당대 중국 도농관계의 변동과 농촌 탈정치화의 문제 — 허쉐펑(贺雪峰)의 도농이원구조에 대한 인식과 ‘실지청년(失地靑年)’ 문제를 중심으로
Current changes in China’s Urban-rural Relations and the Problem of Rural Depoliticization: Focusing on He Xuefeng’s Awareness of Urban-rural Dual Relations and the Problem of ‘Land Loss Youth’
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper re-analyzed the meaning of rural politics in Chinese society while summarizing the historical flow of the dual structure between urban and rural areas in modern China, as explained by He Xuefeng, a scholar representing Chinese rural sociology. China’s rural problems are closely linked to the sustainability of China’s economic system, changes in population structure, and consequent cultural diversity. In the late 1950s, the communist party created a dual system between urban and rural areas to create basic capital accumulation within the cities by moving the surplus produced in the rural area towards the cities by restricting migration through the Hukou system. However, with the reform and opening up in the 1980s, Chinese companies that became factories of the world needed a lot of labor, and the rural areas became a supplier of such labor, and this dual structure between cities and the rural regions was cracked. Based on He Xuefeng’s analysis of the relationship between urban and rural areas from exploitation to protection, this paper examines the problems of migrant workers and various phenomena related to them. Among them, the most critical problem is that farmers are increasingly disconnected from the land, unlike before. In the early stages of their urban migration, rural land served as an economic buffer for migrant workers, even if their life in the urban area failed. However, the recent generation of non-urban Hukou youth and farmers who have lost their land tend to be low-class inside the urban area. Ironically, the government’s civilization policy for farmers tends to gradually lose the land as a proper buffer zone in the event of a failure in their migration life. This paper understands that the fundamental approach to rural protection is not limited to simply preventing the indiscriminate development of rural land from the capital but to help maintain the relationship between farmers and land that has been maintained so far. To keep the sustainability of Chinese society as a whole, the Chinese government should identify the contradiction in the civilization policy for land lost farmers and need to worry about how to set their status at the legal or socio-cultural level.
Abstract
This paper re-analyzed the meaning of rural politics in Chinese society while summarizing the historical flow of the dual structure between urban and rural areas in modern China, as explained by He Xuefeng, a scholar representing Chinese rural sociology. China’s rural problems are closely linked to the sustainability of China’s economic system, changes in population structure, and consequent cultural diversity. In the late 1950s, the communist party created a dual system between urban and rural areas to create basic capital accumulation within the cities by moving the surplus produced in the rural area towards the cities by restricting migration through the Hukou system. However, with the reform and opening up in the 1980s, Chinese companies that became factories of the world needed a lot of labor, and the rural areas became a supplier of such labor, and this dual structure between cities and the rural regions was cracked. Based on He Xuefeng’s analysis of the relationship between urban and rural areas from exploitation to protection, this paper examines the problems of migrant workers and various phenomena related to them. Among them, the most critical problem is that farmers are increasingly disconnected from the land, unlike before. In the early stages of their urban migration, rural land served as an economic buffer for migrant workers, even if their life in the urban area failed. However, the recent generation of non-urban Hukou youth and farmers who have lost their land tend to be low-class inside the urban area. Ironically, the government’s civilization policy for farmers tends to gradually lose the land as a proper buffer zone in the event of a failure in their migration life. This paper understands that the fundamental approach to rural protection is not limited to simply preventing the indiscriminate development of rural land from the capital but to help maintain the relationship between farmers and land that has been maintained so far. To keep the sustainability of Chinese society as a whole, the Chinese government should identify the contradiction in the civilization policy for land lost farmers and need to worry about how to set their status at the legal or socio-cultural level.
참고문헌 (16)
- 공상철, "원테쥔의 중국 생태문명 담론에 관한 고찰", 중국문학, 101, pp.119~136 (2019), 한국중국어문학회[DOI]
- 공상철, "시진핑 체제 중국의 향촌을 둘러싼 의미망 - 원톄쥔 그룹을 중심으로", 황해문화, (여름) (2021)
- 김도경, "중국에서 새로운 담론은 어떻게 출현하는가? - 허쉐펑(賀雪峰)의 ‘토지재정’ 해석을 중심으로", 중국학논총, (48), pp.197~221 (2015), 중국학연구소[DOI]
- 김진공, "신노동자인가 신시민인가? ― 중국의 농민공 문제와 농민 시민화를 보는 관점 재검토", 중국문학, 114, pp.211~233 (2023), 한국중국어문학회[DOI]
- 박경철, "중국의 도농이원구조, 그 몬순과 갈등을 넘어 대안과 희망으로", 도시연구 : 역사⋅사회⋅문화, (19) (2018)
- 앙리 르페브르, "공간의 생산" (2011), 에코리브르 출판사
- 왕겅이, "앙리 르페브르의 정치적 공간담론을 통해본 지아장커(賈樟柯) 영화 속 공간의 정치적 함의", 아시아영화연구, 14(2), pp.67~100 (2021), 영화연구소
- 원톄쥔, "여덟 번의 위기 – 현대 중국의 경험과 도전, 1949~2009" (2016), 돌베개 출판사
- 정해영, "유예된 주거: 중국의 건설노동자와 농민공 주거의 재생산", 아시아리뷰, 13(1), pp.165~196 (2023), 아시아연구소
- 황해흠, "农民工“半城市化”困境及市民化的法规建构*", 법학연구, 29(1), pp.219~238 (2021), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 贺雪峰, "城乡关系变动與乡村振兴的阶段", 贵州社会科学, (8) (2021)
- 贺雪峰, "乡村的去政治化及其後果- 关于取消农业税後国家與农民关系的一个初步讨论", 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 14(1) (2012)
- 李斌, "城镇化进程中失地青年“偏离性”发展研究", 中国青年研究, (02) (2017)
- 汪小红, "失地农民身份认同及其分異——基于生命历程范式的解释", 中州学刊, (4) (2014)
- 曾东霞, "新型城镇化背景下失地青年後续发展研究", 中国名城, (12) (2016)
- 赵源, "城镇化背景下失地农民心理压力探析", 三门峡职业技术学院学报, 18(2) (2019)
