번역 감수 및 개정을 지원하는 감수항목표 제안: 실무 번역가들의 한영 번역 오류에 기반하여
A Study on Revision Rubric for Korean-English Translation based on Errors in Full-time Korean-English Translators
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The present study aims at devising an effective set of revision parameters that can be used in assessing and revising Korean-English non-literary translation works by analyzing the errors in Korean-English translations of 23 full-time translators. More specifically, the study attempts to 1) identify major errors in the Korean-English translation works of full-time translators, 2) test suitability of 'NAATI error categories' for non-literary Korean-English translation works, and 3) make necessary modifications to NAATI categories to devise the best-fitting revision rubric for Korean-English non-literary translation works. Analyses found 369 cases of errors in the translations of 23 full-time translators, of which the most frequent type was ‘grammar and syntax’(159), followed by ‘distortion’(131) and ‘punctuation’(31). Analysis of the errors against the NAATI error categories showed that some error categories of NAATI require merging and some require further segmentation. Building on the analyses, a modified version of revision rubric is presented and the limitations and implications of the findings are discussed.
Abstract
The present study aims at devising an effective set of revision parameters that can be used in assessing and revising Korean-English non-literary translation works by analyzing the errors in Korean-English translations of 23 full-time translators. More specifically, the study attempts to 1) identify major errors in the Korean-English translation works of full-time translators, 2) test suitability of 'NAATI error categories' for non-literary Korean-English translation works, and 3) make necessary modifications to NAATI categories to devise the best-fitting revision rubric for Korean-English non-literary translation works. Analyses found 369 cases of errors in the translations of 23 full-time translators, of which the most frequent type was ‘grammar and syntax’(159), followed by ‘distortion’(131) and ‘punctuation’(31). Analysis of the errors against the NAATI error categories showed that some error categories of NAATI require merging and some require further segmentation. Building on the analyses, a modified version of revision rubric is presented and the limitations and implications of the findings are discussed.
참고문헌 (16)
- 박지영, "국내 감수 실무 관행에 관한 고찰: 감수 절차 및 감수 항목을 중심으로", 번역학연구, 19(2), pp.147~173 (2018), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 박지영, "감수자 자격과 감수품질에 관한 제언: 한영번역에 대한 원어민 감수를 중심으로", 통역과 번역, 22(3), pp.1~27 (2020), 한국통역번역학회[DOI]
- 성초림, "번역 교육 현장에서의 번역물 품질 평가-한국외대 통역번역대학원 교강사 설문을 중심으로", 번역학연구, 2(2), pp.37~66 (2001)
- 신지선, "공공기관 번역현황 설문조사 결과 및 분석", 번역학연구, 8(2), pp.75~103 (2007), 한국번역학회[DOI]
- 이향, "번역물 감수(revision)의 정의", 통역과 번역, 5(1), pp.163~181 (2003), 한국통역번역학회
- 이향, "번역물 감수기준의 변천 고찰", 통역과 번역, 6(2), pp.59~80 (2004), 한국통역번역학회
- 이지은, "한영 법령번역 문제에 대한 고찰: 시행령 번역 감수 사례를 중심으로", 언어학연구, 26(1), pp.107~130 (2021), 한국언어연구학회
- 오미형, "교수자 가이드에 기반한 자기수정 사례연구", 통번역학연구, 19(4), pp.45~72 (2015), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- 이주리애, "피드백 항목에 따른 일한 번역 피드백 고찰 ― 교수자와 졸업생 평가를 중심으로 ―", 日本語敎育, (93), pp.75~92 (2020), 한국일본어교육학회[DOI]
- 정혜연, "번역의 자동평가: 기계번역 평가를 인간번역 평가에 적용해보기", 통번역학연구, 22(4), pp.265~287 (2018), 통번역연구소[DOI]
- Brunette, L., "Towards a Terminology for Translation Quality Assessment", The Translator, 6(2), pp.169~182 (2000)
- Mossop, B., "Revising and editing for translators" (2020), Routledge
- "Revision of a non-specialised translation: list of error categories for candidates" (2020)[URL]
- Hurguelin, P. A., "Pratique de la revision" (1998), Liguatech
- "2015년 11월 12일자 중앙일보 기사" (2015)[URL]
- "NAATI 홈페이지의 기관 소개 참조"[URL]