본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

포스트에디팅 측정지표를 통한 기계번역 오류 유형화 연구

Revisiting Machine Translation Error Typology through Human Post-editing

0

조회

0

다운로드

51

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류통역번역학

초록

Post-editing refers to correcting and editing machine translation results, which means its fundamentals involve revision and quality assessment. Assessing machine translation quality is a subjective process that relies on human judgment, which is inferred from complex criteria and parameters in professional quality metrics. Thus, a growing motivation started to be placed on the creation of machine translation error typology based upon theoretical reviews. This paper examines theoretical approaches on criteria of translation review, quality assessment and MT post-editing, and then discusses machine translation errors based on the criteria of form and meaning (language use). The paper also analyzes error types with high frequency in machine translation and compares them with those in human translation. The major error types observed in machine translation are accuracy (language norm) and clarity (transfer of meaning), while stylistic errors such as consistency and redundancy affects readability in human translation. In particular, morphological errors in orthography and syntactic restructuring have a negative effect on machine translation results, which is presumably incurred by the way how MT processes and retrieves language data.

Abstract

Post-editing refers to correcting and editing machine translation results, which means its fundamentals involve revision and quality assessment. Assessing machine translation quality is a subjective process that relies on human judgment, which is inferred from complex criteria and parameters in professional quality metrics. Thus, a growing motivation started to be placed on the creation of machine translation error typology based upon theoretical reviews. This paper examines theoretical approaches on criteria of translation review, quality assessment and MT post-editing, and then discusses machine translation errors based on the criteria of form and meaning (language use). The paper also analyzes error types with high frequency in machine translation and compares them with those in human translation. The major error types observed in machine translation are accuracy (language norm) and clarity (transfer of meaning), while stylistic errors such as consistency and redundancy affects readability in human translation. In particular, morphological errors in orthography and syntactic restructuring have a negative effect on machine translation results, which is presumably incurred by the way how MT processes and retrieves language data.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 김진아, "번역 품질평가에 관한 小考", 외국문학연구, (11), pp.4~124 (2002), 외국문학연구소
  2. 성초림, "번역교육 현장에서의 번역물 품질 평가", 번역학연구, 2(2), pp.37~56 (2001)
  3. 이향, "번역물 감수(revision)의 정의", 통역과 번역, 5(1), pp.163~181 (2003), 한국통역번역학회
  4. 이향, "번역물 감수와 번역교육" (2007), 한국학술정보
  5. 한국외대 통번역대학원 번역평가인증 연구팀, "번역인증제도", 2016년 한국외대 통번역연구소-국방어학원 합동 학술대회, pp.13~35 (2016)
  6. Al-Qinai, J., "Translation quality assessment. Strategies, parametres and procedures", Meta : journal des traducteurs, 2000, pp.45(3), 497~519
  7. Angelelli, C. V., "Using a rubric to assess translation ability. Testing and assessment in translation and interpreting studies", A call for dialogue between research and practice, 14, pp.13~ (2009)
  8. Arnold, D., "Machine translation: an introductory guide" (1994), Blackwell Pub
  9. Brunette, L., "Towards a terminology for translation quality assessment: A comparison of TQA practices", The Translator, 6(2), pp.169~182 (2000)
  10. Colina, S., "Translation quality evaluation : Empirical evidence for a functionalist approach", The Translator, 14(1), pp.97~134 (2008)
  11. DePalma, D. A., "Post-Edited Machine Translation Defined", Common Sense Advisory (2013)
  12. Dyson, M. C., "Toward a methodology for the evaluation of machine-assisted translation systems", Computers and translation, 2(2-3), pp.163~176 (1987)
  13. Fiederer, R., "Quality and machine translation : A realistic objective", Journal of Specialised Translation, 11, pp.52~74 (2009)
  14. Flanagan, M., "Testing post-editing guidelines : how translation trainees interpret them and how to tailor them for translator training purposes", The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 8(2), pp.257~275 (2014)
  15. Horguelin, P., "Practique de la revision", Linguatech (1998)
  16. Hutchins, W. J., "An introduction to machine translation (Vol. 362)" (1992), Academic Press
  17. "ISO 18687Translation services – Post-editing of machine translation output – Requirements" (2017)[URL]
  18. Mossop, B., "Revising and editign for translators" (2007), St. Jerome Publishing
  19. O’Brien, S., "Teaching post-editing: a proposal for course content", 6th EAMT Workshop Teaching Machine Translation, pp.99~106 (2002)
  20. Waddington, C., "Different methods of evaluating student translations: The question of validity", Meta: journal des traducteurs, 2001, pp.46(2), 311~325

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)