비용편익분석의 한계, 그리고 사법심사 -환경행정작용을 중심으로-
The Limits of Cost Benefit Analysis and the Judicial Review - focusing on environmental administrative actions-
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
환경행정분야에는 해당 행정작용(특히 재량행위)의 타당성을 입증하는 핵심적 근거로 비용편익분석결과가 널리 활용되고 있다. 본 논문에서는 비용편익분석이 실제 어떻게 수행되는지, 그리고 비용편익분석을 어떻게 수행하는 것이 타당한지, 그리고 비용편익분석이라는 방법론이 어떠한 한계점을 가지고 있는지를 환경행정에 관한 사례를 중심으로 살펴본다. 그 후 이러한 비용편익분석에 대한 이해를 바탕으로 비용편익분석과 관련한 사법심사의 여러 쟁점들을 검토한다. 특히 행정부가 행한 비용편익분석 결과물에 대해 어디까지 사법부의 통제가 미치는 것이 적절한지, 새만금 판결을 중심으로 살펴본다.
Abstract
Cost Benefit analyis has been widely used in order to demonstrate whether agency has exercised its discretion reasonably. This paper reviews the mechanism of cost benefit analyses and what is the proper way of carrying out a reliable cost benefit analysis, especially with regard to environmental regulation. Since cost benefit analysis has many shortcomings, this paper tries to articulate those points and introduce many attempts trying to overcome them. With these understanding, this paper discuss the appropriate scope of judicial review with respect to cost benefit analysis carried out by an agency. Special attention has been given to Supreme Court of Korea's Saemangeum ruling.
참고문헌 (19)
- 2008년도 정부 규제영향분석서 평가, "국회예산정책처", ~ (2009)
- 대우의 댐 건설로 고통받는 라오스, "프레시안", 2007
- 조홍식, "리스크법", 서울대학교 법학, 43(4) (2002)
- 세계댐위원회, "댐은 진정 이로운가?", ~ (2000)
- Anderson, Elizabeth, "Cost-Benefit Analysis, Safety and Environmental Quality, In Value in Ethics and Economics" (1993), Harvard University Press
- Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation, "Arrow, Kenneth", ~ (1993)
- A Contingent Valuation Study of Lost Passive Use Values Resulting From The Exxon Valdez Oil Spill-A report to the Attorney General of the State of Alaska, "Carson, Richard T", ~ (1992)
- Farber, Daniel, "Rethinking the Role of Cost-benefit Analysis", The University of Chicago Law Review, 76 (2009)
- Hausman, Daniel, "Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy and Public Policy" (2006), Cambridge University Press
- Holladay, J. Scott, "Internet Benefits: Consumer Surplus and Net Neutrality", Policy Brief, 10 (2011), Institute for Policy Integrity
- Valuing the Clean Air Act: How do we know how much clean air is worth, "Holladay, J. Scott", Institute for Policy Integrity, ~, pp.Discussion Paper No. 2011 (2011), 1
- Livermore, Michael A, "Retaking Rationality Two Years Later", Houston Law Review, 48(1) (2011)
- Morrison, Edward R, "Judicial Review of Discount Rates Used in Regulatory Cost-Benefit Analysis", The University of Chicago Law Review, 65 (1998)
- Nelkin, Dorothy, "Workers at Risk" (1984), University of Chicago Press
- Report to Congress on the Benefits and Costs of Federal Regulations and Unfunded Mandates on State, "Office of Information", Local, and Tribal Entities, ~ (2011)
- Revesz, Richard L, "Retaking Rationality: How Cost-benefit Analysis Can Better Protect the Environment and Our Health" (2008), Oxford University Press
- Sunstein, Cass, "Cost-Benefit Default Principle", Michigan Law Review, 99 (2000)
- U.S. EPA, "The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act from 1990 to 2020", ~ (2011)
- Ex-post estimates of costs to business of EU environmental policies, a case study looking at Ozone Depleting Substances, "Vanner, Robin", Policy Studies Institute, ~ (2006)