의미/화용적 해석에 따른 문장 조응사의 영한번역
English-Korean Translation of Sentential Anaphora Based on Semantic/Pragmatic Interpretations
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study verifies the referential relationship between the sentential anaphor ‘it’ and ‘that’ in English and functionally corresponding anaphors in Korean within the purview of semantics/pragmatics by a quantitative survey that zeroes in on the anaphoric selection both in ST and in TT. Referentially differentiated in two main aspects: the givenness (new vs. old) of information and the width (narrow vs. wide) of reference, these pragmatic properties between ST and TT are identified by an experimental survey, in which we confirm that a sentential anaphor ‘that’ is identified with a sentential anaphor ‘kuke’ when it refers to a new information, while ‘it’ with a ‘kuken’ when it refers to an old information, On the other hand, a sentential anaphor ‘that’ is identified with a sentential anaphor ‘kuken’ when it points narrowly to the utterance itself, while ‘it’ with a ‘kulenken’ when it evokes widely its relevant contexts in addition to the utterance itself. In the meantime, we can infer that the anaphoric forms in ST and TT have a statistically significant effect on the ‘subjects’ degree of acceptability (i.e. translation) for each anaphor in terms of givenness, and that there are statistically significant interactions between two referential properties and the anaphoric forms in both languages.
Abstract
This study verifies the referential relationship between the sentential anaphor ‘it’ and ‘that’ in English and functionally corresponding anaphors in Korean within the purview of semantics/pragmatics by a quantitative survey that zeroes in on the anaphoric selection both in ST and in TT. Referentially differentiated in two main aspects: the givenness (new vs. old) of information and the width (narrow vs. wide) of reference, these pragmatic properties between ST and TT are identified by an experimental survey, in which we confirm that a sentential anaphor ‘that’ is identified with a sentential anaphor ‘kuke’ when it refers to a new information, while ‘it’ with a ‘kuken’ when it refers to an old information, On the other hand, a sentential anaphor ‘that’ is identified with a sentential anaphor ‘kuken’ when it points narrowly to the utterance itself, while ‘it’ with a ‘kulenken’ when it evokes widely its relevant contexts in addition to the utterance itself. In the meantime, we can infer that the anaphoric forms in ST and TT have a statistically significant effect on the ‘subjects’ degree of acceptability (i.e. translation) for each anaphor in terms of givenness, and that there are statistically significant interactions between two referential properties and the anaphoric forms in both languages.
참고문헌 (20)
- 이성범, "추론의 화용론: 언어와 추론" (2001), 한국문화사
- 이성범, "영어 지시표현의 이해: 인지·화용적 접근" (2005), 부북스
- Ariel, M, "Interpreting Anaphoric Expressions: A Cognitive Approach versus a Pragmatic Approach", Journal of Linguistics, 30, pp.3~42 (1994)
- Ariel, M, "Defining Pragmatics" (2010), Cambridge University Press
- Fox, A, "Discourse Structure and Anaphora: Written and Conversational English" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Givón, T, "Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-Language Study", pp.1~42 (1983), John Benjamins
- Gundel, K, "Information Structure and Referential Givenness", Newness: How Much Belongs in the Grammar, 2003, pp.4, 177~199
- Gundel, J. K, "Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse", Language, 69(2), pp.274~307 (1993)
- Halliday, K, "Cohesion in English" (1976), Longman
- Huang, Y, "Discourse Anaphora: Four Theoretical Models", Journal of Pragmatics, 32, pp.151~176 (2000)
- Huang, Y, "Anaphora: A Cross-Linguistic Study" (2000), Oxford University Press
- Huang, Y, "Pragmatics" (2007), Oxford University Press
- Kamio, A, "Honor of Susumu Kuno", pp.289~315 (1999), John Benjamins
- Kim, S, "A Corpus-based Analysis of Discourse Anaphora in English and Korean: A Neo-Gricean Pragmatic Approach", Ph.D, pp.2013
- Levinson, C, "Pragmatics" (1983), Cambridge University Press
- Levinson, C, "Pragmatics and the Grammar of Anaphora: A Partial Pragmatic Reduction of Binding and Control Phenomena", Journal of Linguistics, 23, pp.379~434 (1987)
- Levinson, C, "Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature" (2000), MIT Press
- Linde, C, "Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax", pp.337~353 (1979), Academic Press
- Prince, F, "Radical Pragmatics", pp.223~255 (1981), Academic Press
- Strauss, G, "Why ‘This’ and ‘That’ are not Complete without ‘It’", Chicago Linguistic Society, 29, pp.403~417 (1993)