韓少功 소설을 통해 본 예술적 의미로서의 현대성 고찰 -소설 『爸爸爸』와『女女女』를 중심으로 -
A Study on the Modernity of Artistic Meaning through Han Shao Gong’s novels - Focusing on the 『爸爸爸』and 『女女女』 -
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to examine the characteristics of ‘modernity’ demonstrated in Han Shao Gong’s novel 『爸爸爸』 (1985) and 『女女女』 (1986) from an artistic perspective. As Han Shao Gong’s novels achieved the name of novel with philosophical principles, his works have been studied with the thesis of ‘philosophical thinking.’ However, there have been limitations in explaining his literary world solely with philosophical thinking as his works are of explorations with literature, history and philosophy integrated. As to theory of art, an art historian Jo Junggeol (2012) stated “Modernism mentioned on philosophy refers to modern philosophical ideologies and it is a notion of common noun. Modernism in art, however, is used as a stylistic name like terms such as romanticism, realism and impressionism.” In other words, he regarded modernity in art as something that should be distinctive from a common noun. Starting from the aforementioned issues, this paper is to distinguish the two novels in perspective of art theory and to discuss styles applicable on them. First, this paper suggests ‘superficiality’ of modernism, ‘parody’ and ‘representation’ of neorealism and ‘coincidence’ demonstrated on existentialism as characteristics of ‘modernity.’ Those modernity characteristics shown on Han Shao Gong’s novel were to express ‘how’ instead of ‘what’ Literary expressions embodied by Han Shao Gong were the results from actively embracing Chinese contemporary literature and public demands.
Abstract
This paper aims to examine the characteristics of ‘modernity’ demonstrated in Han Shao Gong’s novel 『爸爸爸』 (1985) and 『女女女』 (1986) from an artistic perspective. As Han Shao Gong’s novels achieved the name of novel with philosophical principles, his works have been studied with the thesis of ‘philosophical thinking.’ However, there have been limitations in explaining his literary world solely with philosophical thinking as his works are of explorations with literature, history and philosophy integrated. As to theory of art, an art historian Jo Junggeol (2012) stated “Modernism mentioned on philosophy refers to modern philosophical ideologies and it is a notion of common noun. Modernism in art, however, is used as a stylistic name like terms such as romanticism, realism and impressionism.” In other words, he regarded modernity in art as something that should be distinctive from a common noun. Starting from the aforementioned issues, this paper is to distinguish the two novels in perspective of art theory and to discuss styles applicable on them. First, this paper suggests ‘superficiality’ of modernism, ‘parody’ and ‘representation’ of neorealism and ‘coincidence’ demonstrated on existentialism as characteristics of ‘modernity.’ Those modernity characteristics shown on Han Shao Gong’s novel were to express ‘how’ instead of ‘what’ Literary expressions embodied by Han Shao Gong were the results from actively embracing Chinese contemporary literature and public demands.
참고문헌 (35)
- 韩少功, "爸爸爸", 人民文学, (6) (1985)
- 韩少功, "女女女", 上海文学, (5) (1986)
- 韩少功, "完美的假定", 天涯, (1) (1996)
- 韩少功, "熟悉的陌生人", 天涯, (3) (1998)
- 韩少功, "韩少功自选集" (2004), 海南出版社
- 韩少功, "报告政府" (2008), 人民文学出版社
- 韩少功, "歷史:现在与过去的双向激活", 小说界 (2004)
- 楊義, "中國現代小說史 卷1" (1986), 人民文學出版社
- 吴义勤, "韩少功硏究资料" (2006), 山東文藝出版社
- 孔见, "韩少功评传" (2008), 河南文艺出版社
- 조중걸, "현대예술" (2012), 지혜정원
- 韓少功, "열렬한 책읽기" (2008), 청어람미디어
- 陳思和, "중국당대문학사" (2008), 문학동네
- 巫鸿, "작품과 전시-중국현대미술의 조류" (2005), 문사철
- 조셉 켐벨, "천의 얼굴을 가진 영웅" (1999), 민음사
- 울리히 벡, "아름답고 새로운 노동세계" (1999), 생각의 나무
- 林志煌, "論韓少功小說散文化傾向", 碩士, pp.2012
- 謝雪花, "身份認同和審美現代性阐釋視野中的80年代小說", 博士, pp.2009
- 方秀珍, "神秘主义, 祛魅与復魅", 博士, pp.2008
- 刘现法, "1985年寻根文学与拉美魔幻现实主义", 硕士, pp.2008
- 曾利君, "魔幻现实主义与中国当代文学", 博士, pp.2005
- 정미연, "한소공 소설 연구 : 1985년 작품들을 중심으로", 석사, 중어중문학, pp.2001
- 刁晓宇, "『爸爸爸』中魔幻现实主义色彩的分析", 名作欣赏 (2016), 北京外国语大学外国文学硏究所
- 基亮, "严峻深沉的文化反思-浅谈韩少功的中篇「爸爸爸」及當前的“文化热”流", 當代文坛, (10) (1985)
- 董之林, "镜子与调色板-重读『女女女』", 文艺争鸣, (5) (1994)
- 南帆, "歷史的警觉-读韩少功1985年之后作品", 當代作家评论, (6) (1994)
- 胡宗健, "韩少功近作叁思", 文学评论, (2) (1987)
- 陈剑晖, "智慧的独语-关于韩少功随笔的札记", 當代作家评论, (6) (1994)
- 刘再复, "论丙崽", 光明日报 1988年11月4日, ~ (1988)
- 玛莎, "韩少功硏究资料" (2006), 山東文藝出版社
- 백지운, "언어 바깥의 언어 ― 한사오궁의 「아빠, 빠, 빠」 재독", 중국현대문학, (57), pp.333~356 (2011), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 홍우람, "칸트의 비판철학과 선험적 대상: 선험적 대상의 세 가지 의미", 칸트연구, (39), pp.1~35 (2017), 한국칸트학회
- "패러디(parody)"[URL]
- "부조리", 알베르%20카뮈[URL]
- "기표와 기의"[URL]
