영어와 한국어의 비유정성 주어 타동사 구문 재고
Transitive Constructions with Inanimate Subjects in English and Korean Revisited
1
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It is generally observed that transitive constructions with inanimate subjects are not usually preferred either in English or Korean. However, Korean exhibits a much stronger nonpreference for those constructions than English. To account for this difference between English and Korean, Kim et al.(2009) resort to ‘animacy,’ whereas Jang(2009) employs ‘agentivity.’ However, since these concepts, ‘animacy’ and ‘agentivity,’ serve as primary factors in determining the subject of a transitive construction both in English and Korean, neither Kim et al.’s or Jang’s analysis effectively explains the strong tendency of avoiding inanimate subjects in Korean transitive constructions. In this context, we analyze both literary and nonliterary English-Korean translation data and discuss the strategies to avoid inanimate subjects in transitive sentences observed in the data. We attempt to account for this avoidance in terms of the difference in the ‘subject hierarchies’ of English and Korean
Abstract
It is generally observed that transitive constructions with inanimate subjects are not usually preferred either in English or Korean. However, Korean exhibits a much stronger nonpreference for those constructions than English. To account for this difference between English and Korean, Kim et al.(2009) resort to ‘animacy,’ whereas Jang(2009) employs ‘agentivity.’ However, since these concepts, ‘animacy’ and ‘agentivity,’ serve as primary factors in determining the subject of a transitive construction both in English and Korean, neither Kim et al.’s or Jang’s analysis effectively explains the strong tendency of avoiding inanimate subjects in Korean transitive constructions. In this context, we analyze both literary and nonliterary English-Korean translation data and discuss the strategies to avoid inanimate subjects in transitive sentences observed in the data. We attempt to account for this avoidance in terms of the difference in the ‘subject hierarchies’ of English and Korean
참고문헌 (33)
- 김성옥, "영한번역 텍스트의 주제(Topic) 비교 - 정보구조이론을 바탕으로", 언어과학, 20(1), pp.1~24 (2013), 한국언어과학회
- Fitzgerald, F. S., "위대한 개츠비" (2010), 민음사
- 김은일, "유생성(animacy)이 영한 번역에 미치는 영향", 언어과학, 16(1), pp.23~40 (2009), 한국언어과학회
- Gladwell, M., "아웃라이어즈" (2009), 김영사
- 서정수, "국어문법" (1996), 한양대학교 출판원
- 성백환, "무생물 주어로 시작되는 타동사 문장의 순차번역 전략", 번역학연구, 7(1), pp.105~129 (2006), 한국번역학회
- 이영옥, "무생물주어 타동사구문의 영․한 번역", 번역학연구, 2(1), pp.53~76 (2001)
- 이한나, "비유정성 주어 타동사 구문의 영한 번역", 석사, 영어영문학과, pp.2014
- 장영준, "영·한 번역에서의 주어선택과 행위자성", 번역학연구, 10(2), pp.105~132 (2009), 한국번역학회
- 조인정, "영어권 한국어 학습자의 오류--무정성 주어와 타동사 구문-", 한국어교육, 16(3), pp.331~377 (2005), 국제한국어교육학회
- Croft, W., "Typology and Universals" (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Cruse, D. A., "Some Thoughts on Agentivity", Journal of Linguistics, 9, pp.11~23 (1973)
- Dixon, R. M. W., "Ergativity", Language, 55(1), pp.59~138 (1979)
- Fillmore, C., "Universals in Linguistic Theory" (1968), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
- Fillmore, C., "Linguistic Structures Processing" (1977), North-Holland
- Fitzgerald, F. S., "The Great Gatsby" (2000), Penguin Books
- Frawley, W., "Linguistic Semantics" (1992), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Givón, T., "English Grammar: A function-based introduction, (Vol. 1.)" (1993), John Benjamins
- Givón, T., "Syntax: An introduction, (Vol. I & II)" (2001), John Benjamins
- Gladwell, M., "Outliers" (2008), Back Bay Books
- Heo, S, "Thematic Roles of Arguments in English-Korean Translation", Journal of Linguistic Studies, 15(2), pp.235~246 (2010)
- Hopper, P. J., "Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse", Language, 56, pp.251~299 (1980)
- Jackendoff, R., "Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar" (1972), MIT Press
- Jackendoff, R., "Semantic Structures" (1990), MIT Press
- Kemmer, S., "Causative Constructions and Cognitive Model: The English Make Causative", The First International Conference on Discourse and Cognitive Linguistics: Perspectives for the 21st Century, pp.803~832 (2001)
- Langacker, R. W., "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive Application" (1991), Stanford University Press
- "Newsweek Vol. 160 Issues 1-3", ~ (2012)
- Meier, C., "sub8-Sinn und Bedeutung 177" (2004), Arbeitspaper
- Saeed, J. I., "Semantics" (2009), Blackwell
- Talmy, L., "Syntax and Semantics, vol. 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions" (1976), Academic Press
- Tamly, L, "Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition", Cognitive Science, 12, pp.49~100 (1988)
- John Williamson, "How Animacy and Agenthood Influence Argument Order in the Translation of English Passive Constructions to Korean", 번역학연구, 14(5), pp.263~283 (2013), 한국번역학회