주어 상승/비상승 구문의 한/영 통ㆍ번역
Korean-to-English Interpreting and Translation of Subject Raising and Non-Subject Raising Constructions
1
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper I focused on the problems arising due to syntactic differences of subject raising and non-subject raising constructions of English and Korean. In English a predicate such as seem and likely is a subject raising predicate. In Korean a predicate such as (kes) kat-ta is a subject raising predicate. In English subject and non-subject raising constructions appear to have different sentence structures, but in Korean it appears that there is no difference between the two types of constructions. The English subject and non-subject raising constructions have different implications and usages and so they are used in different contexts or situations. If they are misused in inappropriate contexts, they would sound wrong. The same is true of Korean subject and non-subject raising constructions. However, as Korean subject and non-subject raising constructions appear to have the same kind of structure, interpreters and translators may experience trouble when interpreting and translating the constructions into English. In this paper I discussed this problem in detail and suggested a way to overcome the problem.
Abstract
In this paper I focused on the problems arising due to syntactic differences of subject raising and non-subject raising constructions of English and Korean. In English a predicate such as seem and likely is a subject raising predicate. In Korean a predicate such as (kes) kat-ta is a subject raising predicate. In English subject and non-subject raising constructions appear to have different sentence structures, but in Korean it appears that there is no difference between the two types of constructions. The English subject and non-subject raising constructions have different implications and usages and so they are used in different contexts or situations. If they are misused in inappropriate contexts, they would sound wrong. The same is true of Korean subject and non-subject raising constructions. However, as Korean subject and non-subject raising constructions appear to have the same kind of structure, interpreters and translators may experience trouble when interpreting and translating the constructions into English. In this paper I discussed this problem in detail and suggested a way to overcome the problem.
참고문헌 (16)
- 염행일, "An Analysis of Performance in Korean-into-English Simultaneous Interpretation", 통번역교육연구, 8(1), pp.111~131 (2010), 한국통번역교육학회
- 염행일, "학부 통역교육 -영한 문장구역통역 텍스트를 중심으로", 통번역교육연구, 11(1), pp.43~57 (2013), 한국통번역교육학회
- 이광호, "표현 양식 차이로 인한 한", 영 번역의 문제, 2011, pp.9(1), 145~162[DOI]
- 이정식, "순행, 역행 상승: 국어 ‘것’ 내부분열문", 언어연구, 25(4), pp.757~776 (2010), 한국현대언어학회
- Alexander, L. G., "Longman English Grammar" (1988), Longman
- Chomsky, N., "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory" (2008), MIT Press
- Eastwood, J., "Oxford Practice Grammar" (2003), Oxford University Press
- Greenbaum, S., "Understanding Minimalism" (2005), Cambridge University Press
- Hewings, M., "Advanced Grammar in Use" (1999), Cambridge University Press
- 이광호, "Problems in Translating Similar Expressions to and from English and Korean", 통번역교육연구, 8(1), pp.133~150 (2010), 한국통번역교육학회
- Murphy, R., "Grammar in Use" (2000), Cambridge University Press
- Quirk, R., "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
- Swan, M., "Practical English Usage" (2005), Oxford University Press
- Yule, G., "Explaining English Grammar" (2003), Oxford University Press