본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

東西의 소설 《언어 없는 생활》 속 발화양상과 의미

Utterance aspects and meaning of the novel in Dongsi's《The life of no language》

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

The purpose of this thesis is to determine the utterance aspects and meaning of the novel in Dongsi's 《The life of no language》. The three main characters in this works can not see, can not speak and can't hear, respectively. Due to these deficiencies, they are uncomfortable with communicating with others. Language functions as a kind of power in the village, and those who do not have a ‘standard’ language are pushed out of power. Because they do not have a language, they suffer destruction and violence from the villagers. And those with deficits regard their violence as their own deprivation and internalize and customize it. This vicious cycle sees those with a deficit as a ‘worthless and needy being’, justifying the destruction against them and forcing silence. Their utterance has no meaning or effect in the public language world. In that sense, their escape is read as a hoping for human life and resistance to the forced silence of the public language world. And this is proof of the fact that they are questioning their own situation and situation. Nonetheless, the violence of the public language world continued, but they oppose the‘trinity’way of filling each other’s deficits. Through them, their utterance for finding the status and power of their lives regains the full meaning of speaking and acting for the first time. But Shengri(勝利) is taken away from the language of the public language world. This means that their escape is ended in failure by adding a social environment that prevents them from talking about their functional deficits. This novels are a record of and a failure to resist how a living being outside a community survives.

Abstract

The purpose of this thesis is to determine the utterance aspects and meaning of the novel in Dongsi's 《The life of no language》. The three main characters in this works can not see, can not speak and can't hear, respectively. Due to these deficiencies, they are uncomfortable with communicating with others. Language functions as a kind of power in the village, and those who do not have a ‘standard’ language are pushed out of power. Because they do not have a language, they suffer destruction and violence from the villagers. And those with deficits regard their violence as their own deprivation and internalize and customize it. This vicious cycle sees those with a deficit as a ‘worthless and needy being’, justifying the destruction against them and forcing silence. Their utterance has no meaning or effect in the public language world. In that sense, their escape is read as a hoping for human life and resistance to the forced silence of the public language world. And this is proof of the fact that they are questioning their own situation and situation. Nonetheless, the violence of the public language world continued, but they oppose the‘trinity’way of filling each other’s deficits. Through them, their utterance for finding the status and power of their lives regains the full meaning of speaking and acting for the first time. But Shengri(勝利) is taken away from the language of the public language world. This means that their escape is ended in failure by adding a social environment that prevents them from talking about their functional deficits. This novels are a record of and a failure to resist how a living being outside a community survives.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 김우룡, "비언어적 커뮤니케이션론" (2004), 나남출판
  2. 둥시, "언어 없는 생활" (2008), 은행나무
  3. 박은혜, "둥시(東西) 장편소설 연구 : 『따귀소리(耳光響亮)』와 『후회록』을 중심으로", 석사, 중국문학, pp.2011
  4. Roy M. Berko, "언어 커뮤니케이션" (2003), 한국문화사
  5. 柳鐵南, "冷峻的文本和深刻的疼痛―東西《沒有言語的生活》對失語狀態的後現代表達", 新鄕學院學報, 23(5) (2009)
  6. 歐陽欽, "“東拉西址的先鋒性”―《沒有言語的生活》爲例解讀東西小說的創作風格", 廣西民族師範學院學報, 28(2) (2011)
  7. 고선희, "드라마 <뿌리 깊은 나무>의 판타지성과 하위주체 발화 양상", 국제어문, (55), pp.75~115 (2012), 국제어문학회
  8. 김경남, "둥시(東西) 소설론", 외국문학연구, (38), pp.55~76 (2010), 외국문학연구소
  9. 김기택, "현대시의 내적 발화 연구", 국제한인문학연구, 1(1), pp.5~41 (2015), 국제한인문학회
  10. 김애령, "다른 목소리 듣기: 말하는 주체와 들리지 않는 이방성", 한국여성철학, 17, pp.35~60 (2012), 한국여성철학회
  11. 안인숙, "비언어적 의사소통의 의미강화 양상 연구", 국어문학, 54(54), pp.51~75 (2013), 국어문학회
  12. 윤은주, "정치적 행위와 서발턴의 유목적 정체성", 사회와 철학, (33), pp.81~104 (2017), 한국사회와철학연구회
  13. 이영구, "둥시 단편소설의 하층 민간서사 연구 -「언어 없는 생활(没有语言的生活)」, 「느리게 성장하기(慢慢成长)」, 「음란한마을(嫖村)」의 경우", 중국어문학논집, (66), pp.303~320 (2011), 중국어문학연구회
  14. 정정승, "의사소통과 비언어적 표현 양상", 영미어문학, (81), pp.225~249 (2006), 한국영미어문학회
  15. 최지현, "사적 언어는 국어교육의 공적 담론장에 들어오게 될 것인가", 새국어교육, (95), pp.29~69 (2013), 한국국어교육학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)