독어에서 테마․레마와 관용적 이항구조의 어순제약
A Study on Theme and Rheme and Their Constraint on the Word Order of Binomial Idioms in German.
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to investigate how much constraint, if any, theme and rheme would have on the word order of binomial idioms based on the premise that the concepts of theme and rheme could be dichotomized from the perspective of sentence functions. The old views of sentences had been delivered by the formal division between the subject and predicate. Daneŝ, however, introduced theme and rheme from the perspective of value delivery by sentences instead of the subject and predicate; Firbas dichotomized sentences into theme and rheme based on communicative dynamic; and Halliday divided information into new and old information according to volume. As a dichotomy according to perspectives from which to see through sentences, such a division focused on rather different perspectives from the traditional grammar. For instance, antecedents(former) have less value to deliver, lower communicative dynamic, and smaller volume of information to deliver than consequents according to the segmentation (division) of delivery value by Daneŝ, communicative dynamic by Firbas, and the principle of information volume by Halliday. On the contrary, consequents(latter) have more value to deliver, higher communicative dynamic, and bigger volume of information to deliver. When the frequency principle of Zipf is applied, antecedents have a higher frequency, while consequents have a relatively lower frequency. This study examined whether theme and rheme would have explanatory power and constraint over the word order of binomial idioms with a quantitative(statistical) method by using the frequency device of Zipf. As a result, the hit rate was the highest in the order of (7) > (8) > (11) > (10) > (12) > (13) > (9) > (14). In general, the word order hit rate of binomial idioms in German was 72.5%, which indicates that it is as restrictive as cognitive and phonological constraint and should be treated as significant findings in terms of linguistic statistical processing.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate how much constraint, if any, theme and rheme would have on the word order of binomial idioms based on the premise that the concepts of theme and rheme could be dichotomized from the perspective of sentence functions. The old views of sentences had been delivered by the formal division between the subject and predicate. Daneŝ, however, introduced theme and rheme from the perspective of value delivery by sentences instead of the subject and predicate; Firbas dichotomized sentences into theme and rheme based on communicative dynamic; and Halliday divided information into new and old information according to volume. As a dichotomy according to perspectives from which to see through sentences, such a division focused on rather different perspectives from the traditional grammar. For instance, antecedents(former) have less value to deliver, lower communicative dynamic, and smaller volume of information to deliver than consequents according to the segmentation (division) of delivery value by Daneŝ, communicative dynamic by Firbas, and the principle of information volume by Halliday. On the contrary, consequents(latter) have more value to deliver, higher communicative dynamic, and bigger volume of information to deliver. When the frequency principle of Zipf is applied, antecedents have a higher frequency, while consequents have a relatively lower frequency. This study examined whether theme and rheme would have explanatory power and constraint over the word order of binomial idioms with a quantitative(statistical) method by using the frequency device of Zipf. As a result, the hit rate was the highest in the order of (7) > (8) > (11) > (10) > (12) > (13) > (9) > (14). In general, the word order hit rate of binomial idioms in German was 72.5%, which indicates that it is as restrictive as cognitive and phonological constraint and should be treated as significant findings in terms of linguistic statistical processing.
참고문헌 (35)
- Schemann, H, "English-German Dictionary of Idiom" (1997), Routledge
- Strutz, H, "German and English Idioms" (1995), Barron's
- Scholze-Stubenrecht, W, "Redewendungen und Sprichwörtliche Redensarten(Duden 11)" (1992), Dudenverlag
- 장기성, "모사성에 관한 연구", 독일어문학, 4, pp.857~876 (1996)
- 장기성, "관용적 이항구조의 어순 제약 - 특히 음성 및 음운론적 층위를 중심으로 -", 언어과학연구, (50), pp.169~206 (2009), 언어과학회
- 장기성, "관용적 이항구조의 어순제약 - 특히 빈도수를 중심으로 -", 언어과학연구, (52), pp.197~242 (2010), 언어과학회
- 장기성, "독어의 관용적 이항구조 어순제약 -특히 빈도수를 중심으로-", 독어교육, 50(50), pp.131~155 (2011), 한국독어독문학교육학회
- Functional Sentence Perspective: Horizontal vs. Vertical, "Adam, M", 3~15, pp.Vienna English Working Papers 15 (2006)
- Beneŝ, E, "Thema-Rhema-Gliederung und Textlinguistik, Sprache der Gegenwart 30. Studien zur Texttheorie und zur Deutschen Grammatik" (1973), Idium
- Boucher, J, "The Pollyanna Hypothesis", Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior, 8, pp.1~8 (1969)
- Bühler, K, "Sprachtheorie, die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache" (1934), Fischer
- Chomsky, N, "Aspects of Theory of Syntax" (1965), MIT Press
- Cooper, W. E, "Word Order, In Papers from the Parasession on Functionalism", pp.63~111 (1975)
- Dahl, T, "Form and Function" (1936), Ritzels
- Danes, P. B, "The Speech Chain" (1963), Bell Telephone Laboratories
- Danes, F, "Sentence Intonation from a Functional Point of View", Word, 16, pp.34~54 (1978)
- Dressler, W. U, "Morphology: the Dynamics of Derivation" (1985), Karoma Publishers
- Firbas, J, "On Defining the Theme in Functional Sentence Analysis", Travaux Linguistiques de Prague, 1, pp.267~280 (1964)
- Fry, E, "Increasing Fluency with High Frequency Word Phrases" (2009), Shell Education
- Gross, H, "Einführung in die Germanistische Linguistik" (1998), idium verlag
- Gustafsson, M, "The Frequency and “Frozenness” of Some English Binomials", Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 77, pp.623~637 (1976)
- Halliday, M. A. K, "Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English", Journal of Linguistics, 4, pp.189~ (1967)
- Halliday, M. A. K, "Language Structure and Language Function" (1970), Penguin
- Lutz, L, "Einführung in die Thema-Rhema-Theorie" (1981), Buchagentur
- Malkiel, Y, "Studies in Irreversible Binomials", Lingua, 8, pp.113~160 (1959)
- Mathesius, A, "A Functional Analysis of Present Day English on a General Linguistic Basis" (1975), Mouton
- Mayerthaler, W, "Morphologische Natürlichkeit" (1981), Athenaion
- Meisel, J, "Deutsch als Zweitsprache" (1983), Gunter Narr
- Moon, R, "Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English" (1998), Clarendon Press
- Müller, G, "Beschränkungen für Binomialbildung im Deutschen", Zeit für Sprachwissenschaft, 16, pp.5~51 (1997)
- Schippan, T, "Lexikologie der Deutschen Gegenwartssprache" (1984), VER
- Weigand, E, "Zum Zusammenhang von Thema", Rhema und Subjekt, ZGL, pp.1979, 72[DOI]
- Zipf, G. K, "Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort, an Introduction to Human Ecology" (1949), Addison Wesley Press
- Zipf, G. K, "Tool Analogy and Word Order", Glottomotvics, pp.22~28 (2002)