영어 대상지배언어 특성과 한국어 대응형에서의 행동지배언어 특성에 관한 연구
A Study on the Object-Dominant Characteristics of English and Action-Dominance of Korean Counterparts
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper explores the comparison of the characteristics of object-dominant English and action-dominant Korean counterparts. In this paper it is claimed that English as the object-dominant language and Korean as the action-dominant language show the following five linguistic features. The first concerns the plural markings. The plural inflections in English nouns depend on the inherent plurality of entities or objects involved, while the plural marking –tul in Korean typically shows context-dependency in the given event. The marking –tul typically requires the distributive reading of entities or plural events in the given context. The second concerns the modification structures for head nouns. The head nouns in the noun phrases in English may take the complex structures of modification for noun phrases(NP) which include pre- and post-modifications, while the those in the NPs in Korean usually take only the simple pre-modification. The third concerns English light verb construction, in which the action nouns take main verbal lexical contents, while Korean counterparts have a relatively limited usage of the construction and undergo the easy process of verbalization. The fourth concerns stative ‘be+prepositional phrase’ combinations in English, which often convey the dynamic meanings, while the dynamic equivalent in Korean should express the relevant verbs for the event. Finally, the fifth one concerns the conflation of English motion verbs, while Korean motion verbs are not conflated but realized as servial verbs. All the five features are argued to serve to indicate the object vs. action dominance of each language.
Abstract
This paper explores the comparison of the characteristics of object-dominant English and action-dominant Korean counterparts. In this paper it is claimed that English as the object-dominant language and Korean as the action-dominant language show the following five linguistic features. The first concerns the plural markings. The plural inflections in English nouns depend on the inherent plurality of entities or objects involved, while the plural marking –tul in Korean typically shows context-dependency in the given event. The marking –tul typically requires the distributive reading of entities or plural events in the given context. The second concerns the modification structures for head nouns. The head nouns in the noun phrases in English may take the complex structures of modification for noun phrases(NP) which include pre- and post-modifications, while the those in the NPs in Korean usually take only the simple pre-modification. The third concerns English light verb construction, in which the action nouns take main verbal lexical contents, while Korean counterparts have a relatively limited usage of the construction and undergo the easy process of verbalization. The fourth concerns stative ‘be+prepositional phrase’ combinations in English, which often convey the dynamic meanings, while the dynamic equivalent in Korean should express the relevant verbs for the event. Finally, the fifth one concerns the conflation of English motion verbs, while Korean motion verbs are not conflated but realized as servial verbs. All the five features are argued to serve to indicate the object vs. action dominance of each language.
참고문헌 (20)
- 강범모, "복수성과 복수 표지: '들'을 중심으로", 언어학, (47), pp.3~31 (2007), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 고광윤, "영어 경동사 Have와 Take의 변이에 대한 코퍼스 기반 연구", 영어학연구, 21(1), pp.1~27 (2015), 한국영어학학회[DOI]
- 김선희, "경동사 구문에 대한 연구—술어명사의 역할을 중심으로", 영어영문학21, 31(4), pp.175~203 (2018), 21세기영어영문학회[DOI]
- 김현지, "한국어 ‘수식어+명사’ 구조 사용 양상 연구", 언어와 문화, 10(1), pp.29~54 (2014), 한국언어문화교육학회[DOI]
- 남기심, "표준국어문법론" (1985), 탑출판사
- 박기성, "영어와 한국어 의미론 비교 연구: 이론과 실제" (2009), 동인출판사
- 박기성, "대상지배적", 행동지배적 언어유형론과 영어와 한국어 복수표지의 상호작용, 2017, pp.(44), 17~34[DOI]
- 백미현, "한국어 복수 의미 연구", 담화와 인지, 9(2), pp.59~78 (2002), 담화·인지언어학회
- 윤소연, "한국어 경동사 구문의 강제와 사용빈도: 말뭉치 연구", 언어연구, 37(3), pp.317~334 (2021), 한국현대언어학회[DOI]
- 전영철, "한국어 복수 표현의 의미론: ‘들’의 통합적 해석", 언어학, (49), pp.337~359 (2007), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 정경숙, "영어 복수 명사 번역과 한국어 형태소 ‘-들’의 의미", 새한영어영문학, 53(3), pp.237~262 (2011), 새한영어영문학회[DOI]
- 정대식, "한국어 경동사 논의에 대한 검토 - ‘하다’를 중심으로 -", 언어학, (76), pp.87~116 (2016), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 최형강, "복수와 반복 -‘들’의 의미 기능을 중심으로-", 한국어 의미학, 27, pp.315~341 (2008), 한국어의미학회
- Downing, A., "A University Course in English Grammar" (1992), Routledge
- Sung-ChoolIm, "Typological Patterns of Motion Verbs in Korean", 담화와 인지, 9(1), pp.123~150 (2002), 담화·인지언어학회
- 조윤경, "Two Types of Korean Light Verb Constructions", 영어영문학21, 31(1), pp.205~226 (2018), 21세기영어영문학회[DOI]
- Link, G., "Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language", pp.302~323 (1983), Walter de Gruyter
- McKay, T., "Plural Predication" (2006), Oxford University Press
- Talmy, L., "Toward a Cognitive Semantics: Concept Structuring Systems" (2000), The MIT Press
- Talmy, L., "Toward a Cognitive Semantics: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring" (2000), The MIT Press
