The Origin of the Reformist Intellectuals’ Self-Deprecating Mentality: Effects of the Progressive Conception of Time in Late Nineteenth-Century Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study explores the origin of Korean reformist intellectuals’ self-deprecating attitude towards their past, and these intellectuals’ viewpoints of the seemingly contrasting values of munmyeong gaehwa 文明開化(civilization and enlightenment) and of the nation. Concerning the origin of the reformists’negative view of their past, a number of scholars have ascribed it to the effects of social Darwinism. This study, however, finds it in the modern conception of time and specifically in the Enlightenment’s progressive view of time. This view of time prompted the reformist intellectuals to place more weight on the future than the past. The past was regarded as the state of being less developed and less progressed and the present as the time to be devoted to accomplish an enlightened future. The Korean reformist intellectuals’ negative view of their past arose from this conception of time. This notion of time provided the reformists with a deontological view of munmyeong gaehwa. However, they did not pursue munmyeong gaehwa at the expense of national independence. Contrary to previous studies, this study proposes that most of the reformist intellectuals balanced between the two values at least until the 1890s. In order to analyze these points, this study draws on the discourse of Dongnip sinmun (The Independent).
Abstract
This study explores the origin of Korean reformist intellectuals’ self-deprecating attitude towards their past, and these intellectuals’ viewpoints of the seemingly contrasting values of munmyeong gaehwa 文明開化(civilization and enlightenment) and of the nation. Concerning the origin of the reformists’negative view of their past, a number of scholars have ascribed it to the effects of social Darwinism. This study, however, finds it in the modern conception of time and specifically in the Enlightenment’s progressive view of time. This view of time prompted the reformist intellectuals to place more weight on the future than the past. The past was regarded as the state of being less developed and less progressed and the present as the time to be devoted to accomplish an enlightened future. The Korean reformist intellectuals’ negative view of their past arose from this conception of time. This notion of time provided the reformists with a deontological view of munmyeong gaehwa. However, they did not pursue munmyeong gaehwa at the expense of national independence. Contrary to previous studies, this study proposes that most of the reformist intellectuals balanced between the two values at least until the 1890s. In order to analyze these points, this study draws on the discourse of Dongnip sinmun (The Independent).
참고문헌 (28)
- "Dongnip sinmun (The Independent)", ~
- "Gojong sillok 高宗實錄 (Annals of King Gojong)", ~
- Yun, Chi-ho, "Yun Chi-ho’s Diary" (1974), Tamgudang
- Buckle, Henry Thomas, "History of Civilization in England" (1857), Longman Green
- Chang, In-sung, "International Political Thought of Location" (2002), Seoul National University
- Chu, Chin-Oh, "The Social Thought of the Independence Club and Social Darwinism, In HistoryPapers in Honor of the Retirement of Dr. Son Bogi" (1988), Jisik Sanupsa
- Chun, Bok-hee, "Social Darwinism and the Idea of the State" (1996), Hanul
- Chung, Yong-Hwa, "The Trap of Civilization and Enlightenment Theory During Early Modern Korea: Focusing on Yun Chi-ho’s Diary", Korean Journal of International Relations, 41(4) (2001)
- de Ceuster, Koen, "From Modernization to Collaboration, the Dilemma of Korean Cultural Nationalism: The Case of Yun Ch’i-ho (1865-1945)", 박사, pp.1994
- de Condorcet, Antoine-Nicolas, "Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind" (1955), Weidenfeld and Nicolson
- Guizot, François, "The History of Civilization in Europe" (1997), Penguin Books
- Ha, Young Sun, "The History of the Introduction of the Concept of Civilization in ModernKorea, In The History of the Formation of the Social Sciences as a Conceptin Modern Korea" (2009), Changbi
- Hegel, George W. F., "The Philosophy of History. Translated by John Sibree" (1956), Dover Publications, Inc
- Jeong, Sang Woo, "Change in the Conception of Time after the Opening Up", Critical Review of History, 50 (2000)
- Jeong, Seong Hee, "The Administration of the Solar Calendar System and the Change of the Calendar Book in the Era of the Great Empire of Korea", Review of National History, 103 (2003)
- Jung, Keunsik, "The Formation of the Modern Time System and the Change of Everyday Life in Korea", Society and History, 58 (2000)
- Jung, Keunsik, "The System of Time and Colonial Modernity", Cultural Science, 41 (2005)
- Kant, Immanuel, "Idea for a Universal History from a Cosmopolitan Perspective, In Toward Perpetual Peace and Other Writings on Politics, Peace and History" (2006), Yale University Press
- Kim, Do Hyung, "A Study of the Political Ideas of Enlightenment Movement in the Last Years of Joseon Korea", Journal of Korea History, 54 (1986)
- Kim, Yonggu, "The Collision of Worldviews and the History of Diplomacy in LateJoseon, 1866-1882" (2001), Moonji
- Koselleck, Reinhart, "Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time" (2004), Columbia University Press
- Maruyama, Masao, "Translation and Japanese Modernity" (2000), Isan
- Meek, Ronald L., "Social Science and the Ignoble Savage" (1976), Cambridge University Press
- Park, Taeho, "Dongnip sinmun and Time Machinery", Society and History, 64 (2003)
- Rhee, Syngman, "The Spirit of National Independence" (1993), Jeongdong Chulpansa
- Schmid, Andre, "Korea between Empires, 1895-1919" (1919), Columbia University Press
- Shin, Yong-Ha, "A Study of the Independence Club" (1976), Ilchokak
- Yi, Tae-jin, "The True Story of the Unyo Incident, In Politics and Society in Joseon" (2002), Jipmoondang