본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

방어적 민주주의 담론의 형성과 미국 외교, 1914-1946

Shaping of Defensive Discourse of Democracy and American Diplomacy, 1914-1946

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

This article explores how democracy arose as an American policy agenda in the interwar era and the Second World War. Although democracy emerged as a meaningful agenda during the interwar era, I discovered that Americans’ stance toward democracy was in general defensive: they were mostly preoccupied with protecting democracy at home (or where it existed in Europe) rather than actively promoting it in the rest of the world. Having entered the war and fought against fascist forces, Americans became more confident in the security of their democracy at home and designed an ambitious plan to create a single world order based on capitalism and democracy. However, since the U.S. plan to promote democracy in the immediate postwar era still privileged national security concerns, it was applied only in former enemy countries. American policymakers, who not only focused on the relationship among the Great Powers, but also distrusted the ability of the former colonial peoples to govern themselves, embraced a general principle of trusteeship as a solution to appease both the colonized people’s nationalist fervor and the colonizer’s fierce determination to maintain its overseas possessions. I argue that the America’s defensive position in democracy promotion explains how the Korean people were able to play significant roles in shaping democratic ideas and institutions, despite the strong U.S. presence. The trusteeship plan, which had underestimated the Korean desire for national independence and capacity for nation-building, was therefore soon to be abandoned and the U.S. military government now began to consider promoting democracy in the southern half of Korea. U.S. military leaders and South Korean conservatives, who shared the leftist enemies, together turned South Korean democracy to the right side.

Abstract

This article explores how democracy arose as an American policy agenda in the interwar era and the Second World War. Although democracy emerged as a meaningful agenda during the interwar era, I discovered that Americans’ stance toward democracy was in general defensive: they were mostly preoccupied with protecting democracy at home (or where it existed in Europe) rather than actively promoting it in the rest of the world. Having entered the war and fought against fascist forces, Americans became more confident in the security of their democracy at home and designed an ambitious plan to create a single world order based on capitalism and democracy. However, since the U.S. plan to promote democracy in the immediate postwar era still privileged national security concerns, it was applied only in former enemy countries. American policymakers, who not only focused on the relationship among the Great Powers, but also distrusted the ability of the former colonial peoples to govern themselves, embraced a general principle of trusteeship as a solution to appease both the colonized people’s nationalist fervor and the colonizer’s fierce determination to maintain its overseas possessions. I argue that the America’s defensive position in democracy promotion explains how the Korean people were able to play significant roles in shaping democratic ideas and institutions, despite the strong U.S. presence. The trusteeship plan, which had underestimated the Korean desire for national independence and capacity for nation-building, was therefore soon to be abandoned and the U.S. military government now began to consider promoting democracy in the southern half of Korea. U.S. military leaders and South Korean conservatives, who shared the leftist enemies, together turned South Korean democracy to the right side.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. Council on Foreign Relations, "The War and Peace Studies of the Council on Foreign Relations, 1939-1945" (1946), The Harold Pratt House
  2. "FRUS (1946) VIII", ~ (1946)
  3. Jackson Papers, "Box 41, Citizen for Victory", Dwight D. Eisenhower Library
  4. Jackson Papers, "Box 42, Board Meeting", Dwight D. Eisenhower Library
  5. Jackson Papers, "Box 42, Ernest Angell (2)", Dwight D. Eisenhower Library
  6. Jackson Papers, "Box 43, Defense on Main Street", Dwight D. Eisenhower Library
  7. Jackson Papers, "Box 44, Council for Democracy Pamphlets - Misc", Dwight D. Eisenhower Library
  8. Jackson Papers, "Box 44, Future Plans", Dwight D. Eisenhower Library
  9. Notter, Harley A, "Office of Public Affairs, Postwar foreign policy preparation, 1939-1945" (1949), U.S. G.P.O
  10. Office of Public Communication, "Bureau of Public Affairs", The Department of State Bulletin, IX (1944), United States Government Printing Office
  11. "Records of the Advisory Committee on Post-War Foreign Policy, Box 5, 54", RG 59 Records of Harley A. Notter, ~ (1945)
  12. "Summation (Korea), no 13 (October, 1946),” RG 331 SCAP Supreme Commanders for the Allied Powers, Civil Intelligence Section, Civil Censorship Detachment, Press, Publication and Broadcast Div. (1945-49), Box 12", National Archives II, College Park, MD, ~ (1946)
  13. 박찬승, "대한민국은 민주공화국이다" (2013), 돌베개
  14. Cole, Wayne S, "America First: The Battle Against Intervention, 1940-41" (1953), Madison, Univ. of Wisconsin Press
  15. Cumings, Bruce, "Korea’s place in the sun: a modern history" (1997), W.W. Norton
  16. Eichelberger, Clark M, "Organizing for Peace: A Personal History of the Founding of the United Nations" (1977), Harper & Row
  17. Johnson, Walter, "Battle Against Isolation" (1973), Da Capo Press
  18. Johnstone, Andrew, "Dilemmas of Internationalism" (2008), Farnham, Ashgate
  19. Kim, Seung-young, "American Diplomacy and Strategy toward Korea and Northeast Asia, 1882 - 1950 and After: Perception of Polarity and US Commitment to a Periphery" (2009), Palgrave Macmillan
  20. Lee, Jongsoo, "The Partition of Korea after World War II: A Global History" (2006), Palgrave Macmillan
  21. Lindbergh, Charles A., "Autobiography of Values", Mariner Books (1992)
  22. Manela, Erez, "The Wilsonian Moment: Self-Determination and the International Origins of Anticolonial Nationalism" (2007), Oxford University Press
  23. McCoy, Drew R., "The Elusive Republic: Political Economy in Jeffersonian America" (1996), Univ. of North Carolina Press
  24. Ninkovich, Frank A, "The Diplomacy of Ideas: U.S. Foreign Policy and Cultural Relations, 1938-1950" (1995), Imprint Publications
  25. Ninkovich, Frank A, "The Wilsonian Century: U.S. Foreign Policy since 1900" (2001), Univ. of Chicago Press
  26. Rosenberg, Emily, "Spreading the American Dream: American Economic & Cultural Expansion 1890-1945" (1982), Hill and Wang
  27. Shoup, Laurence H, "Imperial Brain Trust: The Council on Foreign Relations and United States Foreign Policy" (1977), Monthly Review Press
  28. Smith, Tony, "America’s Mission: The United States and the Worldwide Struggle for Democracy in the Twentieth Century" (1995), A Twentieth Century Fund Book
  29. Wala, Michael, "The Council on Foreign Relations and American Foreign Policy in the Early Cold War" (1994), Providence, Berghahn Books
  30. Seymour, Charles, "Defense for America" (1940), Macmillan
  31. Turner, Frederick Jackson, "The Significance of the Frontier in American History", Proceedings of the State Historical Society of Wisconsin (1893)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)