피드백 활동이 문장 수정에 끼치는 영향
Effects of Different Types of Feedback on College Students’ Writing Revision
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study investigated the effects of different types of feedback on college English classes . For the study, 144 students participated in each group: (1) teacher feedback group, (2) self-feedback group, (3) peer feedback group, (4) computer feedback group. Results proved that students preferred teacher feedback over any other feedback. It was also revealed that students did not rely on their self-review and peer feedback. However, when students practice giving feedback and applying grammar knowledge to construct sentences, they develop better skills in both self-feedback and peer feedback. Also, traditional grammar-translation method will be, in part, helpful to bring positive outcomes in the class.
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of different types of feedback on college English classes . For the study, 144 students participated in each group: (1) teacher feedback group, (2) self-feedback group, (3) peer feedback group, (4) computer feedback group. Results proved that students preferred teacher feedback over any other feedback. It was also revealed that students did not rely on their self-review and peer feedback. However, when students practice giving feedback and applying grammar knowledge to construct sentences, they develop better skills in both self-feedback and peer feedback. Also, traditional grammar-translation method will be, in part, helpful to bring positive outcomes in the class.
참고문헌 (18)
- 변혜원, "ChatGPT를 활용한 번역과 문법 학습에 관한 비교 연구", 통번역교육연구, 22(3), pp.33~50 (2024)
- 마선미, "번역문과 영작문에서 직접 피드백과 간접 피드백이 수준별 학습자에게 미치는 영향", 통번역교육연구, 21(3), pp.75~91 (2023)
- 민주영, "한국 대학생의 영작문 피드백 활동에 관한 인식 : 자기검토 및 동료피드백과 컴퓨터 피드백", 영어학, 20, pp.335~362 (2020)
- 임택균, "동료 평가를 활용한 쓰기 태도의 향상 방안", 작문연구, 17, pp.385~409 (2013)
- Cho, Y. K., "The Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Korean EFL Writing Classrooms", English Language Teaching, 17(4), pp.33~59 (2005)
- Hillocks, G., "Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching", ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills, ~ (1986)
- Hyland, K., "Feedback on Second Language Students’ Writing", Language Teaching, 39, pp.83~101 (2006)
- Johns, A, "Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues", pp.162~181 (2006), Cambridge University Press
- Kim, Y. H., "A Study of Students’ Reactions toWriting Activities in English Composition Classes", Modern English Education, 12(4), pp.107~128 (2011)
- Koh, W. Y., "Effective Application of Automated Writing Feedback in Process-basedWriting Instruction", English Teaching, 72(3), pp.91~11 (2017)
- Lundstorm, K., "To Give Is Better Than To Receive : The Benefits of Peer Review to the Reviewer’s Own Writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, pp.30~43 (2009)
- Mendonça C. O., "Peer Review Negotiations : Revision Activities in ESLWriting Instruction", TESOLQuarterly, 28, pp.745~769 (1994)
- Nelson, G. L., "ESL Students’ Perceptions of Effectiveness in Peer Response Groups", Journal of Second LanguageWriting, 7, pp.113~131 (1998)
- Nelson, G. L., "Peer Response Groups : Do L2 Writers Use Peer Comments in Revising Their Drafts", TESOLQuarterly, 27, pp.135~142 (1993)
- Rollinson, P., "Using Peer Feedback in the ESL Writing Class", ELT Journal, 59(1), pp.23~30 (2005)
- Ware, P., "Computer-generated Feedback on Student Writing", TESOL Quarterly, 45(4), pp.769~774 (2011)
- Yang, H., "Efficiency of Online Grammar Checker in English Writing Performance and Students’Perceptions", Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 18(3), pp.328~348 (2018)
- Yang, M., "A Comparative Study of Peer and Teacher Feedback in Chinese EFL Writing Class", Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, pp.179~200 (2006)