이중주어 구문의 한영번역유형 연구
A Study on English Translation Types of So-Called Double Subject Constructions in Korean
1
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article deals with so-called double subject constructions in Korean, which have been one of the main concerns in Korean linguistics. Unlike other studies, this study focuses on English translations of these constructions. Having more than one subject may cause problems in English translation of these constructions, since there should be only one subject in a sentence in English. In our study, 50 frequently-cited double subject constructions are translated into English by multiple translators in an unbiased way, allowing possible alternative translations. For 104 translated sentences, we compare and contrast them with original double subject constructions in Korean and finally categorize them into 5 types. Each type shows the various relationships between subjects and other elements in double subject constructions. This categorization can be a guideline for English translations of the constructions and also may shed lights on the nature of the construction itself. Since there are various relationships between elements, a single type of approach cannot account for the construction as a whole. Instead categorized approaches seem more desirable for the construction. The fact that the seemingly similar data are analyzed in several different ways shows that the construction itself is an example of superficial coincidence of various meaningful relationships underneath.
Abstract
This article deals with so-called double subject constructions in Korean, which have been one of the main concerns in Korean linguistics. Unlike other studies, this study focuses on English translations of these constructions. Having more than one subject may cause problems in English translation of these constructions, since there should be only one subject in a sentence in English. In our study, 50 frequently-cited double subject constructions are translated into English by multiple translators in an unbiased way, allowing possible alternative translations. For 104 translated sentences, we compare and contrast them with original double subject constructions in Korean and finally categorize them into 5 types. Each type shows the various relationships between subjects and other elements in double subject constructions. This categorization can be a guideline for English translations of the constructions and also may shed lights on the nature of the construction itself. Since there are various relationships between elements, a single type of approach cannot account for the construction as a whole. Instead categorized approaches seem more desirable for the construction. The fact that the seemingly similar data are analyzed in several different ways shows that the construction itself is an example of superficial coincidence of various meaningful relationships underneath.
참고문헌 (9)
- 남기심, "이중주어구문 재고. In: 국어 문법의 탐구 I", pp.52~67 (1996), 태학사
- 목정수, "국어 이중주어 구문의 새로운 해석", 언어학, 7(41), pp.75~99 (2005), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 박철우, "국어의 문장 화제 - 이중 주어 구문과 관련하여", 언어연구, 14, pp.35~51 (1996)
- 서정수, "국어의 이중주어 문제 - 변형생성문법적 분석", 국어국문학, 52, pp.1~28 (1971)
- 안명철, "이중주어 구문과 구-동사", 국어학, 38, pp.181~207 (2001)
- 양정석, "‘이중주어문’의 네 가지 유형", 사림어문연구, 6, pp.83~117 (1989)
- 이남순, "주격중출문의 통사구조", 국어국문학, 93, pp.87~115 (1985)
- 이정택, "이른바 중주어문에 관하여", 청람어문교육, 24(34), pp.243~258 (2006), 청람어문교육학회
- 임홍빈, "국어의 주제화 연구", 국어연구, 28, pp.3~108 (1972)
