독일 아동·청소년 이용 음란물 규정 및 처벌범위에 대한 비교법적 검토
Study on provisions and penalty of pornography films of sexual abuse of children by comparing German and Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The need for punishing acts such as producing or distributing a pornography filmof sexual abuse of children is to protecting children and adolescents as well as topreventing sexual violence and crime. Because they are experiencing sexual abuseor exploitation the process of making pornography. In addition, it is also necessary to review of Punishment and crime'srequirements for cyber pornography or expression in cyber because it is sharplyincreasing to disseminate or possess pornography on the internet. I have reviewed previous discussions related to the punishment of pornography inwhich children and adolescents appear, several issues about the punishment wereraised. This paper aims to compare the regulations about child and adolescentpornography of Korea and Germany and suggest the improvement of the mainissues. Obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children shall not besubject to punish because it does not directly give children or adolescent damagecaused by the sexual abuse or exploitation. Since possession of child pornography is not a direct sexual offense ispunishable, just it is in the preliminary stages. So we carefully consider the needof punishment. And it is necessary to examine the balance of penalty by comparingother pornography crime. In addition to, it is need to regulate requirements of crime and sentencesdifferently to distinguish between children and adolescentsIt is much severe crime to make or distribute a pornography films of sexualabuse of children in order to make a money or cooperate with some people. so itdeserves to give heavy punishment.
Abstract
The need for punishing acts such as producing or distributing a pornography filmof sexual abuse of children is to protecting children and adolescents as well as topreventing sexual violence and crime. Because they are experiencing sexual abuseor exploitation the process of making pornography. In addition, it is also necessary to review of Punishment and crime'srequirements for cyber pornography or expression in cyber because it is sharplyincreasing to disseminate or possess pornography on the internet. I have reviewed previous discussions related to the punishment of pornography inwhich children and adolescents appear, several issues about the punishment wereraised. This paper aims to compare the regulations about child and adolescentpornography of Korea and Germany and suggest the improvement of the mainissues. Obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children shall not besubject to punish because it does not directly give children or adolescent damagecaused by the sexual abuse or exploitation. Since possession of child pornography is not a direct sexual offense ispunishable, just it is in the preliminary stages. So we carefully consider the needof punishment. And it is necessary to examine the balance of penalty by comparingother pornography crime. In addition to, it is need to regulate requirements of crime and sentencesdifferently to distinguish between children and adolescentsIt is much severe crime to make or distribute a pornography films of sexualabuse of children in order to make a money or cooperate with some people. so itdeserves to give heavy punishment.
참고문헌 (23)
- 김두상, "아동청소년이용음란물의 단순소지 처벌에 관한 비판적 고찰", 서울법학, 21(1), pp.135~166 (2013), 서울시립대학교 법학연구소
- 김성규, "아동ㆍ청소년이용음란물의 단순소지자에 대한 규제의 현상과 방향성", 미국헌법연구, 24(1), pp.67~96 (2013), 미국헌법학회
- 김슬기, "인터넷상 아동・청소년 이용 음란물 소지의 개념에 관한 검토 - 미국과의 비교를 중심으로 -", 과학기술법연구, 18(3), pp.301~328 (2012), 과학기술법연구원
- 김용화, "아동포르노 근절에 관한 연구", 영남법학, (31), pp.393~421 (2010), 법학연구소
- 김은관, "아동음란물 규제의 적법성 고찰", 아주법학, 6(2), pp.333~361 (2012), 법학연구소
- 박찬걸, "아동· 청소년이용음란물소지죄의 해석론 및 입법론에 대한 검토", 형사정책, 25(2), pp.269~301 (2013), 한국형사정책학회
- 송문호, "가상(假想)음란물과 아청법", 법학논집, 18(1), pp.217~234 (2013), 법학연구소
- 아동음란물과 성범죄의 상관관계 연구, "윤진숙", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2012)
- 이원상, "아동포르노그래피 소지죄에 대한 온라인 서비스제공자의 형사책임에 관한 연구", 안암법학, (35), pp.115~141 (2011), 안암법학회
- 이주원, "특별형법" (2014), 홍문사
- 임정호, "아동·청소년의 성보호에 관한 법률상 아동음란물 정의규정에 대한 미국법과의 비교 연구", 법학논총, 25(3), pp.9~33 (2013), 법학연구소
- Eckstein, "Grundlagen und aktuelle Probleme der Besitzdelikte - EDV, EU, Strafrechtsänderungsgesetze, Konkurrenzen", ZStW, 117
- Frommel, "StGB" (2013)
- Graf, "BGH-Rechtsprechungstrafrecht 2012", 13, 2013
- Harms, "Ist das “bloße” Anschauen von kinderpornographischen Bildern im Internet nach geltendem Recht strafbar ?", NStZ, 03, pp.650~
- M. Heinrich, "Neue Medien und klassisches Strafrecht - §184b IV StGB im Lichte der Internetdelinquenz", NStZ, 05, pp.364~
- Hörnle, "Umsetzung des Rahmenbeschlusses zur Bekämpfung der sexuellen Ausbeutung von Kindern und der Kinderporografie", NJW, 08, pp.3524~
- Mitsch, "Fehlvorstellungen über das Alter der Darsteller bei Kinder- und Jugendpornografie, §§184b, c StGB", ZStW, 124, pp.32~
- Scheffler, "Zur Strafbarkeit des Betrachtens kinderpornografischer Inernet Seiten aud dem PC", pp.627~, Herzberg-FS
- Schönke, "StGB" (2014)
- F.C.Schroeder, "Gesetzestechnische Mängel im Gesetz zur Umsetzung des EU-Rahmenbeschlusses zur Bekämpfung der sexuellen Ausbeutung von Kindern und der Kinderpornografie", GA, 9, pp.218~