, such as Vietnam and the Philippines on one side, and China on the other. The two main actors, namely China and the United States, appear to be re-assertive. The fall-out is the polarization of the stakeholders and greater military build-up. Overt military confrontation is a remote possibility at the moment, mainly because of overriding considerations, such as interdependence in economy and a trend towards regionalism. Nevertheless, the array of sophisticated military forces and the vital national interests of the stakeholders in the Sea tend to portend a problematic frontier. This article indicates certain policy implications and attempts to develop the framework of a scenario that is likely to emerge premised on power politics.
참고문헌 (49)
- 김석수, "남중국해 분쟁의 국제관계 - 파라셀과 스프래틀리군도 분쟁을 중심으로 -", 국가안보와 전략, 10(4), pp.257~286 (2010), 국가안보전략연구원
- 김석우, "현대 국제정치 핵심논쟁 12제", pp.254~ (2001), 오름
- 문정인, "중국의 내일을 묻다", pp.31~ (2010), 삼성경제연구소
- 박광희, "21세기의 세계질서(변혁시대의 적응논리)", pp.63~ (2003), 오름
- 박사명, "동남아의 정치변동의 동학", pp.225~ (2004)
- 제레미 블랙, "전쟁은 왜 일어나는가", pp.311~ (2003), 이가서
- 중국 관련 주요 통계(2010년 말 현재), "외교통상부", :외교통상부, ~ (2011)
- 최원목, "국제법 강의", pp.21~ (2007), 이화여자대학교출판부
- 하영선, "변환의 세계정치", pp.74~ (2007), 을유문화사
- Aaron L. Friedberg, "The Future of U.S.–China Relations: Is Conflict Inevitable?", International Security, 30(2), pp.26~ (2005)
- A. F. K Organski, "World Politics" (1958), Knopf
- A. F. K. Organski, "The WarLedger", pp.18~28 (1980), University of Chicago Press
- Aileen San Pablo-Baveria, "The South China Sea Disputes: Is Aquino Way the ‘ASEAN Way’?", RSIS Commentaries, ~ (2012)
- Amitav Acharya, "Power Shift or Paradigm Shift? China’s Rise and Asia’s Emerging Security Order", International Studies Quarterly, 58, pp.158~173 (2014)
- Carnes Lord, "Rebalancing U.S. Forces: Basing and Forward Presence in the Asia-Pacific", pp.37~ (2014), Maryland Naval Institute Press
- By Invitation, Mostly: the International Politics of the US Security Presence, China, and the South China Sea, "Christopher Freise", RSIS, 17~, pp.247 (2012)
- Hengxin Pan, "Is the South China Sea a New ‘Dangerous Ground’ for U.S.–China Rivalry?", East Asia Forum (2011)
- Ian Storey, "Cooperation from Strength: The United States, China, and the South China Sea", pp.63~ (2012), Center for a New American Security
- "Information Office of the State Council, China’s-National-Defense 2010", Information Office of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China(31 March), ~ (2011)
- Jack S. Levy, "Prospect Theory, Rational Choice, and International Relations", International Studies Quarterly, 41(1) (1997)
- James Dobbins, "War with China", Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 54(4), pp.12~ (2012)
- Joseph Bafumi, "International Polarity and America’s Polarization", International Politics, 49, pp.24~ (2012)
- Kishore Mahbubani, "Obama’s Chance to Fashion a New Global Order", Financial Times(7 November), ~ (2012)
- Chinese Debates of South China Sea Policy: Implications for Future Developments, "Li Mingjian", RSIS, 4~, pp.239 (2012)
- Martin A. Smith, "in the Changing Global Order: The US, Russia and China", pp.39~ (2012), Polity Press
- Michael Miller, "The Reaction of Small States to the Advancement of the People's Republic of China in the South China Sea", pp.2013
- Min-Hyung Kim, "Why Does A Small Power Lead? ASEAN Leadership in Asia-Pacific Regionalism", Pacific Focus, 27(1), pp.111~134 (2012), 국제관계연구소[DOI]
- M. Taylor Fravel, "Cooperation from Strength: The United States, China, and the South China Sea", pp.42~ (2012), Center for a New American Security
- Nguyen Hong Thao, "A New Legal Arrangement for the South China Sea?", Ocean Development & International Law, 40(4), pp.333~ (2009)
- Nien-Tsu Alfred Hu, "South China Sea: Troubled Sea or A Sea of Opportunity?", Ocean Development and International Law, 41(3), pp.204~ (2010)
- Oshua Kurlantzick, "Growing U.S. Role in South China Sea", Council on Foreign Relations (11 October), ~ (2011)
- Patrick M. Cronin, "Cooperation from Strength: The United States, China, and the South China Sea", pp.12~ (2012), Center for a New American Security
- "Philippines Takes China Island Dispute to UN Tribunal", Voice of America (22 January 2013), ~ (2013)
- Renato Cruz De Castro, "The Risk of Applying Realpolitik in Resolving the South China Sea Dispute: Implications on Regional Security", Pacific Focus, 27(2), pp.262~289 (2012), 국제관계연구소
- Richard A., Bitzinger, "Sea Battle: Old Wine in New Bottles?", RSIS Commentaries(23 August), ~ (2012)
- Ristian Atriandi Supriyanto, "U.S. Pivots to Maritime Southeast Asia", RSIS Commentaries(22 May), ~ (2012)
- Robert Beckman, "The China-Philippines Dispute in the South China Sea: Does Beijing have a Legitimate Claim?", East Asia Forum(28 March), ~ (2012)
- Robert D. Kaplan, "The South China Sea Is the Future of Conflict: The 21st Century’s Defining Battleground Is Going to Be on Water", Foreign Policy(September, 2011
- Robert Gilpin, "The Theory of Hegemonic War", The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18, pp.591~613 (1988)
- Robert J. Art, "The United States and the Rise of China: Implications for the Long Haul", Political Science Quarterly, 125(3), pp.359~391 (2010)
- Robert M Gates, "Strengthening Security Partnerships in the Asia-Pacific" (2010), The IISS Asia Security Summit
- Rowan Scarborough, "Navy Readies for Chinese Power Grab on Shipping: US Boosts Forces in Western Pacific", Washington Post(10 January), ~ (2012)
- Sam Bateman, "Solving the ‘Wicked Problem’ of Maritime Security: Are Regional Forums Up to the Task?", Contemporary Southeast Asia, 33(1), pp.2~ (2011)
- Sam Bateman, "Increasing Competition in the South China Sea: Need for a New Game Plan", RSIS Commentaries (21 August), ~ (2012)
- Michael Miller, "The Reaction of Small States to the Advancement of the People's Republic of China in the South China Sea", pp.2013
- The South China Sea Dispute: Prospects for Preventive Diplomacy, "Scott Snyder", The United States Institute of Peace, ~, pp.18 (1996)
- ToshiYoshihara, "Can China Defend a ‘Core Interest’ in the South China Sea?", The Washington Quarterly, 34(2), pp.45~ (2011)
- Trevor Taylor, "Approaches and Theory in International Relations", pp.122~140 (1978), Longman
- Vesna Danilovic, "When the Stakes Are High: Deterrence and Conflict among Major Powers" (2002), University of Michigan Press