영한 번역에 나타난 지시표현의 변경에 관한 언어유형론 및 문화심리학적 연구
A Typological and Cultural- Psychological Approach to Korean Translations of English Referential Expressions
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study tries to provide typological and cultural-psychological explanations for the changes of referential expressions in English-Korean translations. The number of pronoun, name and full NP is strikingly different in the English text and Korean translation text: 190/5 pronouns, 88/156 names and 34/151 full NP's in the English/Korean texts. These statistical differences can be accounted for in the following way: i) a pronoun is used to refer to a continuous participant in English while a name is repeatedly employed in Korean; ii) a full NP showing roles (e.g. family relations such as father and son as well as occupations) in the social organism is preferred, regardless of the topicality of participants in Korean; and iii) a pronoun cannot be used to refer to animals in Korean so that a full NP is chosen instead
Abstract
This study tries to provide typological and cultural-psychological explanations for the changes of referential expressions in English-Korean translations. The number of pronoun, name and full NP is strikingly different in the English text and Korean translation text: 190/5 pronouns, 88/156 names and 34/151 full NP's in the English/Korean texts. These statistical differences can be accounted for in the following way: i) a pronoun is used to refer to a continuous participant in English while a name is repeatedly employed in Korean; ii) a full NP showing roles (e.g. family relations such as father and son as well as occupations) in the social organism is preferred, regardless of the topicality of participants in Korean; and iii) a pronoun cannot be used to refer to animals in Korean so that a full NP is chosen instead
참고문헌 (17)
- 곽성희, "영한번역에 나타난 결속구조 전환양상", 번역학연구, 3(1), pp.125~144 (2002), 한국번역학회
- 김은일, "영어구사력 향상을 위한 한영구조에 나타난 유생성 차이에 관한 비교 연구", 영어교육연구, 9, pp.145~164 (1998)
- 김은일, "유생성의 문법", 현대문법연구, 20, pp.71~96 (2000)
- 김은일, "부호화 체계화 번역" (2010), 한국문화사
- 김은일, "주어 생략과 모호성 조건", 언어과학연구, (37), pp.93~112 (2006), 언어과학회
- 김형정, "한국어 입말 담화의 결속성 연구-생략 현상을 중심으로", 텍스트언어학, 13, pp.241~265 (2002), 한국텍스트언어학회
- 서정수, "국어문법" (1996), 한양대학교 출판원
- 서정수, "현대국어문법" (1996), 한양대학교 출판원
- 신진원, "영한 번역에서의 지시 관계 대응 연구", 언어과학, 17(1), pp.81~102 (2010), 한국언어과학회
- 양명희, "현대국어 대용어에 대한 연구" (1998), 태학사
- Baker,M, "In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation" (1992), Routledge
- Brown,C, "Topic Continuity in Written English Narrative, In Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-language Study", pp.313~341 (1983), Jonh Benjamins
- Givón,T, "Topic Continuity in Discourse: An Introduction, In Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-language Study", pp.1~41 (1983), Jonh Benjamins
- Ikegami,Y, "'Do-Language' and 'Become-Language': Two Contrasting Types of Linguistic Representation, In The Empire of Signs: Semiotic Essays on Japanese Culture", pp.285~326 (1991), John Benjamins
- Ji, L., "Culture, Language and Categorization. Unpublished manuscript" (2002), Queens University
- Malone,J.L, "The Science of Linguistics in the Art of Translation" (1988), State University of New York Press
- Nisbett,R.E, "The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently and Why" (2003), The Free Press