영-한 번역과 시점 -재귀대명사와 부정의문문의 용법을 중심으로
English-Korean Translation and Point of View -Reflexive Pronouns and Negative-interrogative Sentences-
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper has entered into the wider purpose to ascertain the viewpoint or empathy as the basic factor underlying the differences between English and Korean, and furthermore to find out the proper way to satisfy requirements in the translation from English into Korean. We have surveyed and compared the general usages of reflexive pronouns in English and Korean. The important difference revealed is as follows: While it shows the co-referentiality of the subject and object in English, it gives the viewpoint of the speaker and hearer into the animate beings referred to by that reflexive pronoun in Korean. Second, while it cannot go over the clause boundary in English, it can go over into even another sentence in Korean. Therefore, the translator may introduce reflexive pronouns, on condition the viewpoint of description should not be changed, even though the corresponding nouns are expressed as general pronouns, not reflexive pronouns. We have performed the same processes in analyzing the negative-interrogatives of the two, as applied to the reflexive pronoun category. The important difference revealed is that the answerer replies affirmatively or negatively according to the questioner's attitude towards the given message in Korean, while the answerer does according to truth or falsity of the given message in English. Therefore, the translator uses the strategy to express affirmatively, contrary to the English original mode or negatively contrary to the English.
Abstract
This paper has entered into the wider purpose to ascertain the viewpoint or empathy as the basic factor underlying the differences between English and Korean, and furthermore to find out the proper way to satisfy requirements in the translation from English into Korean. We have surveyed and compared the general usages of reflexive pronouns in English and Korean. The important difference revealed is as follows: While it shows the co-referentiality of the subject and object in English, it gives the viewpoint of the speaker and hearer into the animate beings referred to by that reflexive pronoun in Korean. Second, while it cannot go over the clause boundary in English, it can go over into even another sentence in Korean. Therefore, the translator may introduce reflexive pronouns, on condition the viewpoint of description should not be changed, even though the corresponding nouns are expressed as general pronouns, not reflexive pronouns. We have performed the same processes in analyzing the negative-interrogatives of the two, as applied to the reflexive pronoun category. The important difference revealed is that the answerer replies affirmatively or negatively according to the questioner's attitude towards the given message in Korean, while the answerer does according to truth or falsity of the given message in English. Therefore, the translator uses the strategy to express affirmatively, contrary to the English original mode or negatively contrary to the English.
참고문헌 (12)
- 강수언, "한국어와 영어의 비교연구" (1989), 한신문화사
- 김정아, "15세기 국어의 대명사에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.1984
- 김정우, "영-한 번역과 시점의 이동", 통번역교육연구, 7(1), pp.117~138 (2009), 한국통번역교육학회
- 서정수, "국어 문법(수정 3판)" (2006), 한세본
- 이익섭, "국어 문법론" (1983), 학연사
- 임홍빈, "바른 국어생활과 문법" (2001), 한국방송대학교 출판부
- 최규수, "시점과 문형의 관계", 우리말 연구, 3, pp.115~152 (1993)
- 최규수, "시점과 안은 겹월의 격 실현", 한글, 224, pp.109~145 (1994)
- 한동완, "국어의 시제 연구" (1996), 태학사
- Baker M, "Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies" (1998), Routledge: London & New York
- Kuno, S, "Empathy and Syntax", Linguistic Inquiry, 8(4), pp.627~672 (1977)
- Randolph Quirk, "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman Inc.: New York
