본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

번역교육시 번역평가모델 활용의 필요성 고찰

Applying Translation Quality Assesment Models to Translator Training

0

조회

0

다운로드

18

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류통역번역학

초록

This paper proposes to apply various Translation Quality Assessment models to translation teaching in consideration of the importance of assesment. Translation assessment has been an area of heated debate and controversy due to its subjective, incoherent and unsystematic nature. Despite these shortcomings, translation assessment plays a pivotal role in the process of learning and teaching translation. Accordingly, familiarizing both students and teachers with various TQA models is in dire need. For students, TQA models could raise students’ awareness of the yardstick they are evaluated against in the near future, help students acquire systematic assessment skills, and teach them to effectively defend themselves in case of disagreement over how to define translation errors. TQA models are also conducive to teaching translation on the part of instructors. Various models could expose students to clients’ diverse perspectives at various levels, enabling teachers to avoid insisting upon their particular criteria. In addition, TQA models can be employed to effectively address students’ weaknesses with the specified categories. For these reasons, this paper proposes various TQA models be actively explored and applied in translation classroom for both students and teachers.

Abstract

This paper proposes to apply various Translation Quality Assessment models to translation teaching in consideration of the importance of assesment. Translation assessment has been an area of heated debate and controversy due to its subjective, incoherent and unsystematic nature. Despite these shortcomings, translation assessment plays a pivotal role in the process of learning and teaching translation. Accordingly, familiarizing both students and teachers with various TQA models is in dire need. For students, TQA models could raise students’ awareness of the yardstick they are evaluated against in the near future, help students acquire systematic assessment skills, and teach them to effectively defend themselves in case of disagreement over how to define translation errors. TQA models are also conducive to teaching translation on the part of instructors. Various models could expose students to clients’ diverse perspectives at various levels, enabling teachers to avoid insisting upon their particular criteria. In addition, TQA models can be employed to effectively address students’ weaknesses with the specified categories. For these reasons, this paper proposes various TQA models be actively explored and applied in translation classroom for both students and teachers.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 구하나, "번역평가와 “용인성(acceptabilité)”", 통번역학연구, 13(2), pp.1~28 (2010), 통번역연구소
  2. 신지선, "아동문학 번역시 스코포스 이론의 적용", 번역학연구, 6(2), pp.125~140 (2005), 한국번역학회
  3. 신지선, "공공기관 번역현황 설문조사 결과 및 분석", 번역학연구, 8(2), pp.75~103 (2007), 한국번역학회
  4. 국가 번역시스템 구축을 위한 기초연구, "신지선", 한국문학번역원, ~ (2007)
  5. 정혜용, "번역평가에서 번역비평으로", 한국번역비평학회 동계 심포지움 발표문 (2008), 고려대 레토릭연구소
  6. 오길영, "객관적인 평가의 틀': 정영목 선생의 글을 읽고", 안과밖:영미문학연구, (17), pp.67~73 (2004), 영미문학연구회
  7. 이근희, "말뭉치를 활용한 ‘by’의 번역투 연구", 동화와 번역, (10), pp.7~46 (2005), 동화와번역연구소
  8. 이상원, "한국 출판 번역 독자들의 번역평가 규범 연구" (2006), 한국학술정보
  9. 이희재, "번역의 탄생" (2009), 교양인
  10. 전현주, "번역비평에 대한 비평적 분석", 박사, pp.2006
  11. 전현주, "번역비평 텍스트의 패러다임", 번역학연구, 9(1), pp.215~258 (2008), 한국번역학회
  12. 정영목, "영미연의 번역평가사업에 대한 단상", 안과밖:영미문학연구, (16), pp.225~231 (2004), 영미문학연구회
  13. 조성원, "번역평가 기준으로서의 ‘충실성’과 ‘가독성’에 대하여", 안과밖:영미문학연구, (23), pp.96~119 (2007), 영미문학연구회
  14. 문학번역 평가 시스템 연구, "최미경", 한국문학번역원, ~ (2007)
  15. Baker, Mona, "In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation" (1992), Routledge
  16. Brunette, Louise, "Towards a Terminology for Translation Quality Assessment: A Comparison of TQA Practices. in: Evaluation and Translation", pp.169~182 (2000), St. Jerome
  17. House, Juliane, "A Model for Translation Quality Assessment" (1977), Gunter Narr Verlag
  18. House, Juliane, "Translation Quality Assessment: Linguistic Description versus Social Evaluation", Meta, 46(2), pp.243~257 (2001)
  19. Hönig, Hans, "Positions, Power and Practice: Functionalist Approaches and Translation Quality Assessment. in: Translation and Quality", pp.6~34 (1998), Multilingual Matters
  20. Kussmaul, Paul, "Training the Translator" (1995), John Benjamins
  21. Lauscher, Susanne, "Translation Quality Assessment: Where Can Theory and Practice Meet?. in: Evaluation and Translation", pp.149~168 (2000), St. Jerome
  22. Munday, Jeremy, "Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications" (2001), Routledge
  23. Newmark, Peter, "About Translation" (1991), Multilingual Matters
  24. Nida, Eugene, "Principles of Correspondence. in: The Translation Studies Reader", pp.126~140 (2000), Routledge
  25. Nord, Catharina, "Translating as a Purposeful Activity: Functionalist Approach Explained" (1997), St. Jerome
  26. Reiss, Katharina, "Translation Criticism-The Potentials & Limitations: Categories and Criteria for Translation Quality Assessment" (2000), St. Jerome
  27. Schäffner, Christina, "From 'Good' to 'Functionally Appropriate': Assessing Translation Quality. in: Translation and Quality", pp.1~5 (1998), Multilingual Matters
  28. Toury, Gideon, "Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond" (1995), John Benjamins
  29. Vermeer, Hans, "Skopos and Commission in Translational Action. in: The Translation Studies Reader", pp.221~232 (2000), Routledge
  30. Williams, Malcolm, "Translation Quality Assessment: An Argumentation-centered Approach" (2004), University of Ottawa Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)