대학교의 일본어 교재에 나타나는 사회어용론적인 오용의 분석과 평가
An Analysis and Evaluation of Sociopragmatic Failures in the Texts for Japanese Language at University Classroom
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, we analyze the Sociopragmatic Failures apparent in a basic Japanese textbook, and examine evaluations of levels of comprehensibility, irritation, and naturalness that may arise from these errors. The major results are listed in the following: (1)Several Sociopragmatic Failures exist in the average beginner's Japanese textbook. Of notable mention are the awkward phrases that a store clerk might say to a customer. (2)There exist large differences in the various ways of correcting such awkward phrases between Korean learners of Japanese and Japanese natives. (3)There also exist large differences in corrections amongst Japanese natives as well. (4)Korean learners of Japanese are more lenient than their native counterparts when it comes to evaluating the errors based on the criteria listed above. (5)Both Korean learners of Japanese and native speakers evaluate naturalness more strictly than irritation, and irritation more strictly than comprehensibility, and also tend to be similar when it comes to problems.
Abstract
In this study, we analyze the Sociopragmatic Failures apparent in a basic Japanese textbook, and examine evaluations of levels of comprehensibility, irritation, and naturalness that may arise from these errors. The major results are listed in the following: (1)Several Sociopragmatic Failures exist in the average beginner's Japanese textbook. Of notable mention are the awkward phrases that a store clerk might say to a customer. (2)There exist large differences in the various ways of correcting such awkward phrases between Korean learners of Japanese and Japanese natives. (3)There also exist large differences in corrections amongst Japanese natives as well. (4)Korean learners of Japanese are more lenient than their native counterparts when it comes to evaluating the errors based on the criteria listed above. (5)Both Korean learners of Japanese and native speakers evaluate naturalness more strictly than irritation, and irritation more strictly than comprehensibility, and also tend to be similar when it comes to problems.
참고문헌 (10)
- 趙南星, "일본어의 오용 분석" (2006), 보고사
- 李範錫, "韓の大における第2外國語としての日本語材の分析", 57輯(1), pp.321~339 (2006), 韓國日語日文學會
- "고등학교 일본어 교과서의 부자연스러운 표현", 53輯, pp.349~373 (2005), 韓國日語日文學會
- "고등학교 일본어 교과서의 のだ 오용에 대하여", 8집, pp.173~191 (2005), 동북아시아문화학회
- 目秋子, "韓高校科書における語用上の誤りの分析と評", 1, pp.57~75 (1999), 東アジア日本語育日本文化究
- "韓の高校の日本語科書に見られる誤りの分析と評", 12(2), pp.183~200 (1995)
- 恒雄, "韓の高校日本語科書における不適切な話文の分析(談話分析の点による分析)" (2001)
- 李佐知子奈理, "初級日本語テキストに見られる話練習の傾向", 12집, pp.113~130 (2005), 한국일본어학회
- 판-쇄, "[ABC…는 교재의 종류"
- "1000円 (1)おあずかりしました。30円のおかえしです。<A, 2003(1), 2005(2-2):56" (2005)
