언어 바깥의 언어 ― 한사오궁의 「아빠, 빠, 빠」 재독
Words outside Language
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the post-Mao China, ‘Root Seeking Literature’ emerged as an antinomical project: on the one hand it had to demolish the old fort of Cultural Revolution, while procreate new cultural subject from the bottom of the fort, on the other hand. Han Shaogong's stories and novellas produced in this period teem with schizophrenic symptoms, with positive and negative narrative entangled each other, which is caused by the dilemma of the 'Root Seeking' project. Concerning this dilemma, I explored the equivocality of the subject in “Pa, Pa, Pa”, especially focusing on the issue of language. The main argument of this article unfolds through my critical reading of Rong Cai's analysis of “Pa, Pa, Pa”. She, employing Lacan's language theory, insists that the lack of voice ultimately denies Bing Zai passage into the Symbolic, which consequently equals a denial of subjectivity. In my vies, however, she failed to notice the split of subjectivity in Lacan's theory. In other words, although a subject is able to acquire the subjectivity by entering the language order of the Symbolic, at the very moment it loses its own being because it is to be subjected to the language system of the Symbolic. Here comes the paradox that the speaking subject is also the spoken subject. Subject is schizophrenic, split up from its own being. More important thing is that the pre-verbal or pre-Symbolic stage is not likely a pejorative term in Han's works. To the contrary, he warns that once the relation between the words and the meaning becomes rigid and inflexible, frenzy is prone to occur, which is the salient sign in the age of civilization. For him, the pre-verbal language is the repository in which the divine nature of words before its degeneration is cherished. It is the departure spot where Han's writing began. Disturbing the stiff relation between the signifier and the signified embedded in the normal language, and seizing a glimmer of words from the crack: this is the long literary design Han shaogong has projected. “Pa, Pa, Pa” keeps the despair in the era when the sacred light disappeared, and the desperation for grabbing the faint memory for it. Bing Zai is not only a symbol of the decline of language, but also a cryptic evidence of the pre-verbal words. And, it is the profound water vein, that is, the root of culture which Han wanted to search for.
Abstract
In the post-Mao China, ‘Root Seeking Literature’ emerged as an antinomical project: on the one hand it had to demolish the old fort of Cultural Revolution, while procreate new cultural subject from the bottom of the fort, on the other hand. Han Shaogong's stories and novellas produced in this period teem with schizophrenic symptoms, with positive and negative narrative entangled each other, which is caused by the dilemma of the 'Root Seeking' project. Concerning this dilemma, I explored the equivocality of the subject in “Pa, Pa, Pa”, especially focusing on the issue of language. The main argument of this article unfolds through my critical reading of Rong Cai's analysis of “Pa, Pa, Pa”. She, employing Lacan's language theory, insists that the lack of voice ultimately denies Bing Zai passage into the Symbolic, which consequently equals a denial of subjectivity. In my vies, however, she failed to notice the split of subjectivity in Lacan's theory. In other words, although a subject is able to acquire the subjectivity by entering the language order of the Symbolic, at the very moment it loses its own being because it is to be subjected to the language system of the Symbolic. Here comes the paradox that the speaking subject is also the spoken subject. Subject is schizophrenic, split up from its own being. More important thing is that the pre-verbal or pre-Symbolic stage is not likely a pejorative term in Han's works. To the contrary, he warns that once the relation between the words and the meaning becomes rigid and inflexible, frenzy is prone to occur, which is the salient sign in the age of civilization. For him, the pre-verbal language is the repository in which the divine nature of words before its degeneration is cherished. It is the departure spot where Han's writing began. Disturbing the stiff relation between the signifier and the signified embedded in the normal language, and seizing a glimmer of words from the crack: this is the long literary design Han shaogong has projected. “Pa, Pa, Pa” keeps the despair in the era when the sacred light disappeared, and the desperation for grabbing the faint memory for it. Bing Zai is not only a symbol of the decline of language, but also a cryptic evidence of the pre-verbal words. And, it is the profound water vein, that is, the root of culture which Han wanted to search for.
참고문헌 (20)
- 蔡翔, "韓少功代表作 藍蓋子" (2002), 春風文藝出版社
- 韓少功, "馬橋詞典" (2004), 人民文學出版社
- 韓少功, "閱讀的年輪" (2004), 九州出版社
- 劉再復, "論丙崽", 光明日報, ~ (1988)
- Joseph S. M. Lau, "Visitation of the Past in Han Shaogong's Post-1985 Fictions in From May Fourth to June Fourth: Fiction and Film in Twentieth-century China," (1993), Harvard University Press
- 陳曉明, "個人記憶與歷史布景 ― 關于韓少功和尋根的斷想", 文藝爭鳴, 5 (1994)
- 백지운, "탈이데올로기시대 문학의 탈근대성", 문학수첩, (봄) (2006)
- Han Shaogong, "Why Did the Cultural Revolution End", Boundary 2, 35(2) (2008)
- Helmut Martin, "Modern Chinese Writers: Self-portrayals" (1992), M. E. Sharpe, Inc
- 정재서, "산해경" (1996), 민음사
- Dylan Evans, "라깡 정신분석 사전", 인간사랑 (1998)
- 전인초, "중국신화의 이해" (2002), 아카넷
- 맹정현, "라깡의 재탄생" (2002), 창작과비평사
- Rong Cai, "The Subject in Crisis in Contemporary Chinese Literature" (2004), University of Hawai'i Press
- 吳義勤, "韓少功硏究資料" (2006), 山東文藝出版社
- 백지운, "열렬한 책읽기" (2008), 청어람미디어
- 이욱연, "포스트사회주의 시대의 중국 문화" (2009), 서강대학교출판부
- 司馬遷, "완역 사기 본기(1)" (2010), 알마
- "文學: 無能的能量如何可能? ― ‘文學這30年’三人談"[URL]
