전후 한일문학자의 전쟁소설 비교연구 -제3국에서 체험한 아시아태평양전쟁-
Comparative Study on War Novels of Korean and Japanese Post-War Writers
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
本研究の目的は、アジア太平洋戦争中、米国と日本の最大の激戦地であったフィリピンを背景にした戦後韓国と日本の戦争小説を比較分析することによって、第3国で体験したアジア太平洋戦争の意味を再照明することである。具体的な硏究対象は、1940年代初、フィリピンでの戦争に参加した共通の体験を持っている大岡昇平と李丙求が1945~1960年に発表した戦争小説である。大岡昇平と李丙求において共通の戦争経験地で作品の背景になっているのは、祖国ではなく、第3国のフィリピンである。この点から、両作家のアジア太平洋戦争を比較分析するにあたって、戦争の直接的な主体ではないけれども、最も熾烈な戦場になった「フィリピン」という空間的な背景が持つ意味を見逃すことはできない。それで、本研究では、第3国で体験したアジア太平洋戦争であるという点に注目して、戦後韓日文学者の戦争小説を比較研究した。作品の中で、敗兵となった主人公によって南方の風景とそこの原住民たちがどのように描かれているかを考察してみた。大岡の場合自然描写に、李丙求は人物描写に、主人公の心理的な状況が投影される傾向がある。そのような心理的投影を通じて、主人公は、集団から脱して個人としての自分自身を自覚する。これは、戦争の主導者あるいは加担者である自国の矛盾および作品発表当時の現実-米占領期の日本と理念対立期の韓国-に対する認識に繋がっている。
Abstract
This paper aims to conduct a comparative analysis of the war novels of Koreaand Japan written in the post-war years and set in the Philippines, the battlegroundof the most violent battles fought between the United States and Japan, and therebyshed new light on the meaning of the Asia Pacific War as experienced in a thirdcountry. More specifically, it explores the war novels published during 1945-1960by Ooka Shohei and Byung-gu Lee, authors who have had the common experienceof fighting in the war in the Philippines in the early 1940's. The setting of the novels of these two authors, which is also the place wherethey both actually experienced war in their lives, is not their native state but rathera third country, the Philippines. This is why in comparatively analyzing the AsiaPacific war novels of these authors, the implications associated with this spatialsetting cannot be overlooked, with the Philippines having been the fiercest battlefieldwhile it was never ever directly involved in the war. Therefore, this study focuseson the fact that the novels address the Asia Pacific war as experienced in a thirdcountry in comparing the post-war works of a Korean writer and a Japanese writer. this study looked into how the natural environment and native population of thePhilippines were depicted by the main characters of the novels who were survivingbut defeated soldiers. The psychological state of the protagonists tended to beprojected in the description of nature in Ooka's novel and in the characterizationof people in Lee's novel. Through such psychological projections, the protagonistsdetach themselves from the collective identity and perceive themselves as anindividual.
참고문헌 (14)
- 大岡昇平, "大岡昇平全集 別1巻" (1994), 筑摩書房
- 中井正義, "大岡昇平ノ―ト" (1989), 沖積舎
- 中野聰, "東南アジア占領と日本人" (2012), 岩波書店
- 日本アジア․アフリカ作家會議, "戦後文学とアジア" (1978), 每日新聞社
- 有精堂編輯部, "講座昭和文学史 第五巻 解体と変容" (1989), 有精堂
- 이병구, "해태이전", 자유문학, (21) (1958), 한국자유문학자협회
- 이병구, "기로에 나선 의미", 자유문학, (37) (1960), 한국자유문학자협회
- 이병구, "현대한국문학전집 제15권" (1968), 신구문화사
- 고영자, "한일 전후문학의 비교고찰", 비교문학, 11, pp.189~226 (1986), 한국비교문학회
- 권명아, "역사적 파시즘" (2005), 책세상
- 안미영, "태평양전쟁직후 한일(韓日) 소설에서 ‘전쟁’을 기억하는 방식 비교 연구 - 박노갑의 「歡」과 우메자키 하루오의 「櫻島」를 대상으로 -", 한국언어문학, 72(72), pp.347~376 (2010), 한국언어문학회
- 오태영, "‘남양(南洋)’ 표상과 지정학적 상상력", 한국문학이론과 비평, 13(2), pp.631~658 (2009), 한국문학이론과비평학회
- 이경재, "한국 소설에 나타난 태평양 전쟁기 일본군 체험", 한국현대문학연구, (14), pp.21~51 (2003), 한국현대문학회
- 이내수, "비평집 제1권-한국소설의 문제작", pp.95~107 (1985), 일념
