본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

주격 인칭대명사의 생략과 번역 - 『프라자 호텔』의 프랑스어 번역을 중심으로 -

Translations of deleted subjects in Korean - Focusing on French Translations of Plaza Hotel -

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Subject deletion is a common phenomenon in Korean whereas it is not allowed in French. This makes translators of Korean literature into French burdened with finding what the deleted subject is and how it should be expressed in translation. We examined two translated versions of Plaza Hotel by Mi-wol Kim in order to see how they dealt with the deleted subjects in the original work. Of the 176 deleted subjects in the first-person original version. Le Plaza Hotel translated 141 subjects(80.1%) overtly, whereas Ĥôtel Plaza translated 136 subjects(77.3%) with overt subjects. Comparing these results with the English and German translations of Plaza Hotel by Han-sik Kim et al.(2019), we found a slight difference, but they all used a common strategy to recover the deleted subjects and translate them. The French translators used overt subjects most often, or changed them into the objective case or a noun phrase with a possessive adjective. Both translations changed the sentence structure of 20% of the cases, or combined the sentences so that there would not be deleted subjects as in the original version.

Abstract

Subject deletion is a common phenomenon in Korean whereas it is not allowed in French. This makes translators of Korean literature into French burdened with finding what the deleted subject is and how it should be expressed in translation. We examined two translated versions of Plaza Hotel by Mi-wol Kim in order to see how they dealt with the deleted subjects in the original work. Of the 176 deleted subjects in the first-person original version. Le Plaza Hotel translated 141 subjects(80.1%) overtly, whereas Ĥôtel Plaza translated 136 subjects(77.3%) with overt subjects. Comparing these results with the English and German translations of Plaza Hotel by Han-sik Kim et al.(2019), we found a slight difference, but they all used a common strategy to recover the deleted subjects and translate them. The French translators used overt subjects most often, or changed them into the objective case or a noun phrase with a possessive adjective. Both translations changed the sentence structure of 20% of the cases, or combined the sentences so that there would not be deleted subjects as in the original version.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 국립국어원, "한국어 문법1" (2007), 커뮤니케이션북스
  2. 김경희, "문학번역에서의‘삭제’의 문제", 통번역교육연구, 17(3), pp.5~32 (2019), 한국통번역교육학회[DOI]
  3. 김성훈, "텍스트에서의 생략현상에 대한 연구", 텍스트언어학, 1, pp.387~420 (1994)
  4. 김순길, "텍스트에서의 인칭대명사 생략현상 및 요인", 중국조선어문, 178, pp.25~30 (2012)
  5. 김일웅, "대명사의 생략 현상", 언어연구, 7, pp.1~20 (1984)
  6. 김한식, "인칭대명사 생략 문장의 A-B번역 양상: 소설 <프라자호텔>을 중심으로", 통역과 번역, 21(3), pp.31~54 (2019), 한국통역번역학회[DOI]
  7. 박정섭, "정보 구조와 한불 번역에서 주어의 처리 문제", 프랑스어문교육, (33), pp.331~356 (2010), 한국프랑스어문교육학회
  8. 조재룡, "번역은 무엇으로 승리하는가?", 문학동네, 90(1), pp.1~21 (2017)
  9. Mounin, Georges, "Les Problèmes théoriques de la traduction" (1963), Gallimard
  10. Seleskovitch, Danica, "Traduire, de l'expérience au concept", Etudes de Linguistique Appliquée, 24 (1976), Didier
  11. 김미월, "프라자 호텔" (2011), 창비
  12. 한강, "채식주의자" (2007), 창비
  13. Han, Kang, "The Vegetarian" (2015), Portobello
  14. Han, Kang, "La végétarienne" (2016), Le Livre de Poche
  15. Kim, Mi-wol, "Le Plaza Hotel", Koreana, 17(3) (2016), The Korea Foundation
  16. Kim,Mi-wol, "Hôtel Plaza" (2016), Magellan & Cie

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)