본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of cyclic fatigue life of nickel-titanium files: an examination using high-speed camera

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Objectives: To determine the actual revolutions per minute (rpm) values and compare the cyclic fatigue life of Reciproc (RPC, VDW GmbH), WaveOne (WO, Dentsply Maillefer), and TF Adaptive (TFA, Axis/SybronEndo) nickel-titanium (NiTi) file systems using high-speed camera. Materials and Methods: Twenty RPC R25 (25/0.08), 20 WO Primary (25/0.08), and 20 TFA ML 1 (25/0.08) files were employed in the present study. The cyclic fatigue tests were performed using a dynamic cyclic fatigue testing device, which has an artificial stainless steel canal with a 60° angle of curvature and a 5-mm radius of curvature. The files were divided into 3 groups (group 1, RPC R25 [RPC]; group 2, WO Primary [WO]; group 3, TF Adaptive ML 1 [TFA]). All the instruments were rotated until fracture during the cyclic fatigue test and slow-motion videos were captured using high-speed camera. The number of cycles to failure (NCF) was calculated. The data were analyzed statistically using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA, p < 0.05). Results: The slow-motion videos were indicated that rpm values of the RPC, WO, and TFA groups were 180, 210, and 425, respectively. RPC (3,464.45 ± 487.58) and WO (3,257.63 ± 556.39) groups had significantly longer cyclic fatigue life compared with TFA (1,634.46 ± 300.03) group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the mean length of the fractured fragments. Conclusions: Within the limitation of the present study, RPC and WO NiTi files showed significantly longer cyclic fatigue life than TFA NiTi file.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the actual revolutions per minute (rpm) values and compare the cyclic fatigue life of Reciproc (RPC, VDW GmbH), WaveOne (WO, Dentsply Maillefer), and TF Adaptive (TFA, Axis/SybronEndo) nickel-titanium (NiTi) file systems using high-speed camera. Materials and Methods: Twenty RPC R25 (25/0.08), 20 WO Primary (25/0.08), and 20 TFA ML 1 (25/0.08) files were employed in the present study. The cyclic fatigue tests were performed using a dynamic cyclic fatigue testing device, which has an artificial stainless steel canal with a 60° angle of curvature and a 5-mm radius of curvature. The files were divided into 3 groups (group 1, RPC R25 [RPC]; group 2, WO Primary [WO]; group 3, TF Adaptive ML 1 [TFA]). All the instruments were rotated until fracture during the cyclic fatigue test and slow-motion videos were captured using high-speed camera. The number of cycles to failure (NCF) was calculated. The data were analyzed statistically using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA, p < 0.05). Results: The slow-motion videos were indicated that rpm values of the RPC, WO, and TFA groups were 180, 210, and 425, respectively. RPC (3,464.45 ± 487.58) and WO (3,257.63 ± 556.39) groups had significantly longer cyclic fatigue life compared with TFA (1,634.46 ± 300.03) group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the mean length of the fractured fragments. Conclusions: Within the limitation of the present study, RPC and WO NiTi files showed significantly longer cyclic fatigue life than TFA NiTi file.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Parashos P, "Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences", J Endod, 32, pp.1031~1043 (2006)
  2. Sattapan B, "Defects in rotary nickel-titanium files after clinical use", J Endod, 26, pp.161~165 (2000)
  3. Wei X, "Modes of failure of ProTaper nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use", J Endod, 33, pp.276~279 (2007)
  4. Thompson SA, "An overview of nickel-titanium alloys used in dentistry", Int Endod J, 33, pp.297~310 (2000)
  5. Cheung GS, "Instrument fracture: mechanisms, removal of fragments, and clinical outcomes", Endod Topics, 16, pp.1~26 (2007)
  6. Martín B, "Factors influencing the fracture of nickel-titanium rotary instruments", Int Endod J, 36, pp.262~266 (2003)
  7. Pruett JP, "Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments", J Endod, 23, pp.77~85 (1997)
  8. Yared GM, "Cyclic fatigue of ProFile rotary instruments after clinical use", Int Endod J, 33, pp.204~207 (2000)
  9. Ferreira F, "Movement kinematics and cyclic fatigue of NiTi rotary instruments: a systematic review", Int Endod J, 50, pp.143~152 (2017)
  10. Yared G, "Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations", Int Endod J, 41, pp.339~344 (2008)
  11. Ahn SY, "Kinematic effects of nickel-titanium instruments with reciprocating or continuous rotation motion: a systematic review of in vitro studies", J Endod, 42, pp.1009~1017 (2016)
  12. You SY, "Lifespan of one nickel-titanium rotary file with reciprocating motion in curved root canals", J Endod, 36, pp.1991~1994 (2010)
  13. Pedullà E, "Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of 4 different nickel-titanium rotary instruments", J Endod, 39, pp.258~261 (2013)
  14. "TF™ Adaptive"[URL]
  15. Taha Özyürek, "Effect of adaptive motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of a nickel titanium instrument designed for retreatment", Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, 42(1), pp.34~38 (2017), 대한치과보존학회
  16. Keskin B, "The effects of adaptive motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of twisted files", J Dent Appl, 3, pp.337~339 (2016)
  17. Gambarini G, "Influence of different angles of reciprocation on the cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments", J Endod, 38, pp.1408~1411 (2012)
  18. Shin CS, "Fatigue life enhancement of NiTi rotary endodontic instruments by progressive reciprocating operation", Int Endod J, 47, pp.882~888 (2014)
  19. Arslan H, "Cyclic fatigue analysis of Reciproc R25® instruments with different kinematics", Aust Endod J, 42, pp.22~24 (2016)
  20. Plotino G, "Cyclic fatigue of Reciproc and WaveOne reciprocating instruments", Int Endod J, 45, pp.614~618 (2012)
  21. da Frota MF, "Comparison of cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance in reciprocating single-file systems and continuous rotary instrumentation systems", J Oral Sci, 56, pp.269~275 (2014)
  22. Scelza P, "A comparison of two reciprocating instruments using bending stress and cyclic fatigue tests", Braz Oral Res, 29, pp.1~7 (2015)
  23. De-Deus G, "Bending resistance and dynamic and static cyclic fatigue life of Reciproc and WaveOne large instruments", J Endod, 40, pp.575~579 (2014)
  24. Higuera O, "Cyclic fatigue resistance of 3 different nickel-titanium reciprocating instruments in artificial canals", J Endod, 41, pp.913~915 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

Effect of adaptive motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of a nickel titanium instrument designed for retreatmentKoray Yılmaz and Gülşah Uslu, Taha Özyürek대한치과보존학회 · Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics2017 · 제42권 제1호Cyclic fatigue life of Tango-Endo, WaveOne GOLD, and Reciproc NiTi instrumentsKoray Yılmaz, Taha Özyürek대한치과보존학회 · Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics2017 · 제42권 제2호EFFECT OF CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA OF 6 NICKEL-TITANIUM ROTARY INSTRUMENTS ON THE FATIGUE FRACTURE UNDER CYCLIC FLEXURAL STRESS: A FRACTOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS이윤, 금기연, 오소람, 임상민, 황수연대한치과보존학회 · Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics2009 · 제34권 제5호Cyclic fatigue resistance of M-Pro and RaCe Ni-Ti rotary endodontic instruments in artificial curved canals: a comparative in vitro studyHadeer Mostafa El Feky, Khalid Mohammed Ezzat, Marwa Mahmoud Ali Bedier대한치과보존학회 · Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics2019 · 제44권 제4호Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of VDW.ROTATE, TruNatomy, 2Shape, and HyFlex CM nickel-titanium rotary files at body temperatureGündoğar Mustafa, Özyürek Taha, Plotino Gianluca, Uslu Gülşah대한치과보존학회 · Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics2020 · 제45권 제3호Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of One Curve, F6 Skytaper, Protaper Next, and Hyflex CM endodontic filesArbab-Chirani Reza, Arbab-Chirani Shabnam, Chevalier Valérie, Gouédard Charlotte, Pino Laurent대한치과보존학회 · Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics2022 · 제47권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)