한국어의 1·2인칭 주어 생략 현상에 대한 재고: 명시적 주어 표현의 화용적 의미를 중심으로
A Reconsideration of the Omission of First and Second Person Subjects in Modern Spoken Korean: Focusing on the Pragmatic Meanings of the Overt Subject Expressions
0
조회
0
다운로드
15
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The present study aims to shed light on the pragmatic meanings of the overt expressions of the first and second person subjects in modern spoken Korean. As a pro-drop language, Korean omits its first and second person subjects in approximately 70-80% of cases. This phenomenon of ‘subject omission’ has been studied mostly at syntactic level in Korean linguistics. However, a discourse analytic approach could provide more diverse explanations for the phenomenon, particularly in the cases where subjects are overtly expressed, rather than omitted. In this study, I investigate the distribution of overtly expressed first and second person subjects in a Korean spoken corpus and attempt to refine our understanding of the pragmatic and sociolinguistic effects of the overt expression of first and second person subjects. The results show that there are age and gender is related to the distribution of first and second person subject expressions and on the occurrence of various person references. I argue that Korean speakers tend to utilise the overt first and second person subjects to display their social relationships and thereby convey their pragmatic intentions such as expressing intimacy.
Abstract
The present study aims to shed light on the pragmatic meanings of the overt expressions of the first and second person subjects in modern spoken Korean. As a pro-drop language, Korean omits its first and second person subjects in approximately 70-80% of cases. This phenomenon of ‘subject omission’ has been studied mostly at syntactic level in Korean linguistics. However, a discourse analytic approach could provide more diverse explanations for the phenomenon, particularly in the cases where subjects are overtly expressed, rather than omitted. In this study, I investigate the distribution of overtly expressed first and second person subjects in a Korean spoken corpus and attempt to refine our understanding of the pragmatic and sociolinguistic effects of the overt expression of first and second person subjects. The results show that there are age and gender is related to the distribution of first and second person subject expressions and on the occurrence of various person references. I argue that Korean speakers tend to utilise the overt first and second person subjects to display their social relationships and thereby convey their pragmatic intentions such as expressing intimacy.
참고문헌 (33)
- 가혜경, "한·일 양국어 1, 인칭 대명사의 용법 비교", 일본어문학, 6, pp.111~133 (1999)
- 김미월, "주어생략문에 대하여", 중국조선어문, 3, pp.48~54 (2010)
- 김수정, "소설 텍스트에서의 주어의 실현 양상 -박완서의 소설 ‘그 가을의 사흘 동안’을 중심으로-", 한민족어문학(구 영남어문학), (64), pp.37~70 (2013), 한민족어문학회
- 김우성, "스페인어의 주어 생략 – 한국어 주어 생략과의 대조 분석적 관점에서", 이중언어학회지, 13, pp.267~287 (1996)
- 김해연, "한국어 대화상에서의 화자와 청자에 대한 지칭 표현", 담화와 인지, 6(1), pp.73~100 (1999)
- 김혜영, "남성과 여성의 사적 대화에서 발화 특성 연구: 담화 기능 분석을 중심으로", 언어와언어학, (53), pp.89~108 (2011), 언어연구소
- 남기심, "표준 국어 문법론" (2013), 탑 출판사
- 박청희, "한국어와 영어의 생략 현상에 대한 통계적 접근 -주어와 목적어의 생략을 중심으로-", 어문논집, (66), pp.171~192 (2012), 민족어문학회
- 양동휘, "한국어의 대용사론", 국어학, 15, pp.41~162 (1986)
- 오명기, "영어와 국어 2인칭대명사의 화용적, 사회언어학적 용법", 현대문법연구, (66), pp.273~289 (2011), 현대문법학회
- 이성범, "생략적 발화의 화용적 기능", 담화와 인지, 16(1), pp.63~82 (2009), 담화·인지언어학회
- 이필영, "현대국어의 1∙2인칭 표현에 대하여", 관악어문연구, 12, pp.209~229 (1987)
- 임홍빈, "국어의 ‘통사적인’ 공범주에 대하여", 어학연구, 21(3), pp.331~384 (1985)
- 정무주, "인칭대명사와 담화역할", 현대문법연구, 12, pp.169~186 (1998)
- 정연창, "주어 생략에 대한 소고", 언어과학, 14(2), pp.101~120 (2007), 한국언어과학회
- 안현정, "A Study of Topic Prominence in Korean", 인문과학연구, (33), pp.81~101 (2012), 인문과학연구소[DOI]
- Korean Linguistics, "Japanese", pp.1997, Clancy, Patricia M.
- Davidson, Brad, "‘Pragmatic weight’ and Spanish subject pronouns : The pragmatic and discourse uses of ‘tu´’ and ‘yo’ in spoken Madrid Spanish", Journal of Pragmatics, 26(4), pp.543~565 (1996)
- Homes, Janet, "Women’s talk : The question of sociolinguistic universals", Australian Journal of Communication, 20(3), pp.125~149 (1998)
- Huang, C. T. James, "On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns", Linguistic Inquiry, 15(4), pp.531~574 (1984)
- Kim, Chul-Kyu, "Personal pronouns in English and Korean texts : A corpus-based study in terms of textual interaction", Journal of Pragmatics, 41(10), pp.2086~2099 (2009)
- 김은성, "Strategic Use of Third Person References in Korean Conversation", 응용언어학, 27(3), pp.105~127 (2011), 한국응용언어학회
- Kim, Young-Joo, "Subject", object drop in the acquisition of Korean : A cross-linguistic comparison, 2000, pp.9(4), 325~351
- Kuo, Sai-Hua, "Involvement vs. detachment : Gender differences in the use of personal pronouns in televised sports in Taiwan", Discourse Studies, 5(4), pp.479~494 (2003)
- Kwon, Nayoung., "Null pronominal(pro)resolution in Korean, a discourse-oriented language", Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(3), pp.377~387 (2013)
- Lee, Duck-Young., "The role of the overt expression of first and second person subject in Japanese", Journal of Pragmatics, 40, pp.733~767 (2008)
- Lee, Hong Bae, "On empty categories in Korean", Korean Journal of Linguistics, 12(2), pp.261~294 (1987)
- Lee, Hong Bae, "Theories of the null subject parameter and Korean", Korean Journal of Linguistics, 18(2), pp.331~361 (1993)
- Levinson, Stephen C., "Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature" (2000), MIT Press
- Oh, Sun-Young, "Overt reference to speaker and recipient in Korean", Discourse Studies, 9(4), pp.462~492 (2007)
- 박명관, "Structurally Ambiguous Empty Nominal Pro-forms in Korean", 언어, 37(4), pp.825~843 (2012), 한국언어학회
- Tannen, Deborah., "You just don’t understand( Women and men in conversion" (1990), William Morrow
- Wales, Katie., "Personal pronouns in present-day English" (1996), Cambridge University Press