아동⋅청소년이 제작한 음란물에 관한 형사법적 검토– 미국과의 비교를 중심으로 –
A Review on Self-Produced Child Pornography – In comparison with the cases of the United States –
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
With the rapid change in culture and the perception of sex in our society, and the routine access to social networking services made possible due to the internet and smartphones, we get to face the unexpected challenge of self-produced child pornography. This requires that we consider whether minors who have been assumed as object of protection and potential victims under the 『Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse』 can turn voluntary offenders. In the United States, as minors' production, distribution and possession of pornographic materials such as sexting and self-produced pornographic videos became a social issue, there have been continuing debates on whether they should be punished under the law regarding child pornography. Meanwhile, reflections on the purpose of the law regarding child pornography and the basic direction of juvenile justice policies were followed. In several states, they worked on the additional legislation to distinguish self-produced child pornography from child pornography. In Korea a legal theory maintaining the reduction of idea of 'child pornography' and the recent opinion of the Supreme Court presenting justifications of illegality regarding this all show the attempts not to apply the act to the cases of self-production of child pornography. This happens because the statute currently imposes same strict legal penalties for all child pornography cases. In this article, therefore, it is thought to be required a series of legislative measures of classifying child pornography crimes into three types: production with coercion, production for profit and production for amusement or private collection. For the first two types legal penalties will need to be graded while the third type be decriminalized under the condition of offender's taking an educational program.
Abstract
With the rapid change in culture and the perception of sex in our society, and the routine access to social networking services made possible due to the internet and smartphones, we get to face the unexpected challenge of self-produced child pornography. This requires that we consider whether minors who have been assumed as object of protection and potential victims under the 『Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse』 can turn voluntary offenders. In the United States, as minors' production, distribution and possession of pornographic materials such as sexting and self-produced pornographic videos became a social issue, there have been continuing debates on whether they should be punished under the law regarding child pornography. Meanwhile, reflections on the purpose of the law regarding child pornography and the basic direction of juvenile justice policies were followed. In several states, they worked on the additional legislation to distinguish self-produced child pornography from child pornography. In Korea a legal theory maintaining the reduction of idea of 'child pornography' and the recent opinion of the Supreme Court presenting justifications of illegality regarding this all show the attempts not to apply the act to the cases of self-production of child pornography. This happens because the statute currently imposes same strict legal penalties for all child pornography cases. In this article, therefore, it is thought to be required a series of legislative measures of classifying child pornography crimes into three types: production with coercion, production for profit and production for amusement or private collection. For the first two types legal penalties will need to be graded while the third type be decriminalized under the condition of offender's taking an educational program.
참고문헌 (29)
- 김두상, "아동청소년이용음란물의 단순소지 처벌에 관한 비판적 고찰", 서울법학, 21(1), pp.135~166 (2013), 서울시립대학교 법학연구소
- 김성규, "아동ㆍ청소년이용음란물의 단순소지자에 대한 규제의 현상과 방향성", 미국헌법연구, 24(1), pp.67~96 (2013), 미국헌법학회
- 김슬기, "인터넷상 아동・청소년 이용 음란물 소지의 개념에 관한 검토 - 미국과의 비교를 중심으로 -", 과학기술법연구, 18(3), pp.301~328 (2012), 과학기술법연구원
- 박경신, "가상아동포르노그래피 규제의 위헌성", 법학연구, 21(2), pp.181~210 (2013), 법학연구소
- 박상기, "형법학(제2판)" (2015), 집현재
- 박용철, "아동ㆍ청소년이용음란물의 범위에 대하여", 강원법학, 43, pp.237~268 (2014), 비교법학연구소
- 박찬걸, "아동· 청소년이용음란물소지죄의 해석론 및 입법론에 대한 검토", 형사정책, 25(2), pp.269~301 (2013), 한국형사정책학회
- 송문호, "아청법상 음란물소지죄의 제한적 적용가능성", 법학연구, 22(1), pp.337~353 (2014), 법학연구소
- 송문호, "가상(假想)음란물과 아청법", 법학논집, 18(1), pp.217~234 (2013), 법학연구소
- 안경옥, "독일 아동·청소년 이용 음란물 규정 및 처벌범위에 대한 비교법적 검토", 법학논총, 31(4), pp.143~166 (2014), 법학연구소
- 이건호, "아동･청소년이용음란물의 범죄구성요건에 대한 검토", 형사정책연구, 26(1), pp.5~28 (2015), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이정원, "형법총론" (2012), 신론사
- 임정호, "아동·청소년의 성보호에 관한 법률상 아동음란물 정의규정에 대한 미국법과의 비교 연구", 법학논총, 25(3), pp.9~33 (2013), 법학연구소
- 통계청, "2015 청소년 통계 보도자료", 보도자료, 2015.4.28, ~ (2015)
- "아동음란물 10만건 적발, 초등학생도 33명이나...,2014.10.30.사회면" (2014), 동아닷컴[URL]
- "19세여고생 "벗은 셀카 줄게요, 문화상품권 주세요", 2014.4.8. 사회면" (2014), 머니투데이[URL]
- 우석환, "아동⋅청소년이용음란물 제작죄의 의미와 위법성조각사유", 법률신문, 2015.5.14, ~ (2015)
- Amy F. Kimpel, "Using Laws Designed to Protect as a Weapon : Prosecuting Minors under Child Pornography Laws", N.Y.U. Review of Law & Social Change, 34 (2010)
- Clay Calvert, "Sex, Cell Phones, Privacy, and the First Amendment: When Children Become Child Pornographers and the Lolita Effect Undermines the Law", CommLaw Conspectus, 18, pp.1~ (2009)
- Karen Terry, "Sexual Offenses and Offenders: Theory, Practice, and Policy" (2013), Wadsworth
- Mary Graw Leary, "Sexting or Self-Produced Child Pornography? The Dialog Continues –Structured Prosecutorial Discretion Within a Multidisciplinary Respose", Virginia journal of Social Policy & the Law, 17 (2010)
- Sarah Thompson, "Sexting Prosecutions : Minors as a Protected Class From Child Pornography Charges", University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 48 (2014)
- Sarah Wastler, "The Harm in ”Sexting“? : Analyzing the Constitutionality of Child Pornography Statutes that Prohibit the Voluntary Production, Possession, and Dissemination of Sexually Explicit Image by Teenagers", Harvard Journal of Law & Gender, 33 (2010)
- Stephen F. Smith, "Jail for Juvenile Child Pornographers? : A Reply to Professor Leary", Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law, 15 (2008)
- Susan Hanley Duncan, "A Legal Response Is Necessary for Self-Produced Child Pornography : A Legislator’s Checklist for Drafting the Bill", Oregon Law Review, 89 (2010)
- "Sexting Leads to Child Porn Charges for Teens, CBS NEWS (July 7, 2010,)" (2010)[URL]
- "Citizen’s Guide to U.S. Federal Law on Child Pornofraphy"[URL]
- "Sexting May Spell Court for Children, CHI. TRIB. (Jan. 29, 2010)" (2010)[URL]
- "A Brief Review of State Sexting Laws and Policies (2015.7)" (2015)[URL]