본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어 ‘-다는’ 관형절 교육 연구 - 중국인 학습자를 중심으로 -

A Study on Korean Adnominal Clause ‘-다는’ Education - Focused on Chinese Learners -

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

The aim of this study is to examine the syntax and semantics of the adnominal clause ‘-다는’ and to propose effective teaching and learning methods so as to ensure accurate use of the clause by Chinese learners. To this end, the adnominal clause ‘-다는’ was classified into relative clause, appositive clause, and connected clause to examine their respective syntactic and semantic features. It was found that ‘-다는’ in a relative clause can be reverted to ‘-다고 하는’ and that there is no substantial syntactic and semantic difference between ‘-다는’ and ‘-다고 하는’. The ‘-다는’ in a appositive clause can be subdivided into three constructions: the first case in which the reversion of ‘-다는’ to ‘-다고 하는’ is natural, the second case in which such reversion leads to diminished receptivity, and the third case in which the reversion cannot take place. Differences between long and short adnominal clauses were found in modificand nouns, exchange of tense endings and interposition of the prefinal ending ‘-시-’. On the other hand, it was found that the ‘-다는’ in a connected clause can be sorted into those that can and cannot be replaced with the adnominal clausal ending ‘-는’, and that there is a difference in meaning even if it is replaced with ‘-는’. Based on these findings, Chinese sentences corresponding to each type of Korean adnominal clause ‘-다는’ were compared and analyzed. As a result, it was found that the signs of Chinese modifying clauses corresponding to Korean ‘-다는’ are all ‘的’. Through these analysis results, it was possible to determine the reasons to the problems found in the writing of Chinese learners, such as avoiding the use of ‘-다는’ , using ‘-다는’ mixed with ‘-는’, suing ‘-다는’ mixed with ‘-(이)라는’, and tense error in ‘-다는’. Accordingly, this study proposed effective teaching and learning plans containing step-by-step educational contents of ‘-다는’ for Chinese intermediate and advanced learners.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the syntax and semantics of the adnominal clause ‘-다는’ and to propose effective teaching and learning methods so as to ensure accurate use of the clause by Chinese learners. To this end, the adnominal clause ‘-다는’ was classified into relative clause, appositive clause, and connected clause to examine their respective syntactic and semantic features. It was found that ‘-다는’ in a relative clause can be reverted to ‘-다고 하는’ and that there is no substantial syntactic and semantic difference between ‘-다는’ and ‘-다고 하는’. The ‘-다는’ in a appositive clause can be subdivided into three constructions: the first case in which the reversion of ‘-다는’ to ‘-다고 하는’ is natural, the second case in which such reversion leads to diminished receptivity, and the third case in which the reversion cannot take place. Differences between long and short adnominal clauses were found in modificand nouns, exchange of tense endings and interposition of the prefinal ending ‘-시-’. On the other hand, it was found that the ‘-다는’ in a connected clause can be sorted into those that can and cannot be replaced with the adnominal clausal ending ‘-는’, and that there is a difference in meaning even if it is replaced with ‘-는’. Based on these findings, Chinese sentences corresponding to each type of Korean adnominal clause ‘-다는’ were compared and analyzed. As a result, it was found that the signs of Chinese modifying clauses corresponding to Korean ‘-다는’ are all ‘的’. Through these analysis results, it was possible to determine the reasons to the problems found in the writing of Chinese learners, such as avoiding the use of ‘-다는’ , using ‘-다는’ mixed with ‘-는’, suing ‘-다는’ mixed with ‘-(이)라는’, and tense error in ‘-다는’. Accordingly, this study proposed effective teaching and learning plans containing step-by-step educational contents of ‘-다는’ for Chinese intermediate and advanced learners.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 강범모, "한국어 보문명사 구문의 의미 특성", 어학연구, 19(1), pp.53~ (1983), 서울대 어학연구소
  2. 고영근, "우리말 문법론", pp.307~309 (2009), 집문당
  3. 김선효, "인용 구문 '-다고 하는'과 '-다는'의 특성", 어학연구, 40(1), pp.161~176 (2004), 언어교육원
  4. 김아영, "중국어와 한국어의 관형절 대조연구―기사와 사설에서의 사용 제약을 중심으로-", 중국문학, 64, pp.343~370 (2010), 한국중국어문학회[DOI]
  5. 김지은, "관형절 유형에 대한 연구", 애산학보, 27, pp.157~185 (2002), 애산학회
  6. 남기심, "国语 完形补文法 研究", pp.1~37 (1973), 계명대학교 출판부
  7. 남신혜, "{-다는}의 유형과 문법화", 언어사실과 관점, 32, pp.289~314 (2013), 언어정보연구원[DOI]
  8. 박형진, "完形補文의 統辭와 意味에 대한 考察", 어문연구(語文硏究), 46(4), pp.63~89 (2018), 한국어문교육연구회[DOI]
  9. 서희정, "한국어 학습자의 문장 구조 다양화를 위한 관형절 내포문 사용 양상 연구", 이중언어학, (72), pp.87~121 (2018), 이중언어학회[DOI]
  10. 엄녀, "한국어교육을 위한 양태 표현 교육 연구", 박사, 한국어교육, pp.2009
  11. 우효로, "중국인 한국어학습자의 내포문 사용실태 및 교육방안 연구 : 중급 학습자를 대상으로", 석사, 국어국문학과 한국어교육학전공, pp.2014
  12. 유경옥, "韓國語 冠形節 內包文 敎育 硏究 - 中國人 學習者를 중심으로 -", 어문연구(語文硏究), 46(4), pp.453~492 (2018), 한국어문교육연구회[DOI]
  13. 이관규, "관형사 어미 ‘다는’에 대한 고찰", 새국어교육, (77), pp.489~504 (2007), 한국국어교육학회[DOI]
  14. 이영, "한국어 교육을 위한 한·중 양태 표현의 대조 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2011
  15. 이익섭, "국어문법론", pp.84~85 (1983), 학연사
  16. 이준호, "한국어 명사구 보문절의 교육 연구 - 교재 분석 및 학습자 오류 분석을 중심으로 -", 한국어교육, 24(3), pp.211~237 (2013), 국제한국어교육학회[DOI]
  17. 장경희, "국어의 완형보문의 해석", 국어학, 16, pp.487~519 (1987), 국어학회
  18. 한송화, "‘-다는’인용과 인용명사의 사용 양상과 기능 -신문 텍스트에 나타난 인용을 중심으로-", 외국어로서의 한국어교육, 39, pp.447~472 (2013), 언어연구교육원 한국어학당
  19. 한송화, "한국어 학습자의 관형절과 관형사형 어미 사용 양상 연구 - 관계관형절과 동격관형절을 중심으로 -", 문법 교육, 24, pp.211~243 (2015), 한국문법교육학회
  20. 허메이핑, "한국어 관형절 내포문과 중국어 수식절 내포문의 대조 연구", 한글, 79(2), pp.369~397 (2018), 한글학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)