본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

교사 피드백과 동료 피드백이 학생들의 작문 수정과 향상에 미치는 영향 비교

The Effects of Teacher Feedback and Peer Feedback on EFL College Students’ Writing Revising and Improvement

2

조회

0

다운로드

15

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The present study was performed to find out which feedback is more effective in an EFL composition class. For this purpose, incorporation rates and improvement degree of students’ writing in teacher and peer feedback groups were examined in a process-oriented writing class. The results are as follows. Teacher feedback group incorporates their feedback more than the peer feedback group. The amount of incorporation was statistically significantly different between the two feedback groups and the teacher feedback group had a much higher incorporation rate. The mean scores of the final drafts of both groups increased more than those of the first drafts. Teacher feedback group improved significantly in all five assessment categories, but the peer feedback group significantly improved only in three categories such as content, organization, and grammar. There was a significant difference between two feedback groups in the areas of content and grammar, and the teacher feedback group significantly improved more than the peer feedback group.

Abstract

The present study was performed to find out which feedback is more effective in an EFL composition class. For this purpose, incorporation rates and improvement degree of students’ writing in teacher and peer feedback groups were examined in a process-oriented writing class. The results are as follows. Teacher feedback group incorporates their feedback more than the peer feedback group. The amount of incorporation was statistically significantly different between the two feedback groups and the teacher feedback group had a much higher incorporation rate. The mean scores of the final drafts of both groups increased more than those of the first drafts. Teacher feedback group improved significantly in all five assessment categories, but the peer feedback group significantly improved only in three categories such as content, organization, and grammar. There was a significant difference between two feedback groups in the areas of content and grammar, and the teacher feedback group significantly improved more than the peer feedback group.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. 공정도, "코퍼스를 활용한 영작문 문법오류 피드백의 효과에 관한 사례 연구", 영어영문학연구, 52(3), pp.47~69 (2010), 한국중앙영어영문학회
  2. 강동호, "Feedback on EFL Writing: Teacher, Peer, and Self-review", Foreign Languages Education, 15(1), pp.1~22 (2008), 한국외국어교육학회
  3. 김애주, "과정중심 영작문 수업이 영어 쓰기 능력에 미치는 영향", 영어영문학연구, 55(3), pp.115~135 (2013), 한국중앙영어영문학회
  4. 김양희, "The effectiveness of diverse types of written feedback: Comparative study of teacher and student feedback.", 영어어문교육, 16(4), pp.133~152 (2010), 한국영어어문교육학회
  5. 김지영, "Teacher and peer feedback in process-oriented composition classes and their effects on students' essay revisions", 석사, 영어(외국어교육과), pp.2009
  6. 김한경, "동료 피드백 훈련이 피드백 활동과 영어 쓰기 능력 및 태도에 미치는 영향", 석사, 영어교육학, pp.2010
  7. 손태호, "한국 고등학생 영어 쓰기 수업에서 동료 피드백과 교사 피드백의 효과 비교 연구", 석사, 영어교육, pp.2007
  8. 차윤정, "Effects of synchronous and asynchronous peer feedback on Korean EFL learners' writing", 박사, 영어교육학, pp.2007
  9. 홍순태, "협동학습과정에서 나타난 한국 대학생들의 언어적 상호작용 분석", 영어영문학연구, 55(3), pp.555~594 (2013), 한국중앙영어영문학회
  10. Allaei, S. K., "Assessing second language writing in academic contexts", pp.227~240 (1990), Ablex
  11. Arndt, V., "Teaching composition around the pacific rim: Politics and pedagogy", pp.90~116 (1993), Multilingual Matters
  12. Brannon, L., "On students’ right to their own texts : A model of teacher response", College Composition and Communication, 33, pp.157~166 (1982)
  13. Brice, C., "ESL writers’ reaction to teacher commentary: A case study", Paper presented at the 30th Annual TESOL Convention, Long Beach, CA (1995)
  14. Carson, J. E., "Reading in the composition classroom; Second language perspectives", pp.85~104 (1993), Heinle
  15. Carson, J. G., "Writing groups : Cross-cultural issues", Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, pp.17~30 (1994)
  16. Carson, J. G., "Chinese students’ perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction", Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, pp.1~19 (1996)
  17. Chaudron, C., "Evaluating: Effects of feedback on revision", Paper presented at the 7th annual TESOL Convention, Toronto, Canada (EDRS No. ED 227 706) (1983)
  18. Cohen, A., "Learner strategies in language learning", pp.57~69 (1987), prentice-Hall
  19. Connor, R., "Teachers’ rhetorical comments on student papers", College Composition and Communication, 44, pp.200~223 (1993)
  20. Elbow, P., "Writing without teachers" (1973), Oxford University Press
  21. Faigley, L., "Analyzing revision", College composition and communication, 32, pp.400~414 (1981)
  22. Fathman, A., "Second language writing: Research insight for the classroom", pp.178~190 (1990), Cambridge University Press
  23. Ferris, D. R., "Student reaction to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms", TESOL Quarterly, 29, pp.33~53 (1995)
  24. Ferris, D. R., "The influence of teacher commentary on student revision", TESOL Quartely, 31, pp.315~339 (1997)
  25. Hairstone, M., "Training the new teacher of college composition", pp.117~124 (1986), NCTE
  26. Hedgcock, J., "Feedback on feedback : Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, pp.1~ (1994)
  27. Hirvela, A., "Collaborative writing instruction and communication of readers and writers", TESOL Journal, 8(2), pp.7~12 (1999)
  28. Hyland, K., "Genre-based pedagogy : A social response to process", Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, pp.17~29 (2003)
  29. Jacobs, H. L., "Testing ESL composition : A practical approach" (1981), Newburry House
  30. Leki, I., "Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom", pp.57~68 (1990), Cambridge University Press
  31. Mendonca, C. O., "Peer review negotiations : Revision activities in ESL writing instruction", TESOL Quarterly, 28, pp.745~769 (1994)
  32. Mittan, R., "Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students", pp.207~219 (1989), Longman
  33. Moxley, J., "Responding to student writing: Goals, methods, alternatives", Freshman English News, 17, pp.3~4 (1989)
  34. Pathey-Chavez, G., "Writing conferences and weaving of multivoiced texts in college composition", Research in the Teaching of English, 31, pp.51~90 (1997)
  35. Reid, J., "Responding to ESL students’texts. The myths of appropriation", TESOL Quarterly, 28, pp.273~292 (1994)
  36. Saito, H., "Teacher’s practices and students’ preferences for feedback on second language writing : A case study of adult ESL learners", TESL Canada Journal, 11(2), pp.46~70 (1994)
  37. Silva, T., "Comments on vivian Zamel’s “Recent research on writing pedagogy”", TESOL Quarterly, 22, pp.517~519 (1988)
  38. Silva, T., "Toward an understanding of distinct nature of L2 writing : The ESL research and its implications", TESOL Quarterly, 27, pp.675~677 (1993)
  39. Silva, T., "On the ethical treatment of ESL writers", TESOL Quarterly, 31, pp.359~363 (1997)
  40. Sommers, N., "Responding to student writing", College Composition and Communication, 33, pp.148~156 (1982)
  41. Straub, R., "Students’ reaction to teacher comments : An exploratory study", Research in the Teaching of English, 31, pp.91~119 (1997)
  42. Zamel, V., "Writing : The process of discovering meaning", TESOL quarterly, 16, pp.195~209 (1982)
  43. Zamel, V., "Responding to student writing", TESOL Quarterly, 19, pp.79~101 (1985)
  44. Zhang, S., "Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class", Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, pp.209~222 (1995)
  45. Zhu, W., "Interaction and feedback in mixed peer response groups", Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, pp.251~276 (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (23건)