영한번역에서 나타나는 서술어 증가 현상과 구조적 중의성의 문제
Increase in Verb Phrases and the Problem of Structural Ambiguity in English-Korean Translation
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The typological differences between English and Korean have led to various English-Korean translation strategies. Especially, it is notable that noun phrases in English tend to be translated into verb phrases in Korean. The main factor is that English is an object-dominant language, while Korean is an action-dominant language. The virtue of this strategy is naturalness of the style. The increase in the number of verb phrases in translated sentences, however, can pose a problem. The verb phrases produced from English noun phrases are usually incomplete in the way that they miss some constituents such as a subject. If these phrases are put in the middle of a matrix clause, structural ambiguity can arise between these phrases and some constituents of the matrix clause. Therefore, parsing these phrases goes wrong and results in misunderstanding of the whole sentence. To avoid this problem, two strategies are proposed: rearranging word order and avoiding new verb phrases. When the translation strategy for naturalness is used, the ambiguity factor should be considered in order to enhance the readability and accuracy of the target text.
Abstract
The typological differences between English and Korean have led to various English-Korean translation strategies. Especially, it is notable that noun phrases in English tend to be translated into verb phrases in Korean. The main factor is that English is an object-dominant language, while Korean is an action-dominant language. The virtue of this strategy is naturalness of the style. The increase in the number of verb phrases in translated sentences, however, can pose a problem. The verb phrases produced from English noun phrases are usually incomplete in the way that they miss some constituents such as a subject. If these phrases are put in the middle of a matrix clause, structural ambiguity can arise between these phrases and some constituents of the matrix clause. Therefore, parsing these phrases goes wrong and results in misunderstanding of the whole sentence. To avoid this problem, two strategies are proposed: rearranging word order and avoiding new verb phrases. When the translation strategy for naturalness is used, the ambiguity factor should be considered in order to enhance the readability and accuracy of the target text.
참고문헌 (20)
- 김기중, "리더빌리티-읽기의 이론과 실제" (1993), 일진사
- 김미형, "인지적 대조언어학의 방법론 연구" (2010), 한국문화사
- 서계인, "실전 영어 번역의 기술" (2004), 북라인
- 송경안, "언어유형론1" (2008), 도서출판 월인
- 오미형, "영한 번역 도착어 텍스트 재구성 능력 제고를 위한 교육적 방안 연구", 통번역교육연구, 5(1), pp.109~128 (2007)
- 원은하, "영한번역에서 구조적 중의성의 처리 전략: 내포문 구성을 중심으로", 번역학연구, 13(1), pp.87~114 (2012), 한국번역학회
- 이영옥, "무생물 주어 타동사 구문의 영한번역", 번역학연구, 2(1), pp.53~76 (2001)
- 이영옥, "한국어와 영어간 언어구조의 차이에 따른 번역의 문제 인용문의 번역을 중심으로", 번역학연구, 3(1), pp.59~81 (2002), 한국번역학회
- 이창수, "한국어-영어간의 정보배열의 구조적 차이가 동시통역에 끼치는 영향", 통번역학연구, 1, pp.1~22 (1997)
- 정호정, "언어구조적 차이와 번역", 통번역학연구, 3, pp.127~47 (1999)
- 조명한, "언어심리학" (2004), 학지사
- 진실로, "담화의 정보흐름에 기초한 영한번역 전략", 박사, pp.2007
- Harley, T, "The Psychology of Language" (2001), Psychology
- Talmy, L., "Lexicalization Patterns: Semantic Structure in Lexical Forms, In Language Typology and Syntactic Description", pp.57~149 (1985), Cambridge UP
- Botton, A, "Status Anxiety" (2005), Vintage
- 정영목, "불안" (2005), 이레
- Toffler, A, "Revolutionary Wealth" (2006), Knopf
- 김중웅, "부의미래" (2006), 청림출판
- Zinn, H., "A People's History of the United States" (2005), Harper Collins
- 유강은, "미국민중사 1" (2008), 도서출판 이후