문학번역 평가 어떻게 할 것인가?
From error analysis to criticism on literary translation
1
조회
0
다운로드
45
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Nowadays into-Korean-translations of foreign literary works are frequently assessed in articles, books and newspapers. It is a positive phenomenon because active feedback from readers contributes to improving the quality of translation. But it is disappointing that the main focus of assessment has been to find translation errors and failures. Discussions on the translation of foreign literary works need to be changed from error analysis to criticism. This paper deals with several points, which should contribute to the a forementioned paradigm shift: translation of foreign literary work is a literary work itself, not a copy of foreign literary work; translation error analysis is too microscopic; beliefs about what is 'good' translation can differ between translators and assessors; assessors may not have the necessary capabilities to assess translations; revision work done by publishing companies has to be considered in translation assessment.
Abstract
Nowadays into-Korean-translations of foreign literary works are frequently assessed in articles, books and newspapers. It is a positive phenomenon because active feedback from readers contributes to improving the quality of translation. But it is disappointing that the main focus of assessment has been to find translation errors and failures. Discussions on the translation of foreign literary works need to be changed from error analysis to criticism. This paper deals with several points, which should contribute to the a forementioned paradigm shift: translation of foreign literary work is a literary work itself, not a copy of foreign literary work; translation error analysis is too microscopic; beliefs about what is 'good' translation can differ between translators and assessors; assessors may not have the necessary capabilities to assess translations; revision work done by publishing companies has to be considered in translation assessment.
참고문헌 (19)
- Hönig, H. G., "Positions, power and practice: functionalist approaches and translation quality assessment, In Translation and quality", pp.6~34 (1998), Multilingual matters
- Newmark, P., "Approaches to translation" (1980), Pergamon
- Nida, E. A., "The theory and practice of translation" (1969), E.J. Brill
- 강대진, "잔혹한 책읽기" (2004), 작은이야기
- 교수신문, "최고의 고전 번역을 찾아서" (2006), 생각의 나무
- 김성일, "원문의 미묘한 뉘앙스 전달 못해. 고전번역비평-최고의 번역본을 찾아서 59 톨스토이 ‘안나 카레니나’", 교수신문, ~ (2007)
- 김효중, "번역 이론의 관점에서 본 영랑 김윤식의 예이츠시 번역", 어문학, 78, pp.259~284 (2002), 한국어문학회
- 박여성, "번역비평을 위한 번역 파라디그마의 효용성: 연구 시안(4)-귄터 그라스의 ‘양철북’과 한국어 번역본을 중심으로", 2002년 한국독일어문학회발표논문집 독일어문학: 번역과 수용, pp.53~72 (2002)
- 박혜주, "문학번역 평가시스템 연구" (2007), 한국문학번역원
- 손지봉, "문학번역 평가기준에 관하여", 통역과 번역, 8(1), pp.67~106 (2006), 한국통역번역학회
- 신수송, "문화수용과 문화전이로서의 번역 - 괴테, 카프카, 토마스 만 작품의 한국어 번역 연구", 독일언어문학, 18(18), pp.259~299 (2002), 한국독일언어문학회
- 심재기, "한국문학의 외국어번역에 대한 국내 번역비평의 동향", 독일언어문학, 34(34), pp.237~13 (2006), 한국독일언어문학회
- 영미문학연구회 번역평가 사업단, "영미명작, 좋은 번역을 찾아서" (2005), 창비
- 영미문학연구회 번역평가 사업단, "영미명작, 좋은 번역을 찾아서 2" (2007), 창비
- 이상원, "한국출판번역 독자들의 번역평가규범 연구" (2006), 한국학술정보
- 이상원, "출판번역의 교정교열", 통역과 번역, 9(1), pp.73~85 (2007), 한국통역번역학회
- 이재호, "문화의 오역" (2005), 동인
- 이정수, "문학번역의 양식과 기교에 관한 연구 -한국단편소설의 영역을 중심으로-", 새한영어영문학, 47(2), pp.181~212 (2005), 새한영어영문학회
- 전현주, "번역 텍스트의 용인성:번역 비평가의 관점을 중심으로", 번역학연구, 7(2), pp.179~205 (2006), 한국번역학회