본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

관용적 이항구조의 어순제약 - 특히 독어와 영어의 음성 및 음운론적 층위를 중심으로

Word Order Constraints on German and English Binomial Idioms. - Focusing on the Phonetico-Phonological Levels of German and English

장기성
언어과학회 (The Linguistic Science Society)|2010.12|언어과학연구 (The Journal of Linguistics Science)|제55호|pp. 247-274

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

어순(word order)관용적 이항구조(binomial idioms)전항(first element)후항(second element)음절(syllables)
주제분류언어학

초록

This study aims to analyze word order constraints for German binomial idioms with a focus on phonetico-phonological constraints according to the principle of Cooper/Ross. Using the results, the investigator was able to set the degree among the overall principles that rule word orders for German binomial idioms. In addition, a comparison between German and English in terms of constraints shed light onto commonalities and differences in quantitative and qualitative constraints between the two languages. The cross-linguistics results between them also showed an overall similar distribution in constraints, which primarily proves that the principle of Cooper/Ross has universality. In short, the percentage degrees of the individual principles in German according to the principle of Cooper/ Ross were as follows: 1)A phonetico-phonological analysis is focused on the degree of constraints and hierarchies exercised upon the word order of binomial idioms by such principles as, P, C¹, V, F, C², C³, Cp. In β≧ɑ, P(94.7%), C¹(86.8), V(73.7%), F(65.8%), C²(71.4%), C³ (72.9%), Cp(86.8%). In β>ɑ, P(37.6%), C¹(18.4), V(45.5%), F(36.8%), C²(36.8%), C³(39.1%), Cp(27.8%). The word order constraints of German and English were close to each other within 10% across all the principles except for Cp in case of β≧ɑ and V in case of β>ɑ, which proves that the two languages share a very similar mechanism of word order constraints. Those results indicate that phonetico-phonological principle of Cooper/ Ross has significance as a principle and can be regarded as a linguistically universal principle.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze word order constraints for German binomial idioms with a focus on phonetico-phonological constraints according to the principle of Cooper/Ross. Using the results, the investigator was able to set the degree among the overall principles that rule word orders for German binomial idioms. In addition, a comparison between German and English in terms of constraints shed light onto commonalities and differences in quantitative and qualitative constraints between the two languages. The cross-linguistics results between them also showed an overall similar distribution in constraints, which primarily proves that the principle of Cooper/Ross has universality. In short, the percentage degrees of the individual principles in German according to the principle of Cooper/ Ross were as follows: 1)A phonetico-phonological analysis is focused on the degree of constraints and hierarchies exercised upon the word order of binomial idioms by such principles as, P, C¹, V, F, C², C³, Cp. In β≧ɑ, P(94.7%), C¹(86.8), V(73.7%), F(65.8%), C²(71.4%), C³ (72.9%), Cp(86.8%). In β>ɑ, P(37.6%), C¹(18.4), V(45.5%), F(36.8%), C²(36.8%), C³(39.1%), Cp(27.8%). The word order constraints of German and English were close to each other within 10% across all the principles except for Cp in case of β≧ɑ and V in case of β>ɑ, which proves that the two languages share a very similar mechanism of word order constraints. Those results indicate that phonetico-phonological principle of Cooper/ Ross has significance as a principle and can be regarded as a linguistically universal principle.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. Drosdowski, G, "Duden-Redewendungen und Sprichwörterliche Redensarten" (1992), Duden Verlag
  2. Schemann, H, "English-German Dictionary of Idioms" (1997), Routledge
  3. Strutz, H, "German and English Idioms" (1995), Barron's
  4. 윤희수, "영어 관용어에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1988
  5. 장기성, "성구적 이항구조의 어순 제약", 언어과학연구, 25, pp.235~256 (2003), 언어과학회
  6. 장기성, "관용적 이항구조의 어순 제약 - 특히 음성 및 음운론적 층위를 중심으로 -", 언어과학연구, (50), pp.169~206 (2009), 언어과학회
  7. 장기성, "영어의 관용적 이항구조 어순제약", 박사, pp.2010
  8. Abraham, R. D, "Fixed Order of Coordinates", Modern Language Journal, 34, pp.276~287 (1950)
  9. Bolinger, D.L, "Binomials and Pitch Accent", Lingua, 11, pp.34~44 (1962)
  10. Borrow, S. A, "On Catching on to Idiomatic Expressions", Memory & Cognition, 1(3), pp.343~346
  11. Burger, H, "Phraseologie. Eine Einführung am Beispiel des Deutschen" (1998), ESV
  12. Cacciari, C, "The Comprehension of Idioms", Journal of Memory and Language, 27, pp.668~683 (1988)
  13. Cacciari, C, "Idiom: Processing, Structure and Interpretation" (1993), Lawrence Erlbaum Association
  14. "Cooper, W. E. & J. R. Ross. 1975. Word Order, Papers from the Parasession on Functionalism, In Grossman, R. E., L. J, San, T. J. Vanc (ed), 63-111", ~ (1975)
  15. Cronk, B. C, "The Comprehension of Idioms: The Effects of Familiarity, Literalness, and Usage", Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, pp.136~146 (1992)
  16. Fleischer, W, "Phraseologie der Deutschen Gegenwartssprache" (1982), VER
  17. Gustafsson, M, "The Frequency and “Frozenness” of Some English Binomials", Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 77, pp.623~637 (1976)
  18. Makkai, A, "Idiom Structure in English" (1972), Mouton
  19. Malkiel, Y, "Studies in Irreversible Binomials", Lingua, 8, pp.113~160 (1959)
  20. Martinet, J, "Deutsche Grammatik" (1826), Kohlhammer
  21. McCarthy, J.J, "A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory" (2002), Cambrige University Press
  22. McDonald, J. L, "Word and World Order: Semantic, Phonological, and Metrical Determinants of Serial Position", Cognitive Psychology, 25, pp.188~230 (1993)
  23. Moon, R, "Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English" (1998), Clarendon Press
  24. Müller, G, "Beschränkungen für Binomialbildung im Deutschen", Zeit für Sprachwissenschaft, 16, pp.5~51 (1997)
  25. Pesot, J, "Ikonismus in der Phraseologie", Semiotik, 2, pp.7~18 (1980)
  26. Pink, S, "Speaker' Sensitivity to Rules of Frozen Word Order", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, pp.497~508 (1979)
  27. Ross, J. R, "Ikonismus in der Phraseologie", Semiotik, 2, pp.39~56 (1980)
  28. Scholes, R. J, "On the Spoken Disambiguation of Superficially Ambiguous Sentense", Language and Speech, 14(1), pp.266~276 (1971)
  29. Swinney, D. A, "The Access and Processing of Idiomatic Expressions", Journal of Verbal Leaning and Behavior, 18, pp.523~534 (1979)
  30. Tabossi, P, "Idiom Syntax:Idiosycratic or Principled?", Journal of Memory and Language, 61, pp.77~96 (2009)
  31. Titone, D. T, "On the Compositional and Noncompositional Nature of Idiomatic Expressions", Journal of Pragmatics, 31, pp.1655~1674 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

관용적 이항구조의 어순 제약 - 특히 음성 및 음운론적 층위를 중심으로 -장기성언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2009 · 제50호관용적 이항구조의 어순제약 - 심리적 층위를 중심으로 -장기성언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2013 · 제66호관용적 이항구조의 어순제약 - 특히 빈도수를 중심으로 -장기성언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2010 · 제52호영어음운론의 정보를 활용한 통사 구조의 기술: 이항구조 어순에 대한 학습자 지식을 토대로김종훈한국영어영문학회 · 영어영문학2018 · 제23권 제1호독어에서 테마․레마와 관용적 이항구조의 어순제약장기성언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2012 · 제63호독일어 쌍둥이 관용구 ‘부사 und 부사’의 어휘 배열 원칙 - 의미적 기준, 빈도 및 문화 특수적 요인을 중심으로황순하한국독어학회 · 독어학2024 · 제49호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)

한국어 학습자의 문법 지식 의미 재고김호정pp. 1-28Discussion Task as a Method of Oral Proficiency Test: Responding to the Others류혜경pp. 29-50ESL 환경에서 영어일기쓰기에 나타난 오류분석박선옥pp. 51-68Many Ways of English Preposition To: From a Grammaticalization Perspective백정혜pp. 69-94How can Face and Hierarchy Affect Interactions between Western Teachers and Asian Students?백주현pp. 95-116
원문 보기