사회언어적 능력의 관점에서 본 본문 회화의 실제와 과제
The Status quo and further issues of 「Conversations in Textbooks」 in terms of Sociolinguistic competence.
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study will serve as a previous step taken for offering “Syllabus for building Sociolinguistic competence”, in which the conversation extracts from Japanese textbooks being used in University were reflected and analyzed. The important implications are as follows. (1) 60.2% of cases are impossible to discern what the characters' relationship is, while 39.7% are discernable through the context. (2) Places of conversations taking place are not detailed as 71.1% of the total. (3) In the case of conversational patterns and topics appearing in textbook, the conversation form, conversational partners taking their turns, takes up 83.3%, whereas one-side Q & A form, one side asking question to the other and yet not vise versa, is shown only 16.7%. And more than 60% of topics are adopted from places and everyday staff regardless of the conversation patterns of textbooks. (4) As for the formality level of conversations in textbooks, Des․Mas forms are found the most as 82.5%, followed by non-Des․Mas form employed partly as 11.0%, and then non-Des form and non-Mas form are seen, accounting for 4.5%. Finally level shift as in Des․Mas form into non-Des․non-Mas (that is, from more formal form to less formal form and vise versa) comes out as merely 2.0%. Inflecting the status quo the above, it brings us to a point at which we need to consider the further issues as follows. (1) It is necessary that the relationships between the characters in conversation involve the degree of acquaintance, closeness, hierarchy as well as their genders in more detailed fashion. Especially, just not simply revealing surname and given name for suggesting genders, more male and female languages should be imbedded in conversation in an appropriate manner, leading to more learning experiences. Furthermore, when it comes to degree of closeness, there should be a list defining clear and accurate descriptions such as “very close or not that close” And, last but not least, there is the need that we consider and create a balance in terms of social or age-related hierarchical relationship. (2) There is the need to increase opportunities to practice the gaps of Japanese expressions depending on where conversations take place in the public place or private place, not to mention the specific place name. (3) It is assumed that the adjustment in using Des․Mas form or non-Des․Mas form is significantly critical in accordance with conversational partners so that their usages may be appropriate.
Abstract
This study will serve as a previous step taken for offering “Syllabus for building Sociolinguistic competence”, in which the conversation extracts from Japanese textbooks being used in University were reflected and analyzed. The important implications are as follows. (1) 60.2% of cases are impossible to discern what the characters' relationship is, while 39.7% are discernable through the context. (2) Places of conversations taking place are not detailed as 71.1% of the total. (3) In the case of conversational patterns and topics appearing in textbook, the conversation form, conversational partners taking their turns, takes up 83.3%, whereas one-side Q & A form, one side asking question to the other and yet not vise versa, is shown only 16.7%. And more than 60% of topics are adopted from places and everyday staff regardless of the conversation patterns of textbooks. (4) As for the formality level of conversations in textbooks, Des․Mas forms are found the most as 82.5%, followed by non-Des․Mas form employed partly as 11.0%, and then non-Des form and non-Mas form are seen, accounting for 4.5%. Finally level shift as in Des․Mas form into non-Des․non-Mas (that is, from more formal form to less formal form and vise versa) comes out as merely 2.0%. Inflecting the status quo the above, it brings us to a point at which we need to consider the further issues as follows. (1) It is necessary that the relationships between the characters in conversation involve the degree of acquaintance, closeness, hierarchy as well as their genders in more detailed fashion. Especially, just not simply revealing surname and given name for suggesting genders, more male and female languages should be imbedded in conversation in an appropriate manner, leading to more learning experiences. Furthermore, when it comes to degree of closeness, there should be a list defining clear and accurate descriptions such as “very close or not that close” And, last but not least, there is the need that we consider and create a balance in terms of social or age-related hierarchical relationship. (2) There is the need to increase opportunities to practice the gaps of Japanese expressions depending on where conversations take place in the public place or private place, not to mention the specific place name. (3) It is assumed that the adjustment in using Des․Mas form or non-Des․Mas form is significantly critical in accordance with conversational partners so that their usages may be appropriate.
참고문헌 (13)
- 이순형, "일본어 운용력 양성을 위한 문법 실러버스의 제안― 자연담화 특징「한 문장의 길이가 짧다」와「생략이 많다」를 중심으로 ―", 일어일문학연구, 73(1), pp.397~415 (2010), 한국일어일문학회
- 이순형, "일본어 운용력 양성을 위한 문법 실러버스의 재구성-「본문 회화」와 「자연담화」의 비교 분석을 통하여-", 일어일문학연구, 76(1), pp.331~350 (2011), 한국일어일문학회
- 岡崎志津子, "日本語会話教育におけるストラテジー指導", 東京国際大学論叢 商学部, (40), pp.87~101 (1989), 東京国際大学商学部論叢編集委員会
- 現代日本語研究会, "女性のことば․職場編" (1997), ひつじ書房
- 現代日本語研究会, "男性のことば․職場編" (2002), ひつじ書房
- 小林ミナ, "コミュニケーションに役立つ日本語教育文法 In コミュニケーションのための日本語教育文法", pp.23~42 (2005), くろしお出版
- 谷口すみ子, "会話教育のシラバス作りに向けて—会話の技術のリスト試案—", 日本語教育, (68), pp.259~266 (1989), 日本語教育学会
- 日本語教育学会, "日本語教育機関におけるコースデザインの方法とコース運営上の教師集団の役割の分担に関する調査研究", ~ (1988)
- 斉藤里美, "日本語教育における疑問文․質問文—コミュニケーション上の機能からみた日本語教材の課題—", 日本語学, 8(8), pp.41~56 (1989), 明治書院
- 野田尚史, "コミュニケーションに役立つ日本語教育文法 In コミュニケーションのための日本語教育文法", pp.1~20 (2005), くろしお出版
- 野田尚史, "日本語非母語話者の待遇コミュニケーション─デスマス形と非デスマス形の運用を中心に─", 待遇コミュニケーション研究, (6), pp.113~126 (2009), 待遇コミュニケーション学会
- 国語に関する世論調査 平成七年度四月調査, "文化庁", 大蔵省印刷局, ~ (1995)
- Canale, M, "Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing", Applied Linguistics, 1(1), pp.1~47 (1980)
