AB 번역에 나타나는 문법오류 유형 분석 및 번역 성취도와의 관계 연구
Analysis of Grammatical Errors in Korean-to-English Translation and its Relation to Translation Achievement
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, 27 sets of Korean-to-English translation work by undergraduate students were analyzed for grammatical errors. Errors were tallied by type and by student, from which five high-level categories of grammatical errors were defined: ‘article-bound’, ‘preposition-bound’, ‘verb-bound’, ‘other POS’, and ‘faulty sentence’. Analysis revealed a significant and strong correlation was found between translation scores and total number of grammatical errors of each student (r = .82, p < .01), indicating that the grammatical error was the single strongest factor in predicting undergraduate students’ scores on Korean-to-English translation. Then the students were divided into high and low groups. MANOVA was run between the students’ translation scores(IV) and the number of errors in each of the five high-level error categories(DVs). The result showed that the high and the low groups differed significantly on five error categories(η² = .611, p < .01). ‘Faulty sentence’ was found to have the strongest correlation with the translation scores followed by ‘preposition-bound’ and ‘verb-bound’.
Abstract
In this study, 27 sets of Korean-to-English translation work by undergraduate students were analyzed for grammatical errors. Errors were tallied by type and by student, from which five high-level categories of grammatical errors were defined: ‘article-bound’, ‘preposition-bound’, ‘verb-bound’, ‘other POS’, and ‘faulty sentence’. Analysis revealed a significant and strong correlation was found between translation scores and total number of grammatical errors of each student (r = .82, p < .01), indicating that the grammatical error was the single strongest factor in predicting undergraduate students’ scores on Korean-to-English translation. Then the students were divided into high and low groups. MANOVA was run between the students’ translation scores(IV) and the number of errors in each of the five high-level error categories(DVs). The result showed that the high and the low groups differed significantly on five error categories(η² = .611, p < .01). ‘Faulty sentence’ was found to have the strongest correlation with the translation scores followed by ‘preposition-bound’ and ‘verb-bound’.
참고문헌 (15)
- 남원준, "학부 통번역교육에 관한 일고찰 ―선행연구의 주요 논점에 관한 설문조사를 중심으로", 통번역학연구, 13(1), pp.21~51 (2009), 통번역연구소
- 박현주, "공공번역 결과물 오류 유형 분석- 공공기관 영어 웹사이트를 중심으로", 통역과 번역, 16(1), pp.51~80 (2014), 한국통역번역학회
- 이혜승, "학부 통번역 교육 현황 및 교육 방법 연구 - 토론과 논쟁 중심의 강좌 운영 사례 보고", 통번역학연구, 16(2), pp.179~198 (2012), 통번역연구소
- 조성은, "학부 통번역학과의 교육과정 연구: 재학생 대상 실태분석 중심으로", 번역학연구, 8(2), pp.163~192 (2007), 한국번역학회
- 최희섭, "“경기전” 일대 영어안내판의 오류 분석: 보물과 유형문화재를 중심으로", 번역학연구, 10(1), pp.199~224 (2009), 한국번역학회
- Brown, H. D., "Principles of language learning and teaching" (2007), Pearson Longman
- Chin, C., "Error analysis : An investigation of spoken errors of Korean EFL learners", English Teaching, 56(2), pp.97~123 (2001)
- 조효진, "English Verb Use in Korean College Students’ Essays: A Corpus-based Study", 영어교육, 67(2), pp.271~289 (2012), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
- Choi, I., "Test fairness and validity of the TEPS", Language Research, 35(4), pp.571~603 (1999)
- Corder, S. P., "Error analysis and interlanguage" (1981), Oxford University Press
- Dulay, H., "Language two" (1982), Oxford University Press
- James, C., "Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis" (1998), Longman
- Lederer, M., "The interpretive theory of translation : A brief survey", Conference Interpretation and Translation, 1, pp.15~28 (1999)
- Noh, S. K., "An analysis of errors by steady-state L2 English learners:Focused on errors of salient unnaturalness and communication breakdown", master, pp.2010
- 윤현경, "Grammar Errors in Korean EFL Learners’ TOEIC Speaking Test", 영어교육, 67(4), pp.287~309 (2012), 한국영어교육학회