본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

An Analysis of Interlocutors' Role Realtionships in Textbook Diaglogs

2

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study aimed to analyze textbook dialogs focusing on the distribution of the interlocutors’ role relationships and pragmatic inappropriateness with respect to interlocutors’ social power, social distance and gender. A total of 15 middle school English textbooks were analyzed. Results showed that with respect to social power, there was over-presentation of the dialogs between interlocutors of equal status, with little attention to the dialogs between persons of unequal status. A similar trend was evident with respect to social distance since there was heavy reliance on the dialogs between interlocutors whose familiarity was neutral, with the minimal presentation of the dialogs between intimates and between strangers. With respect to the gender variable, a majority of textbook dialogs did not include information about interlocutors’ gender. A qualitative analysis yielded various facets of pragmatic inappropriateness. With respect to social power, a speaker’s choice of language was found to be inappropriate sometimes to a younger person, sometimes to an equal and sometimes to an older person. Various aspects of pragmatic inappropriateness were also manifested with respect to social distance, showing mismatch between the familiarity between interlocutors and their choice of language. However, there was only one aspect of pragmatic inappropriateness with respect to gender. On the basis of these results, pedagogical implications are discussed, together with helpful suggestions.

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze textbook dialogs focusing on the distribution of the interlocutors’ role relationships and pragmatic inappropriateness with respect to interlocutors’ social power, social distance and gender. A total of 15 middle school English textbooks were analyzed. Results showed that with respect to social power, there was over-presentation of the dialogs between interlocutors of equal status, with little attention to the dialogs between persons of unequal status. A similar trend was evident with respect to social distance since there was heavy reliance on the dialogs between interlocutors whose familiarity was neutral, with the minimal presentation of the dialogs between intimates and between strangers. With respect to the gender variable, a majority of textbook dialogs did not include information about interlocutors’ gender. A qualitative analysis yielded various facets of pragmatic inappropriateness. With respect to social power, a speaker’s choice of language was found to be inappropriate sometimes to a younger person, sometimes to an equal and sometimes to an older person. Various aspects of pragmatic inappropriateness were also manifested with respect to social distance, showing mismatch between the familiarity between interlocutors and their choice of language. However, there was only one aspect of pragmatic inappropriateness with respect to gender. On the basis of these results, pedagogical implications are discussed, together with helpful suggestions.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Banerjee, J, "Tuck in your shirt. You squid: Suggestions in ESL", Language Learning, 38(3), pp.313~364 (1988)
  2. Bardovi-Harlig, K, "Congruence in native and nonnative conversations", Language Learning, 40(4), pp.467~501 (1990)
  3. Beebe, L. M, "Do You have a bag?: Social status and pattern variation in second language acquisition, In Variation in second language acquisition: Discourse, pragmatics and communication", pp.103~125 (1989), Multilingual Matters
  4. Beebe, L. M, "Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals, In Developing communicative competence in a second language" (1990), Newbury House
  5. Bell, N, "Politeness in the speech of Korean ESL learners", Penn Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 14(1), pp.25~47 (1998)
  6. Boxer, D, "Social distance and speech behavior: The case of indirect complaints", Journal of Pragmatics, 19(2), pp.103~125 (1993)
  7. Boxer, D, "Ethnographic interviewing as a research tool in speech act analysis: The case of complaints, In Speech acts across cultures: Challenges to communication as a second language", pp.217~239 (1996), Mouton de Gruyter
  8. Boxer, D, "Problems in the presentation of speech acts in ELT materials: The case of complaints", ELT Journal, 49(1), pp.44~58 (1995)
  9. Brown, P, "Politeness: Some universals in language usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
  10. Chang, Y, "Middle School English 1" (2011), Neunglyule Education
  11. Chang, Y, "Middle School English 2" (2011), Neunglyule Education
  12. Chang, Y, "Middle School English 3" (2011), Neunglyule Education
  13. Herbert, R, "Sex-based differences in compliment behavior", Language in Society, 19, pp.201~224 (1990)
  14. Holmes, J, "Sex differences and apologies: One aspect of communicative competence", Applied Linguistics, 10(2), pp.194~213 (1989)
  15. Holmes, J, "Women, men, and politeness" (1995), Longman
  16. Jung, E.-H, "Exploring textbooks and methods for teaching communicative functions", English Language and Literature, 49(5), pp.1005~1020 (2003)
  17. 정은혁, "Requesting by Korean EFL University Learners with Respect to Power", 영어영문학, 51(5), pp.1133~1152 (2005), 한국영어영문학회
  18. 정은혁, "The Effect of Social Familiarity on the Native and Nonnative English Speakers' Request Speech Acts", 영어학연구, 20(20), pp.181~201 (2005), 한국영어학학회
  19. Kim, D, "Middle School English 1" (2011), Chunjae Education
  20. Kim, D, "Middle school english 2" (2010), 천재교육
  21. Kim, D, "Middle School English 3" (2011), 천재교육
  22. Kim, I, "Middle School English 1" (2011), Kyohaksa
  23. Kim, I, "Middle School English 2" (2011), Kyohaksa
  24. Kim, I, "Middle School English 3" (2011), 교학사
  25. Kim, R, "Teaching politeness in English speech acts", English Teaching, 51(4), pp.3~34 (1996)
  26. Lee, B, "Middle School English 1" (2011), Doosan
  27. Lee, B, "Middle School English 2" (2011), Doosan
  28. Lee, B, "Middle School English 3" (2011), Doosan
  29. Lee, D, "Middle School English 1" (2011), Jihaksa
  30. Lee, D, "Middle School English 2" (2011), Jihaksa
  31. Lee, D, "Middle School English 3" (2011), Jihaksa
  32. 이희경, "Sociocultural Appropriateness in Korean Middle School English Textbooks", 영어학연구, (26), pp.215~240 (2008), 한국영어학학회
  33. Min, S, "Gender and politeness in second language learning. The case of Korean learners of English", English Language Teaching, 10, pp.141~154 (1999)
  34. Olshtain, E, "Apologies across cultures, In Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies", pp.155~173 (1989), Ablex
  35. Richards, J, "Curriculum development in language teaching" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  36. Tarone, E, "Sociolinguistic approaches to second language acquisition research", The Modern Language Journal, 91, pp.837~848 (2007)
  37. Wolfson, N, "The Bulge: A theory of speech behavior and social distance, In Second language discourse: A textbook of current research", pp.21~38 (1988), Ablex

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)