본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

할인크기와 조절초점에 따른 팽창가격할인 효과에 관한 비교분석

Comparative Analyses on the Effects of Tensile Price Discounts by Discount Size and Regulatory Focus

0

조회

0

다운로드

30

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경제학

초록

본 연구는 특정 상표에 대한 팽창가격할인 정보를 제공할 때 할인방식, 할인크기 및 소비자 조절초점이 소비자반응에 미치는 영향을 분석한다. 본 연구의 주요 목적은 할인방식에 따른 소비자 반응이 할인크기 및 조절초점에따라 달라지는가를 분석하는데 있다. 이를 위해 본 연구는 팽창가격할인과 관련된 선행연구를 고찰한 다음 네 가지연구가설을 제안하는데, 두 가지 가설은 할인방식과 할인크기의 주 효과에 관한 것이고, 나머지 가설은 할인방식과할인크기 및 할인방식과 조절초점의 상호작용효과에 관한 것이다. 본 연구는 연구가설을 검증하기 위해 실험방식을 통한 실증적인 자료를 수집했다. 실험설계에서 할인방식과 할인크기는 개체간 변수로 조작되었다. 할인방식은 최대할인, 범위할인, 최소할인 세 가지로 구분되고, 할인 크기는 높은 수준의 할인율(40-70%)과 낮은 수준의 할인율(10-40%)로 구분된다. 그 결과 모두 6개의 실험집단이 구성되었고 집단별로 서로 다는 할인방식과 할인크기가 제시되었다. 한편, 소비자들의 조절초점은 이에 대한 설문항목들에대한 응답결과를 바탕으로 사후적으로 구분되었다. 본 연구는 설정된 가설을 검증하기 위해 ANOVA 분석을 실시했다. 할인방식, 할인크기 및 조절초점은 주 효과로설정되었고, 할인방식과 할인크기 및 할인방식과 조절초점은 상호작용 효과로 설정되었다. 그 결과, 소비자는 할인율의 크기가 클수록 할인정보에 더 호의적인 것으로 나타났고, 할인방식이 소비자 반응에 미치는 영향은 할인율의크기에 따라 다르게 나타나는 것으로 나타났으며, 소비자들은 조절초점에 따라 할인방식에 대해 다르게 반응하고있음이 확인되었다. 마지막으로 본 연구는 연구의 결과를 요약하였고, 본 연구결과의 학술적 및 실무적 시사점을 제시했으며, 마지막으로 연구의 한계점과 후속연구방향을 제안했다.

Abstract

This study analyzed the effects of tensile price reduction type, discount size and consumers'regulatory focus on various types of consumer responses. Minimum discount announcement provides more specific information about the products to be discounted and thus minimum discount claims can be perceived more attractive. Recognizing these phenomena, we proposed differential effects of tensile price reductions by discount size and regulatory focus. We proposed four hypotheses based on prior studies about framing effects and regulatory focus. We propose 1) main effects of discount type, 2) main effects of discount size, 3) interaction effects between discount type and discount size and 4) interaction effects between discount type and regulatory focus. To test these research hypotheses, this study conducted experimental designs. Two hundred fifty undergraduate students were assigned to one of the six experimental groups. Discount type(minimum discount, range discount, and maximum discount) and discount size(10-40%discount, 40-70% discount) were manipulated as between-subject factors. In addition, ten items were developed to measure participants' regulatory focus. We classified participants into prevention focus or promotion focus based on their responses to regulatory goal. We attempted to provide more specific information about price reductions by naming the products to be discounted at the advertisements. We asked the participants to review the price reduction claims carefully and measured their evaluations. Dependent variables were perceived savings, attitude toward the deal and purchase intention of discount claims. Referring to prior research, we developed nine items to measure the dependent variables. Seven point differential semantic type scales were used to measure the nine items. Hypotheses relating to the dependent variables of perceived savings, attitude toward the deal and purchase intention were examined by ANOVAs followed by contrast between treatment groups. First, we confirmed the effects of tensile price reductions. Perceived savings, attitude toward the deal and purchase intention became higher when advertisements claimed a maximum or a range level of savings than when those claimed a minimum level of savings. Second, we found significant main effects of discount size. As expected, larger discount size led consumers to evaluate the discount claims more favorably. Third, we found significant interaction effects between discount claim types and discount size. When small size of discount range were announced we found significant differences in consumer evaluations between discount claim types(minimum discount < range discount < maximum discount). These results reconfirmed prior studies about tensile pice reductions. On the contrary, there were no significant differences between discount claim types when large size of discount range were announced. Forth, we found significant interaction effects between discount type and regulatory focus confirming regulatory fit effects. The results of this study contribute to the literature as the first attempt to examine the effects of tensile price reductions for specific brands. The results of our study also suggest that consumers' reactions to tensile price claims are affected by the discount size and consumers'regulatory focus. We summarized the study results and discussed the managerial implications for store managers. We also indicated the limitations of this study, and suggested the future research directions.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 김경미, "소비자의 조절초점과 팽창가격 할인광고의 효과", 마케팅연구, 23(4), pp.197~218 (2008), 한국마케팅학회
  2. 나준희, "소비자의 조절적 동기와 광고의 제시유형이 제품태도에 미치는 영향", 광고학연구, 16(2), pp.263~283 (2005), 한국광고학회
  3. 서찬주, "신제품의 소비자권장가격이 소비자 내부준거가격에 미치는 영향", 마케팅연구, 16(4), pp.1~24 (2001)
  4. 여준상, "자기조절초점과 제품유형이 비교 광고 노출에 따른 소비자 반응에 미치는 영향", 광고연구, 9(77), pp.95~118 (2007), 한국방송광고공사
  5. 조남기, "소비자의 팽창가격할인광고에 대한 반응에 있어서 준거가격 및 준거 프레임의 영향", 마케팅연구, 12(2), pp.123~144 (1997)
  6. 유창조, "제품계열에 대한 팽창가격할인 효과에 관한 실증분석", 마케팅연구, 25(4), pp.145~162 (2010), 한국마케팅학회
  7. 이미영, "브랜드 확장제품에 대한 태도에서 광고유형과 조절적 동기의 효과 연구", 광고연구, (74), pp.61~87 (2007), 한국방송광고공사
  8. 이진용, "가격정책의 공정성에 대한 소비자 판단에 관한 연구", 마케팅연구, 11(1), pp.77~103 (1996)
  9. 전승우, "정치적 이념성향이 정치광고의 광고태도형성에 미치는 영향 : 조절초점의 역할을 중심으로", 광고연구, 25(81), pp.252~283 (2008), 한국방송광고공사
  10. 하영원, "가격 정보의 시간적 분리 프레이밍이 소비자의 구매 의도에 미치는 영향", 소비자학연구, 13(2), pp.7~164 (2002), 한국소비자학회
  11. Aaker, Jennifer L., "I Seek Pleasures and We Avoid Pains: The Role of Self-Regulatory Goals in Information Processing and Persuasion", Journal of Consumer Research, 28, pp.33~49 (2001)
  12. Armstrong, Gary, "Marketing: An Introduction" (2009), Pearson Education International
  13. Bisvas, Abhijit, "Consumer Perceptions of Tensile Price Claims in Advertisement: An Assessment of Claim Types across Different Discount Levels", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(3), pp.217~229 (1993)
  14. Biswas, Abhijit, "An Experimental Assessment of Effects of Associated with Alternative Tensile Price Claims", Journal of Business Research, 29(1), pp.65~73 (1994)
  15. Crowe, Ellen, "Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations: Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making", Organizational Behavioral and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), pp.117~132 (1997)
  16. Fraccastoro, Katherine, "Effective Use of Advertisements Promoting Sale Prices", Journal of Consumer Marketing, 10(1), pp.61~70 (1993)
  17. Heath, Timothy B., "Mental Accounting and Changes in Price: The Frame Dependence of Reference Dependence", Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), pp.90~97 (1995)
  18. Higgins, E. Tory, "Beyond Pleasure and Pain", American Psychologist, 52(12), pp.1280~1300 (1997)
  19. Higgins, E. Tory, "Emotional Responses to Goal Attainment: Intensity of Regulatory Focus as Moderator", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), pp.515~525 (1997)
  20. Idson, Lorraine Chen, "Distinguishing Gains from Nonlosses and Losses from Nongains: A regulatory Focus Perspective on Hedonic Intensity", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, pp.252~274 (2000)
  21. Kahneman, Daniel, "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk", Econometrica, 47, pp.263~291 (1979)
  22. Lockwood, Penelope, "Motivation by Positive or Negative Role Models: Regulatory Focus Determines Who Will Best Inspired", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, pp.854~864 (2002)
  23. Mazumdar, Tridib, "Consumer Evaluations of Multiple Versus Single Price Change", Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), pp.441~450 (1993)
  24. Mobley, Mary F., "An Investigation of Individual Responses To Tensile Price Claims", Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), pp.273~279 (1988)
  25. Pham, Michel T, "Regulatory Focus, Regulatory Fit, and the Search and Consideration of Choice Alternatives", Journal of Consumer Research, 37(4), pp.626~640 (2010)
  26. Pham, Michel T., "Rethinking Regulatory Engagement Theory", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19(20), pp.115~123 (2009)
  27. Tversky, Amos, "Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference Dependent Model", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), pp.1039~1061 (1981)
  28. Wang, Jing, "The Role of Regulatory Focus in Preference Construction", Journal of Marketing Research, 28, pp.28~38 (2006)
  29. Zhu, Tui, "Exploring the Cognitive Mechanism that Underlies Regulatory Focus Effects", Journal of Consumer Research, 34(1), pp.89~96 (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)