한국어 관형사형 어미 대치 오류 분석 -중국어권 학습자를 중심으로-
An Analysis of the Substitution Errors in Korean Adnominal Ending Forms -Focused on Chinese Learners-
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to clarify the cause of errors analyzing the Korean corpus of Chinese learners to represent the aspect of the errors both in the formations with the substitution errors in adnominal endings and in the structural patterns with adnominal clauses. As a result of analyzing substitution errors of adnominal ending forms according to the formation, this study shows that the learners have difficulty using '-(았/었)던' while they are familiar with using adnominal ending 'A-(으)ㄴ'. The most frequently substituted adnominal ending forms are 'V-(으)ㄴ' and '-는'. As a result of analyzing substitution errors according to the structural patterns, the learners are familiar with using adnominal ending forms in relative clauses and relative phrases, however, they have trouble in using adnominal ending forms in appositive clauses. There are three reasons Chinese learners have a problem with using adnominal ending forms: First, they lack understanding Korean grammatical characteristics of adnominal ending forms which are complicated in meaning and usage according to the forms related to the Korean grammatical categories of tense, aspect and mood are closely linked to one another, while there is only one relative marker '的' in Chinese without grammatical characteristics. Second, they are short of understanding relative tense which shows a difference in the tense of the main clause and the tense of the subordinate clause. Also, they lack understanding the grammatical restrictions on attaching adnominal ending forms to the nouns or bound nouns.
Abstract
This study aims to clarify the cause of errors analyzing the Korean corpus of Chinese learners to represent the aspect of the errors both in the formations with the substitution errors in adnominal endings and in the structural patterns with adnominal clauses. As a result of analyzing substitution errors of adnominal ending forms according to the formation, this study shows that the learners have difficulty using '-(았/었)던' while they are familiar with using adnominal ending 'A-(으)ㄴ'. The most frequently substituted adnominal ending forms are 'V-(으)ㄴ' and '-는'. As a result of analyzing substitution errors according to the structural patterns, the learners are familiar with using adnominal ending forms in relative clauses and relative phrases, however, they have trouble in using adnominal ending forms in appositive clauses. There are three reasons Chinese learners have a problem with using adnominal ending forms: First, they lack understanding Korean grammatical characteristics of adnominal ending forms which are complicated in meaning and usage according to the forms related to the Korean grammatical categories of tense, aspect and mood are closely linked to one another, while there is only one relative marker '的' in Chinese without grammatical characteristics. Second, they are short of understanding relative tense which shows a difference in the tense of the main clause and the tense of the subordinate clause. Also, they lack understanding the grammatical restrictions on attaching adnominal ending forms to the nouns or bound nouns.
참고문헌 (17)
- 고석주, "한국어 학습자 말뭉치와 오류 분석" (2004), 한국문화사
- 권재일, "국어의 복합문 구성 연구" (1985), 집문당
- 국립국어원, "외국인을 위한 한국어 문법1·2" (2005), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 김성수, "유형적 보편성을 통해 본 한국어 학습자의 관계절 사용 양상 연구", 박사, pp.2010
- 김유정, "한국어 학습자 말뭉치 오류분석의 기준 연구", 한국어 교육, 16(1), pp.45~76 (2005), 국제한국어교육학회
- 남기심, "표준 국어문법론(개정판)" (2009), 탑출판사
- 남기심, "(외국인을 위한) 한국어 교육의 방법과 실제" (1999), 한국방송통신대학교출판사
- 서정수, "국어 문법" (1994), 뿌리깊은나무
- 이상숙, "한국어 학습자를 위한 관형사형 어미 교육 방안", 한국언어문학, (72), pp.43~66 (2010), 한국언어문학회
- 이익섭, "국어문법론" (1996), 학연사
- 이진경, "한국어 학습자의 관형사형 어미 사용 연구", 석사, pp.2006
- 임호빈, "(외국인을 위한) 한국어 문법" (1987), 연세대학교
- 최현배, "우리말본" (1937), 정음사
- 한송화, "한국어 학습자의 오류 분석 -전성 어미에서의 오류-", 외국어로서의 한국어교육, 27, pp.571~608 (2002), 연세대학교 언어연구교육원 한국어학당
- 한재영, "한국어 문법 교육" (2008), 태학사
- 허 용, "(한국어 교육을 위한) 한국어 문법론" (2003), 한국 문화사
- 허 웅, "통어론" (1999), 샘문화사
