목적별 번역 평가 모델에 관한 小考 － 국내외 번역품질평가(TQA) 분석을 중심으로 －
目的別翻訳評価モデルに関する考察 -国内外翻訳品質評価(TQA)分析を中心に-
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Translation quality is key in discussing translation, and the criteria that make a “good” target text are indispensible to the discussion of translation quality. Despite endless debate on the issue, the academic community has yet to agree on an explicit standard of what constitutes a “good” target text. Likewise, translation assessment has been done according to subjective criteria set by individuals without clear standards. The purpose of this study is to propose a systematic and consistent framework of translation assessment. The study categorizes translation tests according to function and purpose in light of Horguelin & Brunette’s(1998) definition of the function of Translation Quality Assessment(TQA), and then attempts to establish assessment models for each category. By providing a descriptive and prescriptive model of TQA, the study has the following expected contributions: first, establish clear standards to determine a “good” target text and evaluate potential translation competency; second, enhance the translation competency of learners with an assessment model that provides feedback; and third, better prepare student so they enter the market as competent professional translators. The proposed TQA model can be applied not only to the translation classroom but also situations where assessment takes place, drawing more systematic and consistent results.
Abstract
Translation quality is key in discussing translation, and the criteria that make a “good” target text are indispensible to the discussion of translation quality. Despite endless debate on the issue, the academic community has yet to agree on an explicit standard of what constitutes a “good” target text. Likewise, translation assessment has been done according to subjective criteria set by individuals without clear standards. The purpose of this study is to propose a systematic and consistent framework of translation assessment. The study categorizes translation tests according to function and purpose in light of Horguelin & Brunette’s(1998) definition of the function of Translation Quality Assessment(TQA), and then attempts to establish assessment models for each category. By providing a descriptive and prescriptive model of TQA, the study has the following expected contributions: first, establish clear standards to determine a “good” target text and evaluate potential translation competency; second, enhance the translation competency of learners with an assessment model that provides feedback; and third, better prepare student so they enter the market as competent professional translators. The proposed TQA model can be applied not only to the translation classroom but also situations where assessment takes place, drawing more systematic and consistent results.
참고문헌 (27)
- 김진아, "번역 품질평가에 관한 小考", 외국문학연구, 11(11), pp.4~124 (2002), 외국문학연구소
- 김한식, "한일 통역과 번역" (2003), 한국문화사
- 김효중, "번역의 역사와 이론독일의 전통을 중심으로", 번역학연구, 1(1), pp.40~ (2000)
- 성초림, "번역교육 현장에서의 번역물 품질 평가", 번역학연구, 2(2), pp.37~56 (2001)
- 이향, "번역품질평가의 현황과 과제", 번역학연구, 11(2), pp.107~125 (2010), 한국번역학회
- Baker, M, "In other words:A coursebook on translation" (1992), Routledge
- Baker, M, "Corpus-based translation studies: The challenges that lie ahead, In Terminology, LSP and translation: Studies in language engineering in honour of Juan C. Sager", pp.175~186 (1996), John Benjamins
- Campbell, S, "Translation into the second language" (1998), Addison Wesley Longman
- Catford, J. C, "A linguistic theory of translation: An essay on applied linguistics" (1965), Oxford University Press
- Doherty, M, "Parametrisierte perspektive", Zeitschrift für Sprachwisssenschaft, 12(S), pp.3~38 (1993)
- Gouadec, D, "Présentationdu Système d’évaluation positive destraductions«SEPT»" (1989), Bureau des traductions, Secrétariat d’État du
- Hatim, B., "The translator as communicator" (1997), Routledge
- Hickey, L, "The Pragmatics of Translation" (1998), Multilingual Matters
- Horguelin, P. A., "Pratique de la révision" (1998), Linguatec
- Hönig, H. G, "Positions, power and practice: Functionalist approaches and translation quality assessment, In Translation andquality", pp.6~34 (1998), Multilingual Matters
- House, J, "Translation quality assessment: Linguistic description vs social evaluation", Meta, 46(2), pp.243~257 (2001)
- Koller, W, "Einfünhrung in die Übersetzungswissenschaft" (1979), Quelle und Meyer
- Larose, R, "Méythodologie de l’évaluation des traductions", Meta, 43(2), pp.163~186 (1998)
- Nida, E. A, "Toward a science of translating" (1964), EJ. Brill
- PACTE GROUP, "Results of the validation of the Pacte translation competencemodel: Acceptability and decision making", Across Language and Cultures, 10(2), pp.207~230 (2009)
- Hueber, (1971), Hueber
- Reiss, K., "Grundlegung einer allgemeinen translationstheorie" (1984), Niemeyer
- Schähffner, C, "Hans Hönig: Konstruktives übersetzen", The Translator, 3(2), pp.238~242 (1997)
- Steiner, E, "A register-based translation evaluation: An advertisement as a casein point", Target, 10, pp.291~318 (1998)
- Toury, G, "Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond" (1995), John Benjamins
- Williams, M, "The application of argumentation theory to translation quality assessment", Meta, 46(2), pp.326~44 (2001)
- Wilss, W, "Probleme und perspektiven der ü)bersetzungskritik", IRAL, 12(1), pp.23~42 (1974)