번역 및 작문 학습에서 1인 동료 피드백과 협동 동료 피드백의 효과 비교 연구
Comparative Study of Pair Peer Feedback and Joint Peer Feedback on English Translation and Writing
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Translation is a commonly used method to improve general English skills. This study was to investigate the better way to provide feedback on translated works as well as writing. The study examined whether pair peer feedback and joint peer feedback had any effect on students’ English translation and writing. A total of 120 students were chosen in the study with four conditions: (1) Pair peer feedback group (low to intermediate level), (2) Joint peer feedback group (low to intermediate level), (3) Pair peer feedback group (advanced level), (4) Joint peer feedback group (advanced level). Results showed that all groups utilized a variety of feedback to their peers, and regardless of their proficiency, they provided more grammar feedback on translated works. However, students at the high proficiency level with joint peer feedback produced more content-based feedback rather than grammar feedback on writing. All groups preferred joint peer feedback over pair peer feedback on translated works as well as writing.
Abstract
Translation is a commonly used method to improve general English skills. This study was to investigate the better way to provide feedback on translated works as well as writing. The study examined whether pair peer feedback and joint peer feedback had any effect on students’ English translation and writing. A total of 120 students were chosen in the study with four conditions: (1) Pair peer feedback group (low to intermediate level), (2) Joint peer feedback group (low to intermediate level), (3) Pair peer feedback group (advanced level), (4) Joint peer feedback group (advanced level). Results showed that all groups utilized a variety of feedback to their peers, and regardless of their proficiency, they provided more grammar feedback on translated works. However, students at the high proficiency level with joint peer feedback produced more content-based feedback rather than grammar feedback on writing. All groups preferred joint peer feedback over pair peer feedback on translated works as well as writing.
참고문헌 (30)
- 마선미, "트위터를 활용한 영작문 수업 : “번역과 발표” 영작문 활동을 중심으로", 통번역교육연구, 15(1), pp.29~54 (2017), 한국통번역교육학회[DOI]
- 오택환, "쓰기 수행평가에서 동료평가자간 신뢰도 분석", 국어교육연구, (47), pp.91~116 (2010), 국어교육학회(since1969)[DOI]
- 최진실, "번역교육에서 동료평가의 내용: 『채식주의자』 번역을 중심으로", 통번역교육연구, 15(3), pp.211~233 (2017), 한국통번역교육학회[DOI]
- Bitchener, J., "The Value of a Focused Approach to Written Corrective Feedback", ELT Journal, 63(3), pp.204~211 (2009)
- 변혜원, "The Effect of Translated Writing Method on Learning Article Differences for EFL Learners", 통번역교육연구, 18(1), pp.45~64 (2020), 한국통번역교육학회[DOI]
- 변혜원, "A Study on Article Errors: Teaching Articles Through Translated Writing Method", 통번역교육연구, 15(1), pp.79~102 (2017), 한국통번역교육학회[DOI]
- 조윤경, "The Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Korean EFL Writing Classrooms", 영어교육연구, 17(4), pp.33~59 (2005), 팬코리아영어교육학회
- Cho, K., "Student Revision with Peer and Expert Reviewing", Learning and Instruction, 20(4), pp.328~338 (2010)
- Cho, K., "ScaffoldedWriting and Rewriting in the Discipline : A Web-based Reciprocal Peer Review System", Computers & Education, 48(3), pp.409~426 (2007)
- Cho, K., "Validity and Reliability of Scaffolded Peer Assessment of Writing from Instructor and Student Perspectives", Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), pp.891~901 (2006)
- Cohen, A. D., "Learner Strategies in Language Learning", pp.57~69 (1987), Prentice Hall
- Fitzgerald, J., "Research on Revision in Writing", Review of Educational Research, 57, pp.481~506 (1987)
- Hafernik, J. J., "The How and Why of Peer Editing in the ESL Writing Class", CATESOLOccasional Papers, 10, pp.48~58 (1984)
- Hedgcock, J., "Collaborative Oral", Aural Revision in Foreign Language Writing Instruction, 1992, pp.1(3), 255~276
- Hillocks, G., "Research onWritten Composition: NewDirections for Teaching" (1986), ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills
- 김보람, "Examining the Effects of Trained Peer Feedback on EFL Students’ Writing", 영어어문교육, 15(2), pp.151~168 (2009), 한국영어어문교육학회
- 김양희, "A Study of Students' Reactions to Writing Activities in English Composition Classes", 현대영어교육, 12(4), pp.107~128 (2011), 현대영어교육학회
- 이영화, "Exploring the Talk in EFL Students’ Peer Feedback: Content, Perspectives, and Desire", 영어교육연구, 23(1), pp.109~128 (2011), 팬코리아영어교육학회[DOI]
- Lundstrom, K., "To Give Is Better than to Receive : The Benefits of Peer Review to the Reviewer’s OwnWriting", Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, pp.30~43 (2009)
- Mendonca, C., "Peer Review Negotiations : Revision Activities in ESLWriting Instruction", TESOLQuarterly, 28, pp.745~769 (1994)
- Murray, D. E., "Collaborative Language Learning", pp.100~117 (1992), Cambridge University Press
- Nelson, G., "Peer Response Groups: Do L2Writers Use Peer Comments in Revising Their Drafts?", ESOLQuarterly, 27, pp.135~141 (1993)
- Rollinson, P., "Using Peer Feedback in the ESL Writing Class", ELT Journal, 59(1), pp.23~30 (2005)
- Evaluating Text Quality: The Continuum from Text-focused to Reader-focused Methods, "Schriver, K. A.", National Center for the Study ofWriting and Literacy, ~, pp.Technical Report No. 41 (1990)
- Smith, H., "Improving the Quality of Undergraduate Peer Assessment : A Case Study from Psychology", Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39, pp.71~81 (2002)
- Spear, K., "Sharing Writing: Peer Response Groups in English Classes", pp.1988, Boynton
- Topping, K. J., "Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), pp.151~169 (2009)
- Tsui, A. B. M., "Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments?", Journal of Second LanguageWriting, 9, pp.147~170 (2000)
- Yang, M., "A Comparative Study of Peer and Teacher Feedback in Chinese EFL Writing Class", Journal of Second LanguageWriting, 15, pp.179~200 (2006)
- 이지연, "한국 대학생의 영작문 활동 시 나타나는 동료피드백의 양상 및 이에 대한 인식", 현대영어교육, 11(3), pp.134~161 (2010), 현대영어교육학회